Beyond Vote Rigging: Common Patterns in Electoral Malpractices in De-Democratizing Regimes

• Authors: Szymański Adam , Ufel Wojciech
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

For the past decade in many countries in Europe and its close neighborhood we have observed different types of processes which can be named as “de-democratization”. The aim of the article is to analyze the state of elections as the crucial democratic institution which fairness and competitiveness have a substantial impact on the political regime. While Turkey as a “role model” for our analysis remains a main focus of the article, three European countries were selected for a comparison based on their relative similarity to Turkey – Hungary, Macedonia (FYROM) and Serbia. The following questions are posed: Are elections in these countries free, fair and competitive? Can some types of electoral malpractice and irregularities be identified? How does the state of elections in terms of their fairness and competitiveness influence the political regime? The main hypothesis is that in the analyzed countries elections competitiveness limited by incumbents can become a factor deciding about the change within the political regime in the long run (loss of democratic quality) and also change the regime (to a less democratic one).

Keywords

EN

de-democratization; political regime; electoral integrity; electoral malpractice; Turkey; Hungary; Serbia; Macedonia (FYROM)

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
• Journal: Polish Political Science Yearbook
• Year: 2018
• Volume: 4 (47)
• Pages: 593-617

Contributors

author

Szymański Adam

• University of Warsaw

author

Ufel Wojciech

• University of Wrocław

References

• $6 billion economic handout package to go into effect a month before Turkish elections (2018, 1 May). Hurriyet Daily News, http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/ahead-of-election-turkey-offers-6-billion-incentive-package-131125
• Agh, A. (2014). Decline of Democracy in East-Central Europe: The Last Decade as the Lost Decade in Democratization. Journal of Comparative Politics, 7(2), 4 – 33.
• Agh A. (2015). De-Europeanization and De-democratization Trends in ECE: From the Potemkin Democracy to the Elected Autocracy in Hungary. Journal of Comparative Politics, 8(2), 4 – 26.
• Agh A. (2016). The Rocky Road of Europeanization in the New Member States: From the Democracy Capture to the Second Try of Democratization. Polish Sociological Review, 193(1), 71 – 86.
• Akarca A.T. (2015). Putting Turkey’s June and November 2015 Election Outcomes in Perspective. Insight Turkey, 17(4), 81 – 104.
• Anastasakis, O. (2017, 19 April). The five “infections” of the social democratic “family” in the Western Balkans. https://www.opendemocracy.net/can-europe-make-it/othon-anastasakis/five-infections-of-social-democratic-family-in-western-balkans
• Aslan-Akman C. (2012). The 2011 Parliamentary Elections in Turkey and Challenges Ahead for Democratic Reform Under a Dominant Party System. Mediterranean Politics, 17(1), 77 – 95.
• Aydın-Düzgit S., Kaliber A. (2016). Encounters with Europe in an Era of Domestic and International Turmoil: Is Turkey a De-Europeanising Candidate Country?. South European Society and Politics, 21(1) 1 – 14.
• Aygül C. (2016). Electoral manipulation in March 30, 2014 Turkish local elections. Turkish Studies, 17(1), 181 – 201.
• Bardakçı M. (2016). 2015 parliamentary elections in Turkey: demise and revival of AKP’s single-party rule. Turkish Studies, 17(1), 4 – 18.
• Belgrade Center for Security Policy. (2016). Monitoring and Evaluation of the Rule of Law in the Western Balkans. Belgrade.
• Birch S. (2011). Electoral malpractice, New York: Oxford University Press.
