Using Information Regulation to Enhance Workplace Diversity, Inclusion, and Fairness

• Authors: Marc Bendick, Jr , Mary Lou Egan

Title variants

PL

Regulowanie przepływu informacji w zwiększaniu różnorodności, inkluzji oraz sprawiedliwości w miejscu pracy

• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

In the U.S., traditional means of promoting improved employment practices – such as public regulation, union pressure, litigation, and long-term employment relationships – have weakened, increasing the power imbalance between employers and their workers and contributing to increased economic inequality in American society. Management theory and empirical evidence suggest that “information regulation” (IR) can significantly affect employer behaviour and contribute to countering these trends. This paper explores development of a large-scale “data utility” in which objective information on the employment practices and employment outcomes of individual employers are collected, curated, made accessible on-line, and actively marketed to a range of stakeholders. The goal is to muster information to empower these stakeholders – from individual workers and their advocates to employers’ key business partners – to reward good employer behaviour and sanction bad behaviour, thereby moving employers toward “high road” practices concerning, among other things, workplace diversity, inclusion, and fairness.

PL

Tradycyjne rozumienie awansu w Stanach Zjednoczonych jako doskonalenia stosowanych praktyk w zakresie zatrudniania, wynikających z regulacji publicznych, presji związków zawodowych, sporów sądowych czy długoterminowych stosunków pracy, osłabło w ostatnim czasie, nadwyrężając siłę nierówności pomiędzy pracodawcami a ich pracownikami oraz przyczyniając się do wzrostu nierówności w amerykańskim społeczeństwie. Teorie zarządzania oraz dane empiryczne wskazują na to, że regulowanie przepływu informacji (IR) w znacznym stopniu może wpłynąć na zachowania pracowników i przyczynić się do przeciwdziałania tym trendom. Artykuł poświęcony jest rozwojowi na dużą skalę „danych użytkowych”, które zawierają rzeczywiste informacje na temat praktyk zatrudniania czy wyników indywidualnych pracowników, pozwalają na ich gromadzenie, wprowadzanie w trybie on-line oraz przesyłanie do szerokiego grona interesariuszy. Celem tych działań jest gromadzenie informacji dla uprawnionych interesariuszy – od indywidualnych pracowników i ich orędowników po kluczowych dla organizacji partnerów biznesowych – aby nagrodzić pożądane zachowania pracowników oraz sankcjonować zachowania niepożądane, a tym samym zachęcać ich do pożądanych praktyk, między innymi z zakresu różnorodności, inkluzji oraz sprawiedliwości.

Keywords

EN

information regulation; workforce diversity; workplace inclusion; employment discrimination; affirmative action

PL

regulowanie przepływu informacji; różnorodność zatrudnienia; inkluzja pracownicza; dyskryminacja pracownicza; działania afirmatywne

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie
• Journal: Argumenta Oeconomica Cracoviensia
• Year: 2014
• Issue: 10
• Pages: 59-77

Contributors

author

Marc Bendick, Jr

• Bendick and Egan Economic Consultants, Inc., 4411 Westover Pl. NW Washington, DC 20016, USA

