Społeczne podstawy systemu partyjnego – zarys tematyki w perspektywie Polski

• Authors: Kamiński Paweł

Title variants

EN

The social foundations of the party system: the outline and the case of Poland

• Languages of publication: PL

Abstracts

EN

This paper presents the ongoing discussion about Polish party system formation and its foundations among society. It also reviews the the literature that has studied the origins of cleavage based party systems, originally presented by Lipset and Rokkan, as well as theoretical and empirical assessments. For a long period of time Polish party system was depicted as very unstable, lacking any sign of institutionalization and where voters had showed no strong ties to political parties. This paper presents an argument that since 2004 this situation has started to change. In the second part of the review it is suggested that the current state of the Polish party system gives us strong indications that the new cleavage may have come into being, namely, between liberal and solidarity values, which convincingly correlates with electorates of two biggest parties: Law and Justice (PiS) and Civic Platform (PO).

Keywords

EN

Poland; political parties; party system; cleavages

• Publisher: Księgarnia Akademicka
• Journal: Politeja : Pismo Wydziału Studiów Miedzynarodowych i Politycznych Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
• Year: 2014
• Issue: 6(32)
• Pages: 223-240

Contributors

author

Kamiński Paweł

• Uniwersytet Jagielloński

References

• Bartolini S., Mair P., Identity, Competition, and Electoral Availability. The Stabilisation of European Electorates 1885‑1985, Cambridge–New York 1990.
• Biezen I. van, Caramani D., Cleavage Structuring in Western vs Central and Eastern Europe: State Formation, Nation‑Building and Economic Modernization, Paper presented at the ECPR Joint Sessions, Helsinki 2007.
• Brusis M., Party Strategies and Administrative‑Territorial Reforms in Poland, „West European Politics” 2013, Vol. 36, nr 2, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2013.749664.
• Budge I. i in., Mapping Policy Preferences. Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments 1945‑1998, Oxford 2001.
• Collier R.B., Collier D., Shaping the Political Arena. Critical Junctures, the Labor Movement, and Regime Dynamics in Latin America, Princeton 1991.
• Cześnik M., Kotnarowski M., Nowy wymiar politycznego współzawodnictwa: Polska solidarna versus Polska liberalna, „Studia Polityczne” 2011, nr 27.
• Electoral Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Realignment or Dealignment?, red. R.J. Dalton, S.C. Flanagan, P.A. Beck, Princeton 1984.
• Electoral Change. Responses to Evolving Social and Attitudinal Structures in Western Countries, red. M.N. Franklin i in., Cambridge 1992.
• Freire A., Bringing Social Identities Back In: The Social Anchors of Left‑Right Orientation in Western Europe, „International Political Science Review” 2006, Vol. 27, nr 4, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0192512106067358.
• Grabowska M., Podział postkomunistyczny. Społeczne podstawy polityki w Polsce po 1989 roku, Warszawa 2004.
• Grabowska M., Szawiel T., Budowanie demokracji. Podziały społeczne, partie polityczne i społeczeństwo obywatelskie w postkomunistycznej Polsce, Warszawa 2001.
• Herbut R., Podziały polityczne w Europie Zachodniej. Charakter i struktura, [w:] Demokracje zachodnioeuropejskie. Analiza porównawcza, red. A. Antoszewski, R. Herbut, Wrocław 1997.
• Huntington S.P., Political Order in Changing Societies, New Haven 2006.
• Inglehart R., The Silent Revolution. Changing Values and Political Styles among Western Publics, Princeton 1977.
