Statystyczna analiza ryzykownych sytuacji decyzyjnych

• Authors: Ostasiewicz Stanisława

Title variants

EN

Statistical analysis of risky situations

• Languages of publication: PL EN

Abstracts

EN

The paper contains a new classification of risk situations, which enables the unified treatment of all kinds of problems concerning risk and uncertainty. One of the implications which one can draw from this classification is that there is no sense to formu-late general risk theories. In majority of situation the so called risk management is based on common sense supported by past experiences and some analytical tools. However, there are situations of a particular practical significance which for nearly one hundreds of years have been intensively investigated. As a result of these endeavors a number of models have been developed, particularly models known as expected utility models, and non-expected utility models. One of the main goals of this paper is to highlight the mean-ing of the basic notations used in these models: utility and subjective expected utility.

Keywords

EN

risks classification; utility maximization; risk theories; subjective utility theo-ries

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu
• Journal: Śląski Przegląd Statystyczny
• Year: 2015
• Issue: 13 (19)
• Pages: 111-130

Contributors

author

Ostasiewicz Stanisława

References

• Domański Cz. (red.), Nieklasyczne metody oceny efektywności i ryzyka, PWE, Warszawa 2011.
• Fishburn P., Mathematics of decision theory, Mouton, Paris 1972.
• Fishburn P., Nonlinear preference and utility theory, Wheatsheaf Books, 1988.
• Fishburn P., Tieorija poleznosti dla prinjatija reszenij, Nauka, Moskwa 1978.
• French S., Decision theory: an introduction to the mathematics of rationality, Ellis Hor-wood, New York 1993.
• Gollier Ch., The Economics of Risk and Time, MIT Press, 2004.
• Jajuga K., (red.), Zarządzanie ryzykiem, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa 2009.
• Karni E., Risk aversion and saving behavior: summary and extension, „International Economic Review” 1982, Vol. 23, No. 1, s. 35–42.
• Kreps D.M., Notes on the theory of choice, Westview Press, London 1988.
• Lind N.C. (red.), Technological risk, University of Waterloo Press, 1982.
• Mayerson R.B., An axiomatic derivation of subjective probability, utility, and evaluation functions, „Theory and Decision” 1979, Vol. 11, s. 339–352.
• Munier B. (ed.), Risk, decision and rationality, Reidel, 1988.
• Ostasiewicz W., Ryzyko i ubezpieczenia, [w:] Ostasiewicz W. (red.), Składki i ryzyko ubezpieczeniowe. Modelowanie stochastyczne, Wydawnictwo Akademii Ekonomicz-nej we Wrocławiu, Wrocław 2004, s. 11–14.
• Ostasiewicz W., Użyteczność, [w:] Ostasiewicz W. (red.), Metody ilościowe w ekonomii, Wydawnictwo Akademii Ekonomicznej we Wrocławiu, Wrocław 1999, s. 259–299.
• Pratt J.W., Risk Aversion in the Small and in the Large, „Econometrica” 1964, Vol. 32, s. 122–136.
• Quiggin J., Generalized expected utility theory. The rank-dependent model, Kluwer, Boston 1993.
• Rybicki W., Dualizm zadań kwantyfikacji ryzyka i postaw wobec niego, Prace Naukowe Akademii Ekonomicznej we Wrocławiu nr 878. Ekonometria 6, Wrocław 2000, s. 160–174.
• Rybicki W., Mathematics of Utility and Risk. Three Papers on Stochastic Economy, Fi-nance and Insurance, „Argumenta Oeconomica” 1997, No. 1(4), s. 245–270.
• Schmidt U., Axiomatic utility theory under risk. Non-Archimedean representations and application to insurance economics, Springer, 1998.
• Skorupka D., Methods of Construction Projections Risk Assesment, MOCRA, LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing GmbH&Co, KG and licensors, Saarbruckers 2012.
• Starmer Ch., Developments in non-expected utility theory: the hunt for a descriptive theory of choice under risk, „Journal of Economic Literature” 2000, Vol. 38, s. 332–382.
• Winkler-Drews T., Zarządzanie ryzykiem zmiany ceny, PWE, Warszawa 2009.
• Yaari M.E., Dual Theory of Choice under Risk, „Econometrica” January 1987, Vol. 55, Issue 1, s. 95–115.