The sense of games and undeserved suffering Some comments on Book V of Vergil's Aeneid

• Authors: Śnieżewski Stanisław
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Many scholars believe that literary and artistic level of Book V of Vergil`s Aeneid is much lower than in the neighbouring books four and six. Nonetheless a detailed analysis of the contents and composition allows, in my opinion, to treat Book V as interesting and valuable. Vergil concentrated primarily on the sense of suffering which often befalls innocent people. The most vivid is the example of Palinurus whose undeserved and sacrificial death permits Aeneas to continue with his mission. The death of Palinurus and Dido is, I think, a symbolic farewell of Aeneas with the Trojan past and the wandering on the sea. The participants in the games are all secondary characters. By introducing them Vergil, I believe, wished to stress the importance of every man of Aeneas` crew in the fulfilling of the task set by destiny. The importance of fatum and fortuna increases exponentially in the instances where human strength and abilities fail.

Keywords

EN

Virgil; Aeneid; Aeneas; Palinurus; undeserved suffering; games on Sicily; Anchises; Acestes; fortune; fatum; ecphrasis

• Publisher: Księgarnia Akademicka
• Journal: Classica Cracoviensia
• Year: 2012
• Issue: 15: Leadership in Antiquity: Langauge - Institutions - Representations
• Pages: 205-221

Contributors

author

Śnieżewski Stanisław

• Jagiellonian University

References

• Bailey C., 1935, Religion in Virgil, Oxford.
• Barchiesi A., 1994, ‘Rappresentazioni del dolore e interpretazione nell`Eneide’, Antike und Abendland 40, p. 109-124.
• Barchiesi A., 1997, ‘Virgilian Narrative: Ecphrasis’, [in:] Ch. Martindale (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Virgil, Cambridge, p. 271-281.
• Feldherr A., 1995, ‘Ships of State: Aeneid 5 and Augustan Circus Spectacle’, Classical Antiquity 14, p. 245-265.
• Galinsky G.K., 1968, ‘Aeneid V and the Aeneid’, The American Journal of Philology 89, p. 157-185.
• Kehoe P.E., 1989, ‘Was Book 5 Once in a Different Place in the Aeneid’, The American Journal of Philology 110, p. 246-263.
• Miller P.A., 1995, ‘The Minotaur Within: Fire, the Labyrinth, and Strategies of Containment in Aeneid 5 and 6’, Classical Philology 90, p. 225-240.
• Perret J., 1942, Les origines de la légende troyenne de Rome (281-31), Paris.
• Putnam M.C.J., 1962, ‘Unity and Design in Aeneid V’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 66, p. 205-239.
• Putnam M.C.J., 1965, The Poetry of the Aeneid, Cambridge.
• Ravenna G., 1974, ‘L`ekphrasis poetica di opera d`arte in latino. Temi e problemi’, Quaderni dell`Istituto di Filologia Latina dell`Università di Padova 3, p. 1-51.
• Sullivan F.A., 1969, ‘Virgil and the Mystery of Suffering’, The American Journal of Philology 90, p. 161-177.
• Williams R.D., 1960, P. Vergilii Maronis Aeneidos liber quintus, edited with a commentary, Oxford.
• Willis W.H., 1941, ‘Athletic Contests in the Epic’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 72, p. 392-417.

Identifiers

DOI

10.12797/CC.15.2012.15.10