author

Mary Lou Egan

References

• Allgov.com (2013) “Wal-Mart Supreme Court Case Cited in 1,200 Decisions in 2 Years”, www.allgov.com, date of access: 24 January 2013.
• Andriof, J. and Waddock, S. (2002) “Unfolding Stakeholder Engagement” in S. Rahman et al. (eds) Unfolding Stakeholder Thinking. Sheffield, UK: Greenleaf Publishing.
• Atkinson, A., Piketty, T., and Saez, E. (2011) “Top Incomes in the Long Run of History”. Journal of Economic Literature 49: 3–71, http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jel.49.1.3.
• Beckman, C. and Phillips, D. (2005) “Interorganizational Determinants of Promotion: Client Leadership, and the Attainment of Women Attorneys”. American Sociological Review 70: 678–701, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/000312240507000407.
• Bednar, M. (2012) “Watchdog or Lapdog? A Behavioral View of the Media as a Corporate Governance Mechanism”. Academy of Management Journal 55: 131–50, http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.0862.
• Bendick, Jr., M. (2012) “Setting Industry-level Priorities for EEOC Enforcement”. Testimony, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Hearings on the Strategic Enforcement Plan.
• Bendick., Jr., M. et al. (2008) “Enhancing Women’s Inclusion in Firefighting in the USA”. International Journal of Diversity in Communities, Organizations, and Nations 8: 189–208.
• Bendick, Jr., M. et al. (2010) “Employment Discrimination in Upscale Restaurants: Evidence from Paired Comparison Testing”. Social Science Journal 47: 802–18, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2010.04.001.
• Bendick, Jr., M., Egan, M. L. et al. (2011) The Availability of Women, Racial Minorities, and Hispanics for On-site Construction Employment. Washington: US Department of Labor.
• Bendick, Jr., M., Egan, M. L. and Lanier, L. (2010) “The Business Case for Diversity and the Perverse Practice of Matching Employees to Customers”. Personnel Review 39: 468–86, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00483481011045425.
• Best Buy Corporation (2013) “Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability Report, Fiscal Year 2013”, www.globalreporting.org, date of access: 25 February 2014.
• Blau, F. and Kahn, L. (2006) “The U.S. Gender Pay Gap in the 1990s: Slowing Convergence”. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 60: 1–22.
• Bundy, J. and Bucholz, A. (2013) “Strategic Cognitions and Issue Salience: Toward an Explanation of Firm Responsiveness to Stakeholder Concerns”. Academy of Management Review 38: 352–75.
• Cascio, W. (2006) “The High Cost of Low Wages”. Harvard Business Review, https://hbr.org/2006/12/the-high-cost-of-low-wages, date of access: 13 February 2015.
• Chetty, R. et al. (2014) Is the United States Still a Land of Opportunity? Recent Trends in Intergenerational Mobility. Boston: National Bureau of Economic Research.
• David, P., Bloom, M. and Hillman, A. (2007) “Investor Activism, Managerial Responsiveness and Corporate Social Performance”. Strategic Management Journal 28: 91–100.
• Dranove, D. and Ginger, Jr., G. (2010) “Quality Disclosure and Certification: Theory and Practice”. Journal of Economic Literature 48: 935–63.
• Eardley, E. and Mehri, C. (2013) Toward a More Perfect Union: A Progressive Blueprint for the Second Term. Washington: American Constitution Society.
• Egan, M. L., Bendick, Jr., M. et al. (2009) “France’s Mandatory ‘Triple Bottom Line’ Reporting: Promoting Sustainable Development through Informational Regulation”. International Journal of Environmental, Cultural, Economic, and Social Sustainability 7: 27–47.
• Esty, D. (2004) “Environmental Protection in the Information Age”. New York University Law Review 79: 115–211, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.429580.
• Farber, H. (2008) Job Loss and the Decline in Job Security in the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Center for Economic Policy Studies.
• Foster, J., McChesney, R. and Jonnas, R. (2014) “Monopoly and Competition in Twenty-
• -first Century Capitalism”, www.monthlyreview.org, date of access: 24 January 2014 .
• Friedman, J. (1970) “The Social Responsibility Is to Increase Profits”. The New York Times 32: 122–6.
• Fung, A., Graham, M. and Weil, D. (2007) Full Disclosure: The Perils and Promise of Transparency. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Ginsberg, W. (2011) “The Obama Administration’s Open Government Initiative: Issues for Congress”. Report 7-5700. Washington: Congressional Research Service.
• Gouldson, A. (2004) “Risk, Regulation and the Right to Know: Exploring the Impacts of Access to Information on the Governance of Environmental Risk”. Sustainable Development 12: 136–49, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sd.237.
• Granovetter, M. (1985) “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness”. American Journal of Sociology 91: 481–510, http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/ 228311.
