Tradycyjny instytucjonalizm i jego znaczenie dla nauk politycznych

• Authors: Minkner Kamil
• Languages of publication: PL

Abstracts

EN

The paper presents academic achievements of traditional institutionalism, the first scientific approach in political science, which was developed since the second part of the 19th century in USA, Great Britain, Germany and France. The author argues that this orientation had a creative influence on the progress of the discipline, however this impact is not appreciated by contemporary studies in the field of political science and political theory where limited understanding of the old institutionalism is promoted. The revision of this state of affairs has shown that, apart from the analysis of formal structures and institutions of state power, the traditionalists also have studied political parties (A. L. Lowell), interest groups (T. Eschenburg), public opinion (J. Bryce) and informal socio-political phenomena such as influence (C. J. Friedrich). Additionally, the first institutionalists formed the foundations for methodological self-consciousness of young political science and forged concepts that have been verified by subsequent generations of political scientists. They also conducted the first comparative studies of political systems (H. Finer, C. J. Friedrich). Many of these scholars went beyond pure theory by linking their reflections with planning and reforming political institutions. In this context, the author discusses research on relations between politics and administration (F. J. Goodnow), considerations on demonopolization of power (H. J. Laski) and refers to the debate on efficiency of different branches of government (e.g. in Poland after passing the March Constitution of 1921).

Keywords

PL

tradycyjny (stary) instytucjonalizm; historia politologii (nauk politycznych); orientacja formalno-prawna; teorie politologiczne

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu. Wydawnictwo UMK
• Journal: Historia i Polityka
• Year: 2015
• Issue: 13(20)
• Pages: 9-30

Contributors

author

Minkner Kamil

• Uniwersytet Opolski

References

• A New Handbook of Political Science (red.) R. E. Goodin, H. Klingemann, Oxford 1998.
• A. L. Lowell, The Influence of Party upon Legislation in England and America, Washington 1902.
• A. W. Jabłoński, Teorie państwa i grup interesów w teoriach polityki [w:] Grupy interesu. Teorie i działanie, red. Z. Machelski, L. Rubisz, Toruń 2003, s. 34–45.
• B. C. Pearson, Faith and Democracy: Political Transformations at the German Protestant Kirchentag, 1949–1969, Chapel Hill 2007, s. 207–209.
• B. G. Peters, Institutional Theory in Political Science. The „New Institutionalism”, Ashford 2005, s. 3–9, 11.
• C. J. Friedrich, Constitutional Government and Politics. Nature and Development, New York 1937, s. 3–18, 101–112, 144–159, 299–300, 471–472.
• C. Schmitt, O pojęciu polityczności [w:] C. Schmitt, Teologia polityczna i inne pisma, Kraków 2000, s. 211–213.
• Contemporary Political Science. A Survey of Methods, Research and Teaching, UNESCO, Paris 1950, s. 406, 621, 650.
• D. Thomson, British Literature on Comparative Political Institutions [w:] Contemporary Political Science. A Survey of Methods, Research and Teaching, UNESCO, Paris 1950, s. 491.
• E. Barker, Reflections on Government, Oxford 1942.
• F. Goodnow, Politics and Administration. A Study in Government, New York–London 1900, s. V, 18–46..
• F. J. Turner, O znaczeniu pogranicza w amerykańskiej historii, tłum. B. Czepil, Pogranicze. Polish Borderlands Studies 2014, t. 2, nr 2, s. 139–162.
• G. Bancroft, History Of The Formation Of The Constitution Of The United States, New York 1882.
• G. H. Utter, Ch. Lockhart, American Political Scientists: A Dictionary, Westport 2002, s. 236–237.
• G. S. Langrod, Political Science in Poland [w:] Contemporary Political Science. A Survey of Methods, Research and Teaching, UNESCO, Paris 1950, s. 188–189.
• H. Finer, The Theory and Practice Modern Government, London 1961, s. 311.
• H. Laski, The Foundations of Sovereignty and Other Essays [w:] The Pluralist Theory of the State, red. P. Q. Hirst, London–New York 2005, s. 185, 190–191.
• J. Adcock, Liberalism and the Emergence of American Political Science: A Transatlantic Tale, Oxford 2014, s. 204– 213.
• J. Bryce, Modern Democracies, Vol. 1, New York 1921, s. 13–19, 23, 519–526.
• J. Bryce, The American Commonwealth, Vol. 1, London–New York 1893, s. 277–297.
• J. Farr, The Historical Science(s) of Politics: The Principles, Association, and Fate of an American Discipline [w:] Modern Political Science: Anglo-American Exchanges since 1880, R. Adcock, M. Bevir, S. C. Stimson (red.), Princeton 2007, s. 66.
• J. Kostrubiec, Georg Jellinek – klasyk niemieckiej nauki o państwie (w 95. rocznicę śmierci), Studia Iuridica Lublinensia 2006, t. VII, s. 65.
• J. Lane, S. Ersson, The New Institutional Politics: Outcomes and Consequences, Routledge 2000, s. 31–35.
• J. Panejko, Geneza i podstawy samorządu europejskiego, Wilno 1934.
• J. S. Langrod, Regjonalizm administracyjny w teorji i w życiu, Warszawa 1932.
• K. Grzybowski, Nauka o państwie, Kraków 1949.
• K. von Beyme, Współczesne teorie polityczne, Warszawa 2005, s. 87–88.
• K. W. Kumaniecki, J. S. Langrod, S. Wachholz, Zarys ustroju, postępowania i prawa administracyjnego w Polsce, Kraków–Warszawa 1939.
• M. Bevir, R. A. W. Rhodes, The State as Cultural Practice, Oxford 2010, s. 6–8.
• M. Chałubiński, Socjologia polityki Maxa Webera, Studia Politologiczne 2004, vol. 8, s. 69–95.
• M. Duverger, Political Parties, London 1954, s. 88.
• P. W. Hutchins, recenzja książki Reflections on Government E. Barkera, Les Cahiers de Droit 1969, vol. 10, nr 1, s. 242.
• R. A. W. Rhodes, Old Institutionalisms [w:] Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions, R. A. W. Rhodes, S. Binder, B. A. Rockman (red.), Oxford 2006, s. 94-96.
• R. Macridis, Major Characteristics of the Traditional Approach [w:] Approaches to the Study of Politics, red. B. Susser, London 1992, s. 16–22.
• R. Tahmasebi, S. M. M. Musavi, Politics-Administration Dichotomy: A Century Debate, Administration and Public Management 2011, nr 17, s. 132–133.
• R.M. Małajny, Doktryna podziału władzy „Ojców Konstytucji” USA, Katowice 1985.
• S. Ehrlich, Oblicza pluralizmów, Warszawa 1980, s. 140–149.
• T. D. Woolsey, Political Science: Or, The State Theoretically and Practically Considered, New York 1877.
• V. Lowndes, Instytucjonalizm [w:] Teorie i metody w naukach politycznych, D. Marsh, G. Stoker (red.), Kraków 2006, s. 89–93, 96–100.
• W. I. Al-Habil, The Administrative Ethics Between Professionalism and Individual Conscience, Business and Management Review 2011, Vol. 1(10), s. 44.
• W. Komarnicki, Polskie prawo polityczne. Geneza i system, Warszawa 1922.
• W. Robson, Political Science in Great Britain [w:] Contemporary Political Science. A Survey of Methods, Research and Teaching, UNESCO, Paris 1950, s. 296–297.
• W. T. Kulesza, Nowela sierpniowa z 1926 r., Przegląd Sejmowy 2006, nr 4, s. 17–18.

Identifiers

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/HiP.2015.001