Wspólna struktura ludzkich dociekań w pragmatyce komunikacji prawniczej

• Authors: Osiejewicz Joanna

Title variants

EN

The common structure of human inquiry in the pragmatics of legal communication

• Languages of publication: PL

Abstracts

EN

A lawyer who wants to go beyond matrix thinking must develop some mental and practical agility. Understanding and applying John Dewey's experimental logic allows this agility to be achieved. His concept of experimental logic assumes that creativity and subjectivity are the foundation of the functioning of a complex system of legal institutions. Dewey introduces the concept of a common structure or pattern of human inquiry, which remains largely the same regardless of the issue to which it is applied. The pragmatic pattern of legal reasoning is therefore based on a more general pattern of human reasoning. The purpose of the article is to discuss this concept and to present its assumptions in relation to legal reasoning and legal communication.

Keywords

EN

legal communication;; experimental logic;; legal analysis;; legal reasoning;; pragmatics

• Publisher: Instytut Komunikacji Specjalistycznej i Interkulturowej
• Journal: Applied Linguistics Papers
• Year: 2019
• Issue: 26/3
• Pages: 51-61

Dates

published

2019-09-23

Contributors

author

Osiejewicz Joanna

• University of Warsaw

References

• Amabile, T.H. (1996), Creativity in Context: Update to the Social Psychology of Creativity. Londyn.
• Bix, B. (2004), Jurisprudence: Theory and Context. Durham.
• Dacey, J.S./ K.H. Lennon (1998), Understanding Creativity: The Interplay of Biological, Psychological and Social Factors. San Francisco.
• Dewey, J. (1910), How We Think. Boston, New Yourk. Chicago. (URL https://archive.org/stream/howwethink000838mbp/howwethink000838mbp_djvu.txt]. [Pobrano 23.01.2020].
• Dewey, J. (1924), Logical Method and the Law, (w:) „Cornell Law Review” 10 (17), 17–27.
• Dewey, J. (1938), Logic: The Theory of Inquiry. New York. (URL https://archive.org/stream/JohnDeweyLogicTheTheoryOfInquiry/%5BJohn_Dewey%5D_Logic_-_The_Theory_of_Inquiry_djvu.txt). [Pobrano 23.01.2020].
• Dyrda, A. (2018), Realizm prawniczy a pozytywizm prawniczy, (w:) „AVANT” 11(1). (DOI: 10.26913/90102018.0103.0004). [Pobrano 23.01.2020].
• Elkins, J. (1996), Thinking Like a Lawyer: Second Thoughts, (w:) „Mercer Law Review” 47, 511–523.
• Gilligan, C. (1993), In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development. Cambridge.
• Gilligan, C. (2014), Moral injury and the ethic of care: Reframing the Conversation about Differences, (w:) „Journal of Social Philosophy” 45(1), 89–106.
• Gladwell, M. (2008), Outliers: The Story of Success. Boston.
• Holmes, O.W. Jr. (1991), The Common Law. Mineola/New York.
• Krieger S./ R. Neumann (2015), Essential Lawyering Skills. New York.
• Levy, B.H. (1991), Anglo-American Philosophy of Law: An Introduction to Its Development and Outcome. New Jersey.
• MacCormick, N. (1983), On Legal Decisions and Their Consequences: From Dewey to Dworkin, (w:) „New York University Law Review” 58, 239–255.
• Mendell, M. (1994), Dewey and the Logic of Legal Reasoning, (w:) „Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society”, 30(3), 575–635.
• Muyumb, W. (2014), „All safety is an illusion”: John Dewey, James Baldwin, and the Democratic Practice of Public Critique, (w:) Trained Capacities: John Dewey, Rhetoric, and Democratic Practice. Columbia.
• Neustadt R.E./ E.R. May (1986), Thinking in Time: The Uses of History for DecisionMakers. New York.
• Osiejewicz, J. (2020), Transnational Legal Communication: Towards Comprehensible and Consistent Law, (w:) „Foundations of Science”. (URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-020-09655-3). [Pobrano 17.03.2020].
• Payton, S. (1985), Is Thinking Like a Lawyer Enough?, (w:) „University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform” 18, 233–236.
• Rand, J.W. (2003), Understanding Why Good Lawyers Go Bad: Using Case Studies in Teaching Cognitive Bias in Legal Decision-Making, (w:) „Clinical Law Review” 9, 751–752.
• Rorty, R. (1982), Consequences of Pragmatism: Essays 1972–1980. Minneapolis.

Identifiers

ISSN

2544-9354