The Dispute over Delayed Animation: When Does a Human Being Begin?

• Authors: Maryniarczyk Andrzej
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The dispute over delayed animation, although it has its beginnings already in ancient philosophy and culture, started for good only in contemporary times when the right to kill unborn children (so-called abortion) entered the canon of constitutional law and, what is even stranger, started to be proposed for inclusion into basic human rights. Despite being discussed nowadays mainly in medical and legal sciences, the problem involves disputes of an ethical, religious and ideological nature. In these discussions one can notice a clear lack of anthropological and metaphysical argumentation that would address the question about the beginning of the human being (which entails the question about the beginning of being per se) in the light of common properties that belong to really existing beings, and the metaphysical laws that govern the manner in which things (including human embryos) exist. This article discusses understandings of the human being as they are found in Plato’s, Aristotle’s and Thomas Aquinas’s philosophical anthropology. It is this triad of approaches: Platonic, Aristotelian and Thomistic, that allows one both to notice the specificity of Aquinas’s approach and to resolve the dispute concerning delayed animation.

Keywords

EN

Plato; Aristotle; Thomas Aquinas; delayed animation; soul; ensoulment; abortion; anthropology; metaphysics; human being; human embryo

• Publisher: International Étienne Gilson Society
• Journal: Studia Gilsoniana
• Year: 2020
• Volume: 9
• Issue: 3
• Pages: 423-465

