Zaangażowanie w pracę – problemy z pomiarem

• Authors: Kulikowski Konrad , Madej Magdalena

Title variants

EN

The measurement of work engagement – problems and issues

• Languages of publication: PL

Abstracts

PL

Celem prezentowanych badań było sprawdzenie przydatności do pomiaru zaangażowania w pracę 17-itemowego kwestionariusza Praca Samopoczucie (The Utrecht Work Engagement Scale – UWES), który w wersji oryginalnej zawiera trzy podskale: wigor (vigor), zaabsorbowanie (absorbtion) oraz oddanie się pracy (dedication). W badanej próbie wykształconych Polaków (N=142) trzy podskale były wysoko skorelowane, co wskazuje na jednoczynnikową strukturę narzędzia. Przetestowano także dwie skrócone wersje 9-itemowe. Najlepsze własności psychometryczne miała 9-itemowa skala stworzona na podstawie analizy kowariancji danych z badanej próby. Jako miarę trafności wskaźnika zaangażowania w pracę potraktowano związek z charakterem czasu pracy. Zgodnie z przewidywaniami, pracownicy mający czas pracy o charakterze zmiennym byli bardziej zaangażowani niż pracownicy o czasie pracy stałym.

EN

The aim of this study was to examine utility of The Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES) as a tool to measure work engagement. The original version of UWES contains 17 items grouped in three subscales: vigor, absorption and dedication. In the sample of educated Polish people (N = 146) three subscales were highly correlated, indicating that the structure of UWES is rather one than three dimensional. We also tested two shortened 9-items UWES versions. Best psychometric properties (goodness of fit) had 9-items scale developed on the basis of confirmatory factor analysis conducted on collected data. The validity of the UWES was investigated by studying its relationship with work arrangements (variable vs. fixed). As expected, employees with variable work arrangements were more engaged than those with fixed arrangements.

Keywords

PL

pomiar zaangażowania w pracę; czas pracy; UWES

EN

work engagement measurement; UWES; work arrangements

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydział Nauk Ekonomicznych
• Journal: Problemy Zarządzania
• Year: 2014
• Issue: 1/2014 (45)
• Pages: 99-112

Dates

published

2014-01-30

Contributors

author

Kulikowski Konrad

• Instytut Psychologii, Uniwersytet Jagielloński.

author

Madej Magdalena

• Instytut Psychologii Stosowanej, Uniwersytet Jagielloński.

