The Significance of the Recovery of Hellenistic Philosophy for Modern Self–Understanding

• Authors: Schmitt Arbogast
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The Renaissance defined itself as a rebirth of Antiquity and has until today been frequently described by scholars in this way. Looking more closely at the actual transformation processes in the Renaissance, one can see that not Antiquity as such was discovered but a kind of Antiquity different to the one known to the Middle Ages. Many Humanists, among which Petrarch may be named as a prime example, have criticised the excrescences of 14th century Late Scholasticism. To justify their own new position, they referred back to the classical authors of Rome, putting aside the time in between. Primarily because of this the impression arose that the entire time which had elapsed between Antiquity and the Renaissance had been nothing but a process of decay of the arts and sciences. A closer analysis of the transformation processes that took place in the 14th century, as attempted in this paper, will show that the Renaissance should above all be understood as the result of a change of reception strategies, namely a reevaluation of Hellenistic and Roman philosophy, a shift that was connected with abandoning the Aristotelian tradition moulded by Neo–Platonism.

Keywords

Plato; Aristotle; Stoa; Neo–Platonism; renaissance of Platonism and Aristotelianism in Modernity; interpretation of Platonism and Aristotelianism; Hellenistic philosophy

• Publisher: Instytut Historii Nauki Polskiej Akademii Nauk
• Journal: Organon
• Year: 2015
• Volume: 47
• Pages: 41-63

Contributors

author

Schmitt Arbogast

• University of Marburg

References

• Aristotle, Metaphysics, (ed.) W. D. Ross, Clarendon Press, Oxford 1924.
• Büttner S., Antike Aesthetik, München 2006.
• Frede M., Stoics and Sceptics on Clear and Distinct Impressions in: M. Frede, Essays in Ancient Philosophy, Minneapolis 1987, pp. 151–176.
• Hadot I., Athenian and Alexandrian Neoplatonism and the Harmonization of Aristotle and Plato, Leiden 2015.
• Hoffmann T. S., Dimensionen des Erkennens bei Girolamo Fracastoro in: Vivarium 41, 2003, pp. 144–174.
• Hoffmann T. S., Immanentisierung der Transzendenz. Zur Stellung Georgios Gemistos Plethons in der Geschichte des Platonismus in: Philotheos 4, 2004, pp. 301–319.
• Hülser K., Die Fragmente zur Dialektik der Stoiker, vol. 1, Stuttgart 1987.
• Hume D., A Treatise of Human Nature, (ed.) L. A. Selby–Bigge, Oxford 1978.
• Karamanolis G. E., Plato and Aristotle in Agreement? Platonists on Aristotle from Antiochus to Porphyry, Oxford 2006.
• Kidd I. G., Posidonius on Emotions in: Problems in Stoicism, (ed.) A. A. Long, London 1971, pp. 200–215.
• Oehler K., Die Lehre vom noetischen und dianoetischen Denken bei Platon und Aristoteles, [2nd ed.] München 1984.
• Philoponus in: Aristotelis physicorum libros tres priores commentaria in: Commentaria in Aristotelis Graeca, vol. 16, (ed.) H. Vitelli, Berlin 1887.
• Radke G., Die Theorie der Zahl im Platonismus, Tübingen – Basel 2003.
• Schmitt A., Das Bewusste und das Unbewusste in der Deutung durch die griechische Philosophie (Platon, Aristoteles, Plotin) in: Antike und Abendland 40, 1994, pp. 59–85.
• Schmitt A., Anschauung und Denken bei Duns Scotus. Ueber eine für die neuzeitliche Erkenntnistheorie folgenreiche Akzentverlagerung in der spätmittelalterlichen Aristoteles–Deutung in: Die Renaissance und ihre Antike. Die Renaissance als erste Aufklärung, (ed.) E. Rudolph, Tübingen 1998, pp. 7–34.
• Schmitt A., Die Moderne und Platon, Stuttgart 2003.
• Schmitt A., Einheit des Mannigfaltigen: Der Widerspruchssatz als Erkenntnisprinzip in der Aufklärungsphilosophie (Kant, Wolff) und bei Aristoteles und Platon in: Pensées de l’“Un“ dans l’histoire de la philosophie. Etudes en hommage au Professeur Werner Beierwaltes, (eds.) M. Narbonne & A. Reckermann, Paris 2004, pp. 339–374.
• Schmitt A., Die Moderne und Platon, [2nd ed.] Stuttgart 2008.
• Seel M., Aesthetics of Appearing, transl. by J. Farrell, Stanford 2004.
• Thiel R., Aristoteles’ Kategorienschrift in ihrer antiken Kommentierung, Tübingen 2004.
• Thomas Aquinas, Prolog zum Kommentar der 2. Analytiken in: Thomas von Aquin. Prologe zu den Aristoteleskommentaren, (eds.) I. Cheneval & R. Imbauch, Frankfurt/Main 1993.
• Wolff Ch., Vernünftige Gedanken von Gott, der Welt und der Seele des Menschen, auch allen Dingen überhaupt [1751] in: Ch. Wolff, Gesammelte Werke, vol. 2, (ed.) Ch. A. Corr, [reprint.] Hildesheim 2004.