Hiatus Resolution Mechanisms in Old English

• Authors: Mosionek Piotr , Zembrzuski Dariusz
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Old English has several strategies of hiatus resolution, which have received a lot of at- tention in different theoretical approaches. This article discusses these strategies from a constraint-based approach within Optimality Theory. The analysis relies mainly on the solutions proposed by Opalińska (2002; 2004; 2006), and reveals the hierarchy of preference between 4 strategies of hiatus resolution: contraction, diphthongisation, gliding, and glide insertion. It is shown that all mechanisms are a result of the interaction of differ- ent constraints. The article reveals that diphthongisation is the most optimal mechanism, whereas contraction occupies the last position due to the violation of weight preservation principle. The goal of this article is to advance Opalińska’s solution by demonstrating that the preference for a given hiatus resolution strategy results from the fact which particular subset of constraints is needed to activate this strategy.

Keywords

EN

moraic phonology,; Optimality Theory,; hiatus,; diphthongization,; weight preservation principle

• Publisher: Institute of English Studies, University of Warsaw
• Journal: Anglica. An International Journal of English Studies
• Year: 2019
• Issue: 28/2
• Pages: 5-23

Contributors

author

Mosionek Piotr

• University of Warsaw

author

Zembrzuski Dariusz

• University of Warsaw

References

• Barber, Peter. 2013. Sieversʼ Law and the History of Semivowel Syllabicity in IndoEuropean and Ancient Greek. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Campbell, Alistair. 1959. Old English Grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• Chomsky, Noam, and Morris Halle. 1968. The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row Publishers.
• Dresher, B. Elan, and Aditi Lahiri. 1999. “Open Syllable Lengthening in West Germanic.” Language 75: 678–719.
• Hayes, Bruce. 1989. “Compensatory Lengthening in Moraic Phonology.” Linguistic Inquiry 20: 353–306.
• Hock, Henrick Hans. 1986. “Compensatory Lengthening: In Defence of the Concept “mora”.” Folia Linguistica Historica 20: 431–460.
• Hogg, Richard M. 1992. A Grammar of Old English. Vol. 1: Phonology. Oxford: Blackwell.
• Hogg, Richard M. 2011. A Grammar of Old English. Vol.1 : Phonology. Oxford: Blackwell.
• Keyser, Samuel Jay. 1975. “Metathesis and Old English Phonology.” Linguistic Inquiry 6.3: 377–411.
• Kiparsky, Paul, and Wayne O’Neil. 1976. “The Phonology of Old English Inflections.” Linguistic Inquiry 7: 527–557.
• Kiparsky, Paul. 1998. “Siever’s Law as Prosodic Optimization.” Mir Curad: Studies in Honor of Calvert Watkins. Ed. Jay Jasanoff , H. Craig Melchert, and Lisi Olivier. Innsbruck: Insbrücker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft. 1–14.
• Lass, Roger, and John M. Anderson 1975. Old English Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Lass, Roger. 1994. Old English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• McCarthy, John J., and Alan Prince. 1995. “Faithfulness and Reduplicative Identity.” Papers in Optimality Theory. University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers 18. Ed. Jill Beckman, Laura W. Dickey, and Suzanne Urbanczyk. Amherst: Graduate Linguistic Student Association. 249–384.
• Opalińska, Monika. 2002. Compensatory Lengthening, Velar Fricatives, and Hiatus in Old English. PhD Diss, Warsaw.
• Opalińska, Monika. 2004. “Compensatory Lengthening in Old English.” Folia Linguistica Historica 25: 235–251.
• Opalińska, Monika. 2006. “Contraction and Lengthening in Old English.” Studies in Constraint-Based Phonology. Warsaw: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego: 111–132.
• Prince, Alan, and Paul Smolensky. 1993. Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction Generative Grammar. Rutgers: Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science.
• Prokosch, Eduard. 1939. A Comparative Germanic Grammar. Baltimore: Linguistic Society of America.
• Trask, Robert Lawrence. 1996. Dictionary of Phonetics and Phonology. London and New York: Taylor & Francis Routledge.