• Bíró-Nagy, A. (2017). Illiberal Democracy in Hungary: The Social Background and Practical Steps of Building an Illiberal State. In P. Morilas (Ed.), Illiberal Democracies in the EU: the Visegrad Group and the Risk of Disintegration. Barcelona: CIDOB Editions, 31 – 44.
• Bozóki, A. (2014). Façade Pluralism in Semi-democracies: The Case of Hungary. Presented at the IPSA World Congress, Montreal, Canada. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/278034607_Facade_Plural­ism_in_Semi-democracies_The_Case_of_Hungary
• Clark G. L. (2004). Stealing our votes: How politicians conspire to control elections and how to stop them, Dorance Publishing.
• CRTA – Citizens on Watch. (2016). Election Observation Mission – Final Report. Early Parliamentary Elections 2016.
• CRTA – Citizens on Watch. (2017). Election Observation Mission – Final Report. Presidential Elections 2017. Belgrade.
• Çarkoğlu A., Yıldırım K. (2015). Election Storm in Turkey: What do the Results of June and November 2015 Elections Tell Us. Insight Turkey, 17(4), 57 – 79.
• Çelikyay H. (2014). Yeni büyükşehir yasası perspektifinde 2014 yerel seçimleri. SETA Perspektif, 48. Doğan S. (2017). Mahalledeki AKP. Parti İşleyişi, Taban Mobilizasyonu ve SiyasalYabancılaşma, Istanbul: İletişim.
• Eligür B. (2009). Turkey’s March 2009 Local Elections. Turkish Studies, 10(3), 469 – 496.
• Erdoğan approves new election law amid opposition concern over fraud (2018, 16 March). Hurriyet Daily News, http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/president-erdogan-approves-much-discussed-new-election-law-amid-opposition-concern-over-fraud-128834
• Erdoğan medya ile beyin yıkıyor. (2014, 19 August). Zaman, http://www.zaman.com.tr/gundem_erdogan-medya-ile-beyin-yikiyor_2238375.html
• Esen B., Gümüşçü S. (2017). A Small Yes for Presidentialism: The Turkish Constitutional Referendum of April 2017. South European Society and Politics 22 (3), 303 – 26.
• Ete H., Altunoğlu M., Dalay G. (2015). Turkey under the AK Party Rule: From Dominant Party Politics to Dominant Party System?, Insight Turkey, 17(4), 171 – 192.
• Fazekas, M., Tóth, I.J. (2016). From Corruption to State Capture: A New Analytical Framework with Empirical Applications from Hungary. Political Research Quarterly, 69(2), 320 – 334. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912916639137
• Furtak, F. T. (2017). Democracy Under Pressure: The Case of Poland, Hungary and Turkey. Journal of Civil & Legal Sciences, 06(02),
• Gilbert L., Mohseni P. (2011). Beyond Authoritarianism. The Conceptualization of Hybrid Regimes. Studies in Comparative International Development, 46, 270 – 297.
• Grabbe, H. (2015, 13 May). The deep roots of Macedonia’s current turmoil – and the way forward. https://www.opendemocracy.net/can-europe-make-it/heather-grabbe/deep-roots-of-macedonia%27s-current-turmoil-%E2%80%93-and-way-forward
• Ilonszki, G. (2007). From Minimal to Subordinate: A Final Verdict? The Hungarian Parliament, 1990 – 2002. The Journal of Legislative Studies 13(1), 38 – 58.
• Interview with Selim Erdem Aytaç (2018). Koç University, Istanbul, 22 March.
• Jenne, E.K., & Mudde, C. (2012). Can Outsiders Help? Journal of Democracy, 23(3), 147 – 155.
• Kalaycıoğlu E. (2002). Elections and governance. In: S. Sayarı (Ed.), Politics, parties and elections in Turkey. Boulder, London: Lynne Rienner, 55 – 72.
• Kalaycıoğlu E. (2015). Turkish Popular Presidential Elections: Deepening Legitimacy Issues and Looming Regime Change. South European Society and Politics, 20(2), 157 – 199.
• Kanun no. 6360. (2012). Kabul Tarihi: 12/11/2012, https://www.tbmm.gov.tr/kanunlar/k6360.html
• Less, T., Gjoni, R. (2016). Macedonia’s elections: how the EU continues to fail the Western Balkans. https://www.opendemocracy.net/can-europe-make-it/roland-gjoni-timothy-less/macedonia-s-elections-how-eus-continues-to-fail-western