References

• Baka, L. i Cieślak, R. (2010). Zależności miedzy stresorami w pracy a wypaleniem zawodowym i zaangażowaniem w prace w grupie nauczycieli: pośrednicząca rola przekonań o własnej skuteczności i wsparcia społecznego. Studia Psychologiczne, 48, 5–18.
• Bakker, A.B. i Bal, M.P. (2010). Weekly Work Engagement and Performance: A Study among Starting Teachers. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83 (1), 189–206, http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/096317909X402596.
• Bakker, A.B. i Demerouti, E. (2007). The Job Demands-Resources Model: State of the Art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22, 309–328, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115.
• Bakker, A.B. i Demerouti, E. (2008). Towards a Model of Work Engagement. Career Development International, 13, 209–223, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13620430810870476.
• Balducci, C., Fraccaroli, F. i Schaufeli, W.B. (2010). Psychometric Properties of the Italian Version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES-9): A Cross-cultural Analysis. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 26 (2), 143–149, http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000020.
• Bates, S. (2004). Getting Engaged. HR Magazine, 49 (2).
• Baumruk, R. (2006). Why Managers Are Crucial to Increasing Engagement: Identifying Steps Managers Can Take to Engage Their Workforce. Strategic HR Review, 5 (2), 24–27, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14754390680000863.
• Britt, T.W. (1999). Engaging the Self in the Field: Testing the Triangle Model of Responsibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 696–706, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167299025006005.
• Britt, T.W., Thomas, J.L. i Dawson, C.R. (2006). Self-Engagement Magnifies the Relationship between Qualitative Overload and Performance in a Training Setting.
• Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 2100–2114, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00096.x.
• Christian, M.S., Garza, A.S. i Slaughter, J.E. (2011). Work Engagement: A Quantitative
• Review and Test of Its Relations with Task and Contextual Performance. Personnel
• Psychology, 64 (1), 89–136, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01203.x.
• Csíkszentmihályi, M. (2005). Przepływ: jak poprawić jakość życia: psychologia optymalnego doświadczenia. Taszów: Biblioteka Moderatora.
• Demerouti, E., Bakker, A.B., Nachreiner, F. i Schaufeli, W.B. (2001). The Job Demands- Resources Model of Burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86 (3), 499–512, http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499. Gallup. (2008). Employee Disengagement Plagues Germany. Gallup Business Journal.
• Pozyskano z: http://businessjournal.gallup.com/content/117376/Employee-Disengagement- Plagues-Germany.aspx#2 (26.09.2013).
• George, J.M. (2010). More Engagement Is Not Necessarily Better: The Benefits of Fluctuating Levels of Engagement. W: S. Albrecht (red.), The Handbook of Employee Engagement: Perspectives, Issues, Research, and Practice (s. 253–263). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
• Halbesleben, J.R.B. (2011). The Consequences of Engagement: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20 (1), 68–73, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2010.514327.
• Halbesleben, J.R.B. i Wheeler, A.R. (2008). The Relative Roles of Engagement and Embeddedness in Predicting Job Performance and Intention to Leave. Work and Stress, 22, 242–256, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02678370802383962.
• Hallberg, U.E. i Schaufeli, W.B. (2006). „Same Same” but Different? Can Work Engagement Be Discriminated from Job Involvement and Organizational Commitment? European Psychologist, 11 (2), 19–127, http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.11.2.119.
• Harter, J.K., Schmidt, F.L. i Hayes, T.L. (2002). Business-Unit-Level Relationship between Employee Satisfaction, Employee Engagement, and Business Outcomes: A Metaanalysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87 (2), 268–279.
• Harter, J.K., Schmidt, F.L., Killham, E.A. i Asplund, J.W. (2006). Q12 Meta-Analysis. Omaha: Gallup.
• Ho, V.T., Wong, S.S. i Lee, C.H. (2011). A Tale of Passion: Linking Job Passion and Cognitive Engagement to Employee Work Performance. Journal of Management Studies, 48 (1), 26–47, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00878.x.
• Kahn, W.A. (1990). Psychological condition of Personal Engagement and Disengagement at Work. Academy of Management Journal, 33 (4), 692–724.
• Kruse, K. (2012). What is Employee Engagement. Forbes. Pozyskano z: http://www.forbes.com/sites/kevinkruse/2012/06/22/employee-engagement-what-and-why/ (21.09.2013).
• Kuhnel, J., Sonnentag, S. i Bledow, R. (2012). Resources and Time Pressure as Day-Level Antecedents of Work Engagement. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 85, 181–198, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.2011.02022.x.
• Littman-Ovadia, H. i Balducci, C. (2013). Psychometric Properties of the Hebrew Version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES-9). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 29 (1), 58–63, http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000121.
• Maslach, Ch., Schaufeli, W.B. i Leiter, M.P. (2001). Job Burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52 (1), 397–422, http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.397.
• Morgeson, F.P., Delaney-Klinger, K. i Hemingway, M.A. (2005). The Importance of Job Autonomy, Cognitive Ability, and Job-related Skill for Predicting Role Breadth and Job Performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 399–406, http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.2.399.