• Jasiewicz K., „The Past is Never Dead”. Identity, Class, and Voting Behavior in Contemporary Poland, „East European Politics and Societies” 2009, Vol. 23, nr 4, [online] http://dx.doi. org/10.1177/0888325409342114.
• Jungerstam‑Mulders S., Parties and Party System in the Post‑communist EU Member States. Comparative Aspects, [w:] Post‑communist EU Member States. Parties and Party Systems, red. taż, Aldershot 2006.
• Kitschelt H., The Transformation of European Social Democracy, Cambridge 1994, Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics.
• Kitschelt H., McGann A., The Radical Right in Western Europe. A Comparative Analysis, Ann Arbor 1995.
• Kitschelt H. i in., Post‑Communist Party Systems. Competition, Representation, and Inter‑Party Cooperation, Cambridge 1999, Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics.
• Knutsen O., Scarbrough E., Cleavage Politics, [w:] The Impact of Values, red. J. van Deth, E. Scarbrough, Oxford 1995, Beliefs in Government, 4.
• Mainwarimg S., Scully T., Party Systems in Latin America, [w:] Building Democratic Institutions. Party Systems in Latin America, red. ciż, Stanford 1995.
• Mair P., Party System Change. Approaches and Interpretations, Oxford 1998.
• Markowski R., The 2007 Polish Parliamentary Election: Some Structuring, Still a Lot of Chaos, „West European Politics” 2008, Vol. 31, nr 5, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01402380802234763.
• Markowski R., The Polish Elections of 2005: Pure Chaos or a Restructuring of the Party System?, „West European Politics” 2006, Vol. 29, nr 4, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01402380600842452.
• Markowski R., Rozłamy socjopolityczne: o zamyśle klasyków, o tym, jak ich rozumiano, poprawiano i testowano, „Studia Polityczne” 2000, nr 10.
• Markowski R., Cześnik M., Wybory parlamentarne w 2007 roku – ciągły zamęt czy utrwalenie nowego rozłamu?, „Studia Polityczne” 2011, nr 27.
• Matyja R., Rywalizacja polityczna w Polsce, Kraków 2013, Biblioteka Myśli Politycznej, 90.
• Rokkan S., State Formation, Nation‑Building, and Mass Politics in Europe. The Theory of Stein
• Rokkan. Based on His Collected Works, red. P. Flora, S. Kuhnle, D. Urwin, Oxford 1999, Comparative European Politics.
• Rokkan S. i in., Citizens, Elections, Parties. Approaches to the Comparative Study of the Processes of Development, Oslo 1970, Comparative Studies of Political Life, 1.Rose R., Munro N., Parties and Elections in New European Democracies, Colchester 2009, ECPR Press.
• Sartori G., Comparative Constitutional Engineering. An Inquiry into Structures, Incentives and Outcomes, New York 1994.
• Sartori G., Parties and Party Systems. A Framework for Analysis, Colchester 2005, ECPR Classics. Seminarium Partycypacja wyborcza Polaków. Zapis stenograficzny, Warszawa, 24 VI 2008 r., Instytut Spraw Publicznych, [online] http://www.isp.org.pl/files/17054281860651237001217410726.pdf.
• Szotkiewicz A., Cienie w nawie, „Polityka” 2012, 28 VIII, [online] http://www.polityka.pl/tygodnikpolityka/kraj/1529759,1,kryzys‑wiary‑w‑czasach‑kryzysu.read.
• Whitefield S., Political Cleavages and Post‑Communist Politics, „Annual Review of Political Science” 2000, Vol. 5, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.5.112601. 144242.
• Witkowski M., Kategoria dyslokacji w analizie zmian zachodzących w polskim dyskursie publicznym po katastrofie w Smoleńsku, „Studia Socjologiczne” 2012, nr 1.
• Wybory 2011 do Sejmu i Senatu Rezczypospolitej Polskiej, PKW, [online] http://wybory2011.pkw.gov.pl/wyn/pl/000000.html#tabs‑1.
• Zuckerman A., Political Cleavage: A Conceptual and Theoretical Analysis, „British Journal of Political Science” 1975, Vol. 5, nr 2, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400008140.

Identifiers

DOI

10.12797/Politeja.11.2014.32.13