• Ligeti, M., Mucsi, G., & Hortobágyi, E. (2014). Campaign Spending in Hungary: Total Eclipse. The Monitoring of Campaign Spending at the Parliamentary and Municipal Elections of 2014. Budapest: Transparency International Hungary.Marschall M., Aydoğan A., Bulut A. (2016). Does housing create votes? Explain­ing the electoral success of the AKP in Turkey. Electoral Studies, 42, 201 – 212.
• Mikucka-Wójtowicz, D. (2016). The 2014 Parliamentary Elections in Serbia – Refresh or Reset of the Political Landscape? ANNALES UNIVERSITATIS MARIAE CURIE-SKŁODOWSKA LUBLIN – POLONIA SECTIO M, 1.
• Musil P.A. (2015). Emergence of a Dominant Party System After Multipartyism: Theoretical Implications from the Case of the AKP in Turkey. South European Society and Politics, 20(1), 71 – 92.
• Norris P., Martínez i Coma F., Nai A., Grömping M. (2015). The World’s Flawed and Failed Contests. The Year in Elections, 2014. The Electoral Integrity Project, https://research.hks.harvard.edu/publications
• Norris P., Martínez i Coma F., Nai A., Grömping M. (2016). The Year in Elections, 2015: The expert survey on per­ceptions of electoral integrity. The Electoral Integrity Project, https://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/27030113
• Norris P. (2015). Why elections fail, New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Norris P. (2014). Why electoral integrity matters, New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Norris P. (2017). Strengthening Electoral Integrity, New York: Cambridge University Press.
• OSCE/ODIHR. (2011). Republic of Turkey. Parliamentary Elections 12 June 2011. Warsaw: OSCE/ODIHR.
• OSCE/ODIHR. (2014a). Hungary. Parliamentary Elections, 6 April 2014. OSCE/ODIHR Limited Election Observation Mission Final Report. Warsaw: OSCE/ODIHR.
• OSCE/ODIHR. (2014b). The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia. Presidential and Early Parliamentary Elections, 13 and 27 April 2014. OSCE/ODIHR Election Observation Mission Final Report. Warsaw: OSCE/ODIHR.
• OSCE/ODIHR. (2014c). Republic of Turkey, Presidential Election, 10 August 2014, OSCE/ODIHR Limited Election Observation Mission, Final Report. Warsaw: OSCE/ODIHR.
• OSCE/ODIHR. (2015). Republic of Turkey, Parliamentary Election, 7 June 2015, OSCE/ODIHR Limited Election Observation Mission, Final Report. Warsaw: OSCE/ODIHR.
• OSCE/ODIHR. (2016a). Republic of Serbia. Parliamentary Elections, 24 April 2016. OSCE/ODIHR Limited Election Observation Mission Final Report. Warsaw: OSCE/ODIHR.
• OSCE/ODIHR. (2016b). The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia. Early Parliamentary Elections, 11 December 2016. OSCE/ODIHR Election Observation Mission Final Report. Warsaw: OSCE/ODIHR.
• OSCE/ODIHR. (2016c). The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia. Early Parliamentary Elections, Sched­uled for 5 June 2016. OSCE/ODIHR Election Observation Mission Final Report. Warsaw: OSCE/ODIHR.
• OSCE/ODIHR. (2016d). Republic of Turkey. Early Parliamentary Elections, 1 November 2015, OSCE/ODIHR Limited Election Observation Mission. Final Report. Warsaw: OSCE/ODIHR.
• OSCE/ODIHR. (2017). Republic of Serbia. Presidential Elections, 2 April 2017. OSCE/ODIHR Election Assessment Mission Final Report. Warsaw: OSCE/ODIHR.
• OSCE/ODIHR. (2018a). Parliamentary Elections, 8 April 2018. OSCE/ODIHR Election Assessment Mission Final Report. Warsaw: OSCE/ODIHR.
• OSCE/ODIHR. (2018b). Republic of Turkey. Early Presidential and Parliamentary Elections, 24 June 2018, OSCE/ODIHR Election Observation Mission. Interim Report (24 May-13 June). Warsaw: OSCE/ODIHR.
• Petsinis, V. (2017). Enter Serbia’s ‘Orbán’? Aleksandar Vučić and his catch-all politics. https://www.opendemocracy.net/can-europe-make-it/vassilis-petsinis/enter-serbias-orb-n-aleksandar-vu-i-and-his-catch-all-politics
