Student Perception of Teacher Empathy, High Regard and Genuineness and the Impact on Student Engagement

• Authors: Bockmier-Sommers Denise , Chen Cheng-Chia "Brian" , Martsch Martin
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

One of the main challenges for online instructors involves developing relationships with students. Current research in student engagement has conceptualized this process according to four areas: skill engagement, interaction engagement, emotional engagement, and performance engagement. In an effort to be more focused and to highlight the relationship-building aspect of engagement, the work of Carl Rogers can be applied in these settings by emphasizing empathy, genuineness, and high regard. This study sought to examine the relationship between student engagement and these Rogerian characteristics. Students (n=185) completed an online survey that included the Student Course Engagement Questionnaire and the Barrett-Leonard Relationship Inventory. The results demonstrated that empathy and high regard were significantly correlated with all four engagement areas, and genuineness was significantly correlated with three: interaction, emotional, and performance engagement. As hypothesized, empathy and high regard exhibited the strongest relationships with interaction engagement and emotional engagement. These findings suggest that student engagement (interaction and emotional) does capture aspects of these relationship-building variables. It also suggests that more can be done to measure and implement empathy, genuineness, and high regard skills in online teaching for more effective instruction.

• Publisher: Szkoła Główna Handlowa w Warszawie
• Journal: e-mentor
• Year: 2017
• Issue: 3 (70)
• Pages: 66-72

Dates

published

2017

Contributors

author

Bockmier-Sommers Denise

author

Chen Cheng-Chia "Brian"

author

Martsch Martin

References

• Aragon, S.R. (2003). Creating social presence in online environments. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2003(100), 57-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ace.119
• Aspy, D.N., & Roebuck, F.N. (1998). Carl Roger's contributions to education. Person-Centered Review, 3(1), 10-18.
• Barrett-Lennard, G.T. (2015). The relationship inventory: A complete resource and guide. Massachusetts: John Wiley & Sons.
• Brooks, C.F., & Young, S.L. (2015). Emotion in online college classrooms: Examining the influence of perceived teacher communication behaviour on students' emotional experiences. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 24(4), 515-527. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2014.995215
• Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155-159. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
• Davey, G., Sterling, C., & Field, A. (2014). Complete psychology (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
• Davis, J. (1971). Elementary survey analysis. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
• Dixson, M.D. (2012). Creating effective student engagement in online courses: What do students find engaging. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 16(2), 1-13.
• Fuller, R.G. (2012). Building empathy in online courses: Effective practical approaches. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 8(4), 38-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/jicte.2012100104
• Handelsman, M.M., Briggs, W.L., Sullivan, N., & Towler, A. (2005). A measure of college student engagement. The Journal of Educational Research, 98(3), 184-192.
• Heuett, J.B. (ed., 2012). The Next Generation of Distance Education: Unconstrained learning. Springer Business-Science Media, 97-125.
• Lyon, H.C., & Tausch, R.Jr. (Eds.). (2014). On becoming an effective teacher: Person-centered teaching, psychology, philosophy, and dialogues with Carl R. Rogers and Harold Lyon. New York, NY: Routledge.
• Mandernach, B.J. (2015), Assessment of student engagement in higher education: A synthesis of literature and assessment tools. Teaching and Educational Research, 12(2), 1-14.
• Moore, M., & Kearsley, G. (2004). Distance education: A systems view. Belmont CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
• Motschnig-Pitrik, R. (2005). Person-centered e-learning in action: Can technology help to manifest Person-Centered values in academic environments. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 45(4), 503-530. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022167805279816
• O'Sullivan, P.B., Hunt, S.K., & Lippert, L.R. (2004). Mediated immediacy: A language of affiliation in a technological age. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 23(4), 464-490.
• Reese, S.A. (2015). Online learning environments in higher education: Connectivism vs. dissociation. Education Information Technology, 20(3), 579-588. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10639-013-9303-7
• Richardson, J.C., Arbaugh, J.B., Cleveland-Innes, M., Ice, P., Swan, K.P., & Garrison, D.R. (2012). Using the community of inquiry framework to inform effective instructional design, In: L. Moller. J. B. Heuett (eds.). The Next Generation of Distance Education.
• Rogers, C.R. (1969). Freedom to learn. Columbus, OH: Merrill Publishing Company.
• Rogers, C.R., Lyon, H.C. Jr., & Tausch, R. (2014). On becoming an effective teacher: Person-centered teaching, psychology, philosophy, and dialogues with Carl R. New York, NY: Routledge.
• Tausch, R., & Hüls, R. (2013). Students, patients, and employees cry out for empathy, In: C.R. Rogers., H.C. Lyon, Jr., & R. Tausch (Eds), (2014). On becoming an effective teacher: Person-centered teaching, psychology, philosophy, and dialogues with Carl R. Rogers, New York, NY: Routledge.

Identifiers

DOI

10.15219/em70.1310