Philosophical Implications of Naturalizing Religion

• Authors: Michael Polyard
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

This paper deals with Daniel Dennett’s argument regarding the nature of belief in contrast to belief in belief. The idea that the value of the first order belief in the existence of a precept is entirely irrelevant because it is indistinguishable from the second-order belief; that the belief in something is a good thing. That is to say it doesn’t matter if I believe something inasmuch as if I believe that the belief is a good thing (i.e.: beneficial to the individual, etc). Dennett’s approach particularly regards an analysis of religion from this point, and suggests that it is entirely impossible to determine if an individual believes in God, or simply believes that the belief in God is a good thing. More importantly, Dennett argues that the individual themselves cannot make this distinction.

Keywords

EN

Belif; Dennett, Daniel; naturalism; religion

• Publisher: Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
• Journal: Forum Philosophicum
• Year: 2010
• Volume: 15
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 355-365

Dates

published

2010

Contributors

author

Michael Polyard

• University of Tampa

References

• Dennett, Daniel. Breaking the Spell: Religion As a Natural Phenomenon. New York: Viking, 2006.

Identifiers

DOI

10.5840/forphil20101526

URI

http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=54527572&lang=pl&site=ehost-live

URI

http://www.pdcnet.org/pdc/bvdb.nsf/purchase?openform&fp=forphil&id=forphil_2010_0015_0002_0355_0365