• Plattner M.F. (2015). Is Democracy in Decline?, Journal of Democracy, 26(1), 5 – 10.
• Pridham, G. (2007). Change and Continuity in the European Union’s Political Conditionality: Aims, Approach, and Priorities. Democratization, 14(3), 446 – 471.
• Rethink Institute (2014). Turkish Elections. Presidential Elections, Washington DC: Rethink Institute.
• Sayarı S. (2016). Back to a predominant party system: the November 2015 snap election in Turkey. South European Society and Politics, 21(2), 263 – 280.
• Sayarı, S. (2012). Political Parties. In M. Heper & S. Sayarı (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Modern Turkey. London and New York: Routledge.
• Schedler A. (2006). Electoral authoritarianism: the dynamics of unfree competition, Boulder, London: Lynne Rienner Publisher.
• Schedler A. (2002). The Menu of manipulation. Journal of Democracy, 13(2), 36 – 50.
• Schedler A. (2013). The politics of uncertainty: sustaining and subverting electoral authoritarianism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Schmitter P.C. (2015). Crisis and Transition, But Not a Decline. Journal of Democracy, 26(1), 32 – 44.
• Sedelmeier U. (2014). Anchoring Democracy from Above? The European Union and Democratic Backslid­ing in Hungary and Romania after Accession. Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(1), 105 – 121.
• Simpser A. (2013). Why governments and parties manipulate elections: Theory, practice, and complications, New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Stark, D., Vedres, B. (2012). Political Holes in the Economy: The Business Network of Partisan Firms in Hungary. American Sociological Review, 77(5), 700 – 722. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122412453921
• Stavrevska, E.B. (2015). Macedonia: anatomy of a crisis. https://www.opendemocracy.net/can-europe-make-it/elena-b-stavrevska/macedonia-anatomy-of-crisis
• Šišovski, J., & Kolozova, K. (2018). Macedonia: the authoritarian challenge to Europe. https://www.open­democracy.net/can-europe-make-it/jordan-%C5%A1i%C5%A1ovski-katerina-kolozova/macedonia-authoritarian-challenge-to-europe
• Taş H. (2015). Turkey – from tutelary to delegative democracy. Third World Quarterly, 36(4), 776 – 791.
• Tunç, H., Alperen Çıtak, H., Erdoğan, M., Yurtlu, F. & Ölmez, G. (2014). Seçim Sistemleri ve Türkiye›de (Gerrymandering) Seçim Hilesi Uygulamaları. Ankara: Adalet Yayınları
• Turkish gov’t cuts property taxes ahead of snap election. (2018, 7 May). Hurriyet Daily News, http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/turkish-govt-cuts-property-taxes-ahead-of-snap-election-131433
• Türsan H. (2004). Democratisation in Turkey: The role of political parties, Brussels: PIE-Peter Lang.
• Tüzun, S. (2014a). 30 İlde 2009’dan 2014’e Seçim Görünümü. http://bianet.org/bianet/siyaset/153857-30-ilde-2009-dan-2014-e-secim-gorunumu
• Tüzün, S. (2014b). Yerel Seçimlerde İstanbul. http://bianet.org/bianet/siyaset/154125-yerel-secimlerde-istanbul
• Wilkin, P. (2018). The Rise of ‘Illiberal’ Democracy: The Orbánization of Hungarian Political Culture. Journal of World-Systems Research, 24(1), 5 – 42.
• Wuthrich F.M. (2015). National Elections in Turkey: People, Politics, and the Party System. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.
• Yeni Türkiye Yeni Şehirler (2014). 04 Mart, https://www.akparti.org.tr/site/foto/60277/yeni-turkiye-yeni-sehirler
• Yılmaz G. (2016). Europeanization or De-Europeanization? Media Freedom in Turkey (1999 – 2015). South European Society and Politics, 21(1), 147 – 161.

Notes

Erratum: The figure on page 604 (i.e. 15-35%) was mentioned by the interviewed scholar with reference to the entire electorate targeted for vote buying, but a similar figure was given by other scholars as the percentage of votes received by the AKP through clientelism and patronage.