Dates

published

2020-09-30

Contributors

author

Maryniarczyk Andrzej

• John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland

References

• Aquinas, Thomas. De Ente et Essentia. 1965. Adapted and html-edited by Joseph Kenny, O.P. Available online at: https://isidore.co/aquinas/DeEnte&Essentia.htm. Accessed Jan. 26, 2020.
• Aquinas, Thomas. Quaestio disputata de anima. Available online at: https://www.corpusthomisticum.org/qda01.html. Accessed Jan. 26, 2020.
• Aquinas, Thomas. Quaestiones disputatae de potentia. Available online at: https://www.corpusthomisticum.org/qdp7.html. Accessed Jan. 26, 2020.
• Aquinas, Thomas. Quaestio disputata de spiritualibus creaturis. Available online at: https://www.corpusthomisticum.org/qds.html. Accessed Jan. 26, 2020.
• Aquinas, Thomas. Scriptum super quatuor libros Sententiarum Magistri Petri Lombardi Episcopi Parisiensis. In Sancti Thomae de Aquino. Opera omnia, vol. 6–8. Parma 1856–1858.
• Aquinas, Thomas. Summa contra Gentiles. The Latin version available online at: https://www.corpusthomisticum.org/scg2056.html. The English version, translated by J. F. Anderson, available online at: https://isidore.co/aquinas/english/ContraGentiles2.htm#7. Accessed Jan. 26, 2020.
• Aquinas, Thomas. Summa Theologiae. Available online at: https://aquinas.cc/la/en/~ST.I. Accessed Jan. 26, 2020.
• Aristotle. De Anima. Translated by D. W. Hamlyn. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2002.
• Aristotle. Generation of Animals. Translated by A. L. Peck. London: William Heinemann Ltd.; Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1943.
• Aristotle. Metaphysics. Translated by W. D. Ross. Available online at: http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/metaphysics.html. Accessed Jan. 26, 2020.
• Aristotle. Physics, vol. I, books 1–4. Translated by P. H. Wicksteed and F. M. Cornford. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1957.
• Aristotle. Politics. Translated by B. Jowett. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1885.
• Aristotle. Protrepticus or Exhortation to Philosophy. Edited and translated by D. S. Hutchinson and Monte Ransome Johnson. 2017. Available online at: http://www.protrepticus.info/protr2017x20.pdf. Accessed Jan. 26, 2020.
• Blechschmidt, E. “Zur Personalität des Menschen.” Communio 11 (1982): 171–181.
• Böckle, F. “Probleme um den Lebensbeginn. Medizinisch-ethische Aspekte.” In Handbuch der christlichen Ethik, vol. II, 36–59. Freiburg in Br. 1978.
• Conley, J. J. “Delayed Animation: An Ambiguity and Its Abuses.” In Life and Learning XII, edited by J. W. Koterski, 159–168. Washington, D.C.: University Faculty for Life, 2003.
• Czachorowski, M. “Abortion in The Universal Encyclopedia of Philosophy,” Studia Gilsoniana 7, no. 4 (October–December 2018): 567–578, DOI: 10.26385/SG.070429.
• Czupryn, B. “Komensuracja [Commensuration].” In Powszechna Encyklopedia Filozofii, vol. 5, edited by A. Maryniarczyk, 738–739. Lublin: PTTA, 2004.
• Ford, N. M. When Did I Begin? Conception of the Human Individual in History, Philosophy, and Science. Cambridge 1991.
• Jaroszyński, P. “Beauty in The Universal Encyclopedia of Philosophy.” Studia Gilsoniana 7, no. 4 (October–December 2018): 579–595, DOI: 10.26385/SG.070430.
• Jones, D. A. The Soul of the Embryo: An Enquiry into the Status of the Human Embryo in the Christian Tradition. London and New York: Continuum, 2004.
• Krąpiec, M. A. I—Man. An Outline of Philosophical Anthropology. Translated by M. Lescoe et al. New Britain, Conn.: Mariel Publications, 1983.
• Krąpiec, M. A. Ja – człowiek [I – Man]. Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL, 2005.
• Krąpiec, M. A. “Man in The Universal Encyclopedia of Philosophy,” Studia Gilsoniana 7, no. 4 (October–December 2018): 597–664, DOI: 10.26385/SG.070431.
• Maryniarczyk, A. “On the Transcendental Properties of Real Beings.” Translated by H. McDonald. Studia Gilsoniana 5, no. 2 (April–June 2016): 429–444.
• Maryniarczyk, A. System metafizyki. Analiza ‘przedmiotowo-zbornego’ poznania [System of Metaphysics: An Analysis of ‘Objective-Carrying’ Knowledge]. Lublin: RW KUL, 1991.
• Muszala, A., and J. Bątkiewicz-Brożek. “In vitro: Gorszy start [In Vitro: A Worse Start].” Gość Niedzielny, no. 30 (July 29, 2012): 22.
• Ostasz, L. Rozumienie człowieka. Antropologia filozoficzna [The Understanding of Man. Philosophical Anthropology]. Olsztyn 2003.
• Plato. Cratylus. Translated by B. Jowett. Cambridge University Press, 1990.
• Siwek, P. “Wstęp [Introduction].” In Arystoteles [Aristotle], O duszy [De Anima], 7–44. Translated by P. Siwek. Warszawa [Warsaw]: PWN, 1988.
• Swieżawski, S. “Centralne zagadnienia tomistycznej nauki o duszy [Central Issues of the Thomistic Doctrine of the Soul] (Commensuratio animae ad hoc corpus).” Przegląd Filozoficzny 44, no. 1–3 (1948): 148–154 and 172–189.
• Swieżawski, S. “Objaśnienia [Glosses].” In Święty Tomasz z Akwinu [Saint Thomas Aquinas]. Traktat o człowieku [Treatise on Man], 723–768. Kęty: Antyk, 1998.
• Swieżawski, S. Święty Tomasz na nowo odczytany [Saint Thomas Reread]. Poznań: W drodze, 1995.
• Ślipko, T. Zarys etyki szczegółowej. Etyka osobowa [Outline of Specific Ethics. A Personal Ethics], vol. 1. Kraków 2005.
• Valverde, C. Antropologia filozoficzna [Philosophical Anthropology]. Translated by G. Ostrowski. Poznań 1998.
• Zampas, Ch., and J. Gher. “Abortion as a Human Right – International and Regional Standards.” Human Rights Law Review 8, no. 2 (2008): 249–294, DOI: 10.1093/hrlr/ngn008.

Identifiers

ISSN

2300-0066

ISSN

2577-0314

DOI

10.26385/SG.090317