• Nerstad, C.G., Richardsen, A.M. i Martinussen, M. (2010). Factorial Validity of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES) across Occupational Groups in Norway. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 51 (4), 326–333, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2009.00770.x.
• Robinson, D., Perryman, S. i Hayday, S. (2004). The Drivers of Employee Engagement Report 408. Institute for Employment Studies. Pozyskano z: http://www.employmentstudies.co.uk/pubs/summary.php?id=408 (19.10.2013).
• Rothbard, N.P. (2001). Enriching or Depleting? The Dynamics of Engagement in Work and Family Roles. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46 (4), 655–684, http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3094827.
• Russell, J.A. (2003). Core Affect and the Psychological Construction of Emotion. PsychologicalReview, 110, 145–172, http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.110.1.145.
• Salanova, M., Agut, S., Peiro´, J.M. (2005). Linking Organizational Resources and Work Engagement to Employee Performance and Customer Loyalty: The Mediation of Service Climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1217–1227, http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1217.
• Salanova, M., Llorens, S., Cifre, E., Martı´nez, I. i Schaufeli, W.B. (2003). Perceived Collective Efficacy, Subjective Well-Being and Task Performance among Electronic Work Groups: An Experimental Study. Small Group Research, 34, 43–73, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1046496402239577.
• Salanova, M. i Schaufeli, W.B. (2008). A Cross-national Study of Work Engagement as a Mediator between Job Resources and Proactive Behaviour. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19 (1), 116–131, http://dx.doi.org/37AH406.
• Sayers, R. (2007). The Right Staff from X to Y. Library Management, 28 (8/9), 474–487, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01435120710837765.
• Schaufeli, W.B. (2013). Utrech Work Engagemen Scale. Pozyskano z: http://www.wilmarschaufeli. nl/downloads/test-manuals/ (25.10.2013).
• Schaufeli, W.B. i Bakker, A.B. (2003). Test Manual for the UtrechtWork Engagement Scale. Praca niepublikowana, Utrecht University. Pozyskano z: http://www.beanmanaged.eu/pdf/articles/arnoldbakker/article_arnold_bakker_87.pdf (10.06.2013).
• Schaufeli, W.B. i Bakker, A.B. (2004). Job Demands, Job Resources, and Their Relationship with Burnout and Engagement: A Multi-sample Study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25 (3), 293–315, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/job.248.
• Schaufeli, W.B., Bakker A.B. i Salanova, M. (2006). The Measurement of Work Engagement with a Short Questionnaire. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66 (4), 701–-716.
• Schaufeli, W.B., Bakker, A.B. i Van Rhenen, W. (2009). How Changes in Job Demands and Resources Predict Burnout, Work Engagement, and Sickness Absenteeism. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30 (7), 893–917, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/job.595.
• Schaufeli, W.B., Salanova M., Gonz´alez-Rom´a, V. i Bakker A.B. (2002). The Measurement of Engagement and Burnout: A Two Sample Confirmatory Factor
• Analytic Approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, (3), 71–92, http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326.
• Schaufeli W.B., Taris, T.W. i Van Rhenen, W. (2008). Workaholism, Burnout, and Work
• Engagement: Three of a Kind or Three Different Kinds of Employee Well-being?
• Applied Psychology, 57 (2), 173–203.
• Seppälä, P., Mauno, S., Feldt, T., Hakanen, J., Kinnunen, U., Tolvanen, A. i Schaufeli, W. (2009). The Construct Validity of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale: Multisample and Longitudinal Evidence. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10 (4), 459–481, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10902-008-9100-y.
• Shimazu, A., Schaufeli, W.B., Kosugi, S., Suzuki, A., Nashiwa, H., Kato, A., Sakamoto, M., Irimajiri, H., Amano, S., Hirohata, K. i Goto, R. (2008). Work Engagement in Japan: Validation of the Japanese Version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 57 (3), 510–523, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2008.00333.x.
• Shirom, A. (2011). Vigor as a Positive Affect at Work: Conceptualizing Vigor, Its Relations with Related Constructs, and its Antecedents and Consequences. Review of General Psychology, 15, 50–64, http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0021853.
• Smola, K.W. i Sutton, C.D. (2002). Generational Differences: Revisiting Generational Work Values for the New Millennium. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 363–382.
• Sonnentag, S. (2003). Recovery, Work Engagement, and Practice Behavior: A New Look at the Interface between Nonwork and Work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 518–528.
• Storm, K. i Rothmann, S. (2003). A Psychometric Analysis of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale in The South African Police Service. Journal of Industrial Psychology, 29 (4), 62–70.
• Vallerand, R.J. (2008). On the Psychology of Passion: In Search of What Makes People’s Lives Most Worth Living. Canadian Psychology, 49, 1–13, http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0708-5591.49.1.1.
• Van Knippenberg, D. (2000). Work Motivation and Performance: A Social Identity Perspective. Applied Psychology, 49 (3), 357–371, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00020.
• Wefald, A.J., Mills, M.J., Smith, M.R. i Downey, R.G. (2012). Comparison of Three Job Engagement Measures: Examining their Factorial and Criterion Related Validity.
• Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, (4), 67–90, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-0854.2011.01059.x.

Identifiers

ISSN

1644-9584

DOI

10.7172/1644-9584.45.7