Passing-on of Overcharges and the Implementation of the Damages Directive in CEE Countries

• Authors: Moisejevas Raimundas
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The article focuses on the concept of passing-on of overcharges and the peculiarities of its regulation by the Damages Directive. The Damages Directive obliges Member States to ensure that the defendant in an action for damages may invoke the passing-on defence. Moreover, the Directive establishes the new framework and the main principles that govern the application of the passing-on defence. The national case law on passing-on is very insignificant in Central and Eastern European countries and many questions are expected to be raised in the courts of the CEE Member States. While discussing the concept of passing-on in the Damages Directive, a lot of emphasis should be paid to the issue of causation. Causation will definitely be the subject of most of the questions in cases when an indirect purchaser will bring a claim for damages. Causation may be tricky when an indirect purchaser claims it suffered an ‘overcharge harm’ because of passing-on. In most cases, the issue of causation will be decided mainly by national courts based on national procedural rules. Depending on the situation, passing-on may be used as a basis for the claim (as a ‘sword’) or as a defence (as a ‘shield’). It could be used as a basis for the claim by an indirect purchaser, in case s/he has suffered any harm because of the illegal actions of a cartelist or a dominant company. At the same time, it could be used as a defence by the infringer against a claim for damages. The article also analyses the specifics of the implementation of the Directive into the national laws of CEE Member States.

Keywords

EN

antitrust damage; consumers; passing-on of overcharges; Lithuania; private enforcement of competition law; antitrust damage claims; Directive on antitrust damages actions; calculation of damages

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydział Nauk Ekonomicznych
• Journal: Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies
• Year: 2017
• Volume: 10(15)
• Pages: 133-146

Dates

published

2017-06-30

Contributors

author

Moisejevas Raimundas

• Dr. Raimundas Moisejevas – Attorney at law, Arbitrator, ICSID Conciliator and Professor in Business Law Department, Faculty of Law, Mykolas Romeris University, Lithuania

References

• Bovis, C.H. and Clarke, C.M. (2015). Private Enforcement of EU Competition Law. Liverpool Law Review, 36, 49–71.
• Brkan, M. and Bratina, T. (2013). Private Enforcement of Competition Law in Slovenia: A New Field to Be Developed by Slovenian Courts. Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies, 6(8), 75–106.
• Butorac Malnar, V. (2017). Croatia. In: A. Piszcz (ed.), Implementation of the EU Damages Directive in Central and Eastern European Countries (55–84). Warsaw: University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management Press.
• Durand, B., Williams, I., Hitchings, P., Quintana, Hain-Cole, J. and Luis, L. (2016). Study on the Passing-On of Overcharges. Final report. doi: 10.2763/590101. Retrieved from: https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/a18be06b-fa5d-11e6-8a35-01aa75ed71a1/language-en/format-PDF (22.08.2017).
• Jurkowska-Gomułka, A. (2013). Private Enforcement of Competition Law in Polish Courts: The Story of an (Almost) Lost Hope for Development. Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies, 6(8), 107–128.
• Lianos, I., Davis, P. and Nebbia, P. (2015). Damages Claims for the Infringement of EU Competition Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Moisejevas, R. (2015). Development of Private Enforcement of Competition Law in Lithuania. Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies, 8(11), 35–52.
• Parlak, S. (2010). Passing-on defence and indirect purchaser standing: should the passing-on defence be rejected now the indirect purchaser has standing after Manfredi and the White paper of the European Commission? World Competition, 33(1), 31–53.
• Pärn-Lee, E. (2017). Estonia. In: A. Piszcz (ed.), Implementation of the EU Damages Directive in Central and Eastern European Countries (109–126). Warsaw: University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management Press.
• Petr, M. (2017). Czech Republic. In: A. Piszcz (ed.), Implementation of the EU Damages Directive in Central and Eastern European Countries (85–108). Warsaw: University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management Press.
• Petrucci, C. (2008). The issues of the passing-on defence and indirect purchaser standing in European competition law. European Competiton Law Review, 29(1), 33–42.
• Peyer, S. (2016). Compensation and the Damages Directive. European Competition Journal, 12(1), 87–112.
• Piszcz, A. (2012). Still-unpopular Sanctions: Developments in Private Antitrust Enforcement in Poland After the 2008 White Paper. Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies, 5(7), 55–77.
• Piszcz, A. (ed.). (2017). Implementation of the EU Damages Directive in Central and Eastern European Countries. Warsaw: University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management Press.
• Sein, K. (2013). Private Enforcement of Competition Law – the Case of Estonia. Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies, 6(8), 129–140, doi:10.2139/ssrn.2736227.
• Smuda, F. (2014). Cartel overcharges and the deterrent effect of EU competition law. Journal of Competition Law and Economics, 10(1), 63–86.
• Strand, M. (2014). Indirect purchasers, passing-on and the new directive on competition law damages. European Competition Journal, 10(2), 361–386.

Identifiers

ISSN

1689-9024

DOI

10.7172/1689-9024.YARS.2017.10.15.7