Moskiewski konceptualizm - między awangardą a postmodernizmem

• Authors: Pietraś Elżbieta
• Languages of publication: PL EN RU

Abstracts

EN

The Moscov Conceptualism was one of the famous phenomena of non-official art. It showed emptiness of soviet paintings, literature, art. The Moscow underground was connected by the same feeling and need to change the soviet language poisoned by demagogy of politicians, by the falsity of official slogans and literature. It entered two influential styles in non-formal culture of the 1970s and 1980s. First of them was concentrated on a visual art and used term "soc-art" connected with series of paintings by Vitaly Komar and Alexander Malamid. It compared material forms of soviet ideology (posters, slogans, graphic art) with the profusion of Western commercial advertising products and pop art. The second circle of artists was concentrated near Ilya Kabakov and included not only painters but also great writers like Dmitry Prigov, Lev Rubinstein and Vladimir Sorokin, who used to deconstruct typical socrealistic literature by showing her absurd. This trend was called Moscow Conceptualism and was in many points connected with traditions of avant-garde art, especially futurism and OBERIU.

Keywords

EN

conceptualism; underground; soc art; avant-garde; postmodernism

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski w Olsztynie
• Journal: Acta Neophilologica
• Year: 2007
• Issue: IX
• Pages: 131-142

Dates

published

2007

Contributors

author

Pietraś Elżbieta

• Uniwersytet Gdański

References

• Кобринский A., Авангард после авангарда, Дружба народов 2004, № 4, <magazines.russ.ru//druzhba/2004/4/kobr11.html>.
• Руднев В. П., Словарь культуры XX века, Москва 1997, s. 12, hasło: Авангард, <http://rudnev-vadim.viv.ru/cont/slowar/3.html>.
• Курицын B., О проблеме „авангардной парадигмыi ”, w: Русский литературный постмодернизм, <http://www.guelman.ru/slava/postmod/2.html>.
• Тырышкина E. В., Декаданс — авангард — постмодернизм: трансформация эстетического дискурса, <http://avantgarde.narod.ru/beitraege/ov/et_transformation.htm>.
• Drawicz A., Tragiczna zabawa OBERIU, czyli inna Rosja poetycka, Kraków 1991.
• Ерофеев B., Д. Пригов, В. Сорокин, ЁПС: Сборник рассказов и стихов, Москва 2002.
• Handke R., Odbiorca dzieła jako partner dialogu, Teksty 1980, 1, s. 37-68.
• Берг M., Литературократия. Проблема присвоения и перераспределения власти в литературе, Москва 2000.
• Barański Z., J. Litwinow, Rosyjskie manifesty literackie, część II, Poznań 1976.
• Шапир M., Эстетический опыт XX века: Авангард и постмодернизм, Philologica 1995, t. 2, nr 3/4, s. 137, <http://www.rvb.ru/philologica/02/02postmodernism.htm>.
• Курицын B., Русский литературный постмодернизм, Москва 2000.
• Скоропанова И. С., Русская постмодернистская литература, Москва 2001.
• Бирюкова C.E., Любовь к трем авангардам, Арион 2000, 3 <http://magazines.russ.ru/arion//2000/3/birukov-pr.html>.

Identifiers

ISSN

1509-1619