• Gyourko, J. and Tracy, J. (2014) “Reconciling Theory and Empirics in the Role of Unemployment in Mortgage Defaults”. Journal of Urban Economics 80: 87–96, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2013.10.005.
• Hays-Thomas, R. and Bendick, Jr., M. (2013) “Professionalizing Diversity and Inclusion Practice: Should Voluntary Standards be the Chicken or the Egg?”. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice 6: 193–205, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iops.12033.
• Hillman, A., Shropshire, C. and Cannella, A. (2007) “Organizational Predictors of Women on Corporate Boards”. Academy of Management Journal 50: 941–52, http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.26279222.
• Houseman, S. (2014) “Trade, Competitiveness, and Employment in the Global Economy”. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research. Employment Research 21 (1): [1]–4, http://dx.doi.org/10.17848/1075-8445.21(1)-1.
• Iannou, I. and Serafeim, G. (2012) “The Consequences of Mandatory Corporate Sustainability Reporting”. Working Paper 11-100. Cambridge: Harvard Business School.
• Kleindorfer, P. and Orts, E. (1998) “Informational Regulation of Environmental Risks”. Risk Analysis: An International Journal 18: 155–70, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/
• j.1539-6924.1998.tb00927.x.
• Macey, W. et al. (2009). Employee Engagement. London: Blackwell.
• Mishel, L. (2013) “Declining Value of the Federal Minimum Wage is a Major Factor Driving Inequality”. Economic Policy Institute, www.epi.org, date of access: 18 February 2014.
• National Academy of Sciences (2012) Collecting Compensation Data from Employers. Washington: National Academies Press.
• NELP (2014) “Enforcement of Workplace Standards”. National Employment Law Project, http://www.nelp.org, date of access: 18 January 2014.
• Obama, B. (2013) “Remarks by the President on Economic Mobility”. Washington: White House Press Release, 4 December.
• Porter, M. and Kramer, M. (2006) “Strategy and Society: The Link between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility”. Harvard Business Review 84.
• Potoski, M. and Prakash, A. (2005) “Covenants with Weak Swords: ISO 14001 and Facilities’ Environmental Performance”. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 24: 745–69, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pam.20136.
• Renshaw, K. (2006) “Sounding Alarms: Does Informational Regulation Help or Hinder Environmentalism?”. NYU Environmental Law Journal 15: 655–95.
• Richardson, A. and Welker, W. (2001) “Social Disclosure, Financial Disclosure, and the Cost of Capital”. Accounting, Organizations and Society 26: 597–616, http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/s0361-3682(01)00025-3.
• Rodgers III, W. and Holmes, J. (2004) “New Estimates of Within-occupation African American-White Wage Gaps”. Review of Black Political Economy 31: 69–88, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12114-004-1011-5.
• Rose, C. and Bielby, W. (2011) “Race at the Top, How Companies Shape the Inclusion of African Americans on Their Boards in Response to Institutional Pressure”. Social Science Research 40: 841–59, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2010.10.007.
• Rowley, T. (1997) “Moving beyond Dyadic Ties: A Network Theory of Stakeholder Influences”. Academy of Management Review 22: 887–910, http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9711022107.
• Saez, E. (2013) Striking it Richer, The Evolution of Top Incomes in the United States. Berkeley: University of California.
• Shadowitz, D. (2006) “Going Public with EEO-1 Data”. Human Resource Executive.
• Stephan, M. (2002) “Environmental Information Disclosure Programs: They Work, but Why?”. Social Science Quarterly 83: 190–205, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/
• 1540-6237.00078.
• Stone, C. and Chen, W. (2013) Introduction to Unemployment Insurance. Washington: Center for Budget and Policy Priorities.
• Tapscott, D. and Ticoll, D. (2003) The Naked Corporation: How the Age of Transparency Will Revolutionize Business. New York: Free Press.
• Tietenberg, T. and Wheeler, D. (2001) “Empowering the Community: Information Strategies for Pollution Control” in H. Folmer et al. (eds) Frontiers of Environmental Economics. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
• US Bureau of Labor Statistics (2013) “Union Members – 2012”. News Release USDL-13-0105. Washington: US Department of Labor.
• US Bureau of Labor Statistics (2014) “Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities”, http://www.bls.goc/iff/, date of access: 24 February 2014.
• US Securities and Exchange Commission (2012) “10-K Report for Microsoft Corporation”. Commission File 0-14278, www.sec.gov/archives/edgar, date of access: 2 February 2014.
• Weil, D. (2010) Improving Workforce Conditions through Strategic Enforcement. Boston: Boston University.
• Wright, P. et al. (1995) “Competitiveness through Management of Diversity: Effects on Stock Market Valuation”. Academy of Management Journal 38: 272–84.

Identifiers

DOI

10.15678/AOC.2014.1005