‘What to wear?’: Clothing as an example of expression and intentionality

• Authors: King Ian W.
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

I will argue here that for many of us the act of dressing our bodies is evidence of intentional expression before different audiences. It is important to appreciate that intentionality enables us to understand how and why we act the way we do. The novel (and potentially significant) contribution this paper makes to this examination is employing clothing as a means of revealing the characteristics of intentionality. In that, it is rare to identify one exemplar that successfully captures the relationships between the cognitive and physical characteristics of its application. Nevertheless, this paper will not attempt to fully encompass the traditional approaches associated with this concept but instead employ both the early and later writings of French phenomenologist Maurice Merleau‑Ponty and his claim that our lived bodies are an expressive space from which we act intentionally. In other words (and this is critical for the approach of this paper), that the manner by which we dress our bodies is likely to offer a significant means of revealing the character of intentionality in everyday life and by this, claim that clothing can communicate. Accordingly, this first‑person account closely examines both the cognitive and physical experience of a simple clothing example: ‘what to wear?’ and the experience of an everyday clothing purchase in a store and its subsequent impact when the item of clothing is worn for different audiences. The ensuing discussion systematically examines the significance of marrying Merleau‑Ponty’s writings with this everyday example through private and public audiences and in abstract and public spaces.

Keywords

EN

Maurice Merleau‑Ponty; reversibility; dress; expression; intentionality; bodily communication; public audience

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Pedagogiczny im. KEN w Krakowie, Instytut Filozofii i Socjologii
• Journal: ARGUMENT: Biannual Philosophical Journal
• Year: 2015
• Volume: Tom: 5
• Issue: Numer: 1
• Pages: 59-78

Dates

published

2015

Contributors

author

King Ian W.

• London College of Fashion and University of the Arts, United Kingdom

References

• Barbaras, R. (2004). The being of the phenomenon: Merleau‑Ponty’s ontology. (T. Toadvine & L. Lawlor, Trans.). Bloomington–Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
• Brentano, F. (1973). Psychology from an empirical standpoint. (A. C. Rancurello, D. B. Terell,& L. L. McAlister, Trans). London: Routledge Keegan Paul.
• Cixous, H. (1994). Sonia Rykiel in translation. In: Sh. Benstock & S. Ferriss (Eds.). On fashion (pp. 95–99). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
• Carman, T. (2008). Merleau‑Ponty. London–New York: Routledge.
• Cataldi, S. L. (1993). Emotion, depth, and flesh: A study of sensitive space. New York: State University of New York Press.
• Crane, J. (2000). Fashion and its social agendas: Class, gender, and identity in clothing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Crawley, M. (2003). Dress (1st ed.: 1912). Reproduced in: K. K. P. Johnson, S. J. Torntore,J. B. Eicher (Eds.). Fashion foundations: Early writings on fashion and dress. New York: Berg Publishers.
• Davis, F. (1993). Fashion, culture and identity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Dillon, M. C. (1988). Merleau‑Ponty’s ontology. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
• Eicher, J. B. & Roach‑Higgins, M. E. (1992). Definition and classification of dress: Implications for analysis of gender roles. In: R. Barnes & J. B. Eicher (Eds.). Dress and gender: Making and meaning (pp. 8–28). Oxford–New York: Berg Publishers.
• Evans, F. (2008). Chiasm and flesh. In: R. Diprose & J. Reynolds (Eds.). Merleau‑Ponty: Key concepts (pp. 184–193). Stocksfield: Acumen Publishing.
• Entwistle, J. (2000). Fashion and the fleshy body: Dress as embodied practice. Fashion Theory: The Journal of Dress, Body & Culture, 4(3), 323–348.
• Husserl, E. (1980). Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy. Vol. 3: Phenomenology and the foundations of the sciences. (T. E. Klein & W. E. Pohl, Trans.). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
• Kwant, R. C. (1966). From phenomenology to metaphysics: An inquiry into the last period of Merleau‑Ponty’s philosophical life. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.
• Merleau‑Ponty, M. (1945/1962). Phenomenology of perception. (C. Smith, Trans.). New York–London: Humanities Press / Routledge & Kegan Paul.
• Merleau‑Ponty, M. (1964). The philosopher and his shadow. In: M. Merleau‑Ponty, Signs (pp. 159–181). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
• Merleau‑Ponty, M. (1968). Visible and invisible. (A. Lingis, Trans.). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
• Montaigne de, M. (2003). Origins and motives of the custom of wearing clothes (1st ed.: 1575). Reprinted in: K. K. P. Johnson, S. J. Torntore, J. B. Eicher (Eds.). Fashion foundations: Early writings on fashion and dress. New York: Berg Publishers.
• Oxford English dictionary — http://www.oed.com.
• Polhemus, T. (1988). Bodystyles. Luton: Lennard. Polhemus, T. & Proctor, L. (1978). Fashion and anti‑fashion: An anthology of clothing and
• adornment. London: Cox & Wyman.
• Reuter, M. (1999). Merleau‑Ponty’s notion of pre‑reflective intentionality. Synthese, 118, 69–88.
• Singer, L. (1981). Merleau‑Ponty on the concept of style. Man and World, 14, 153–163. Reprinted in: G. Johnson (Ed.). (1993). The Merleau‑Ponty aesthetics reader: Philosophy and painting. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
• Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy — http://plato.stanford.edu.
• Stawarska, B. (2002). Reversibility and intersubjectivity in Merleau‑Ponty’s ontology. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 33(2), 155–166.
• Twigg, J. (2007). Clothing, age and the body: A critical review. Ageing & Society, 27, 285–305.
• Twigg, J. (2009). Clothing, identity and the embodiment of age. In: J. Powell & T. Gilbert (Eds.). Aging and identity: A postmodern dialogue (pp. 93–104). New York: Nova Science Publishers.
• Van Ness Dearborn, G. (2003). Physical connections between the body and dress. The psychology of clothing (1st ed.: 1918). Reprinted in: K. K. P. Johnson, S. J. Torntore, & J. B. Eicher (Eds.). Fashion foundations: Early writings on fashion and dress. New York: Berg Publishers.