Metodyka badań jakościowych w małych podmiotach rodzinnych

• Authors: Sułkowski Łukasz , Marjański Andrzej

Title variants

EN

The methodology of qualitative research in small family businesses

• Languages of publication: PL

Abstracts

PL

Celem artykułu jest analiza możliwości zastosowania różnych metod badawczych w badaniach służących zrozumieniu specyfiki i problemów małych przedsiębiorstw rodzinnych. Ukazano kluczowe problemy występujące w badaniach tej grupy podmiotów. Prowadzona analiza została oparta na refleksji na temat wartości stosowanych metod poznania małych organizacji rodzinnych, porównania metod ilościowych i jakościowych oraz odniesienia się do mniej znanych metod badań, takich jak: autoetnografia, analiza porównawcza i wielokrotne studia przypadków. W artykule wskazano na konieczność stosowania pluralizmu metodologicznego, wykorzystującego stosowanie różnych metod i technik badawczych, pozwalających na opisanie złożoności małej firmy rodzinnej.

EN

This article aims to analyze the possibilities of using different research methods in studies aimed at understanding the characteristics and problems of small family businesses. It shows the key problems in research of this group of subjects. The analysis conducted was based on the reflection on the methods used with regards to cognition of small family organizations, comparison of qualitative and quantitative methods and references to less-known research methods such as auto-ethnography, comparative analysis and multiple case studies. The article pointed out the need for methodological pluralism using various methods and research techniques, which allow for a description of the complexity of a small family business.

Keywords

PL

nauki o zarządzaniu; przedsiębiorstwo rodzinne; metody badań; badania jakościowe

EN

management sciences; family business; research methods; qualitative research

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydział Nauk Ekonomicznych
• Journal: Problemy Zarządzania
• Year: 2014
• Issue: 3/2014 (47)
• Pages: 222 - 235

Dates

published

2014-08-30

Contributors

author

Sułkowski Łukasz

• Katedra Zarządzania, Wydział Zarządzania, Społeczna Akademia Nauk w Łodzi

author

Marjański Andrzej

• Zakład Przedsiębiorczości i Firm Rodzinnych, Wydział Zarządzania, Społeczna Akademia Nauk w Łodzi

References

• Adams, T.E. i Holman Jones, S. (2008). Autoethno graphy is queer. W: N.K. Denzin,
• Y.S. Lincoln i L.T. Smith (red.), Handbook of Critical and Indigenous Methodologies. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
• Armstrong, M. (1993). A Handbook of Management Techniques. London: Kogan Page.
• Babbie, E. (2003). Badania społeczne w praktyce. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
• Bartunek, J.M. i Louis, M.R. (1996). Insider/outsider team research. London: Sage.
• Borsboom, D. (2005). Measuring the Mind: Conceptual Issues in Contemporary Psychometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Bryman, A. i Bell, E. (2007). Business Research Methods. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Bullock, R.J. i Tubbs, M.E. (1990). A case meta-analysis of gainsharing programs as organization development interventions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 26 (3), 383–403. Burawoy, M. (red.) (1999). Ethnography Unbound: Power and Resistance in the Modern Metropolis. Berkeley: University of California Press.
• Cicourel, A. (1980), Language and Social Interaction: Philosophical and Empirical Issues. Sociologica Inquiry, 50, 1–30.
• Cook, T.D. i Campbell, D.T. (1979). Quasi-experimental design: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Skokie: Rand McNally.
• Crawford, L. (1996). Personal ethnography. Communication Monographs, 63 (2).
• Czakon, W. (2011). Zastosowanie studiów przypadków w badaniach nauk o zarządzaniu. W: W. Czakon (red.), Podstawy metodologii badań w naukach o zarządzaniu. Warszawa: Oficyna Wolters Kluwer.
• Czarniawska, B. (1997). Writing Management: Organisation Theory as a Literary Genre. Chicago–London: The University of Chicago Press.
• Denzin, N. (1989). Interpretive Biography. Newbury Park: Sage.
• Denzin, N. (1990). Writing the interpretive post modern ethnography. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 19 (2).
• Denzin, N. (1997). Interpretive ethnography: Ethnographic practices for the 21st century. London: Sage.
• Denzin, N. i Lincoln, Y. (red.) (2000). Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
• Denzin, N. i Lincoln, Y. (2009). Metody badań jakościowych. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
• Easterby-Smith, M., Thorpe, R. i Lowe, A. (1991). Management Research: An Introduction. London: Sage Publications.
• Eisenhardt, K.M. i Graebner, M.E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50.
• Ellis, C. (2004). The Ethnographic I: A methodological novel about autoethnography. Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press.
• Ellis, C., Adams, T.E. i Bochner, A.P. (2010). Autoethnography: An overview. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 12 (1).
• Ellis, C. i Bochner, A.P. (2000). Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity. W:
• N. Denzin i Y. Lincoln (red.), Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
• Fendt J. i Sachs, W. (2008). Grounded theory method in management research: Users’ perspectives. Organizational Research Methods, 11.
• Flanagan, J.C. (1954). The Critical Incident Technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51 (4).
• Flick, U. (2002). An Introduction to Qualitative Research. London: Sage.
• Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
• Geertz, C. (2003). Opis gęsty – w stronę interpretatywnej teorii kultury. W: Badanie kultury. Elementy teorii antropologicznej. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
• Gerring, J. (2007). Case study research: Principles and Methods. Boston: Cambridge University Press.
• Gibbert, M., Ruigrok, W. i Wicki, B. (2008). What passes as a rigorous case study? Strategic Management Journal, 29.
• Glaser, B. i Strauss, A. (1967). Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine.
• Guba, E.C. i Lincoln, Y.S. (1994). Competing Paradigms in Qualitative Research. W:
• N. Denzin i Y. Lincoln (red.), Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
• Halkier, B. (2010). Focus groups as social enactments: integrating interaction and content in the analysis of focus group data. Qualitative Research, 10 (1).
• Hayano, D.M. (1979). Auto-ethnography: Paradigms problems, and prospects. Human Organization, 38.
• Holman Jones, S. (2005). Autoethnography: Making the personal political. W: N. Denzin i Y. Lincoln (red.), Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
• Jeábek Hynek (2001). Paul Lazarsfeld – The Founder of Modern Empirical Sociology: A Research Biography. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 13, 229–244.
• Jones, S. (2003). An Exploration of the Use of Grounded Theory as a Research Approach in the Field of IS Evaluation. Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation, 6 (2).
• Konecki, K. (2000). Studia z metodologii badań jakościowych. Teoria ugruntowana. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
• Kostera, M. (2003). Antropologia organizacji. Metodologia badań terenowych. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
• Kottak, C.P. (1991). Anthropology. The Exploration of Human Diversity. New York: McGraw-Hill.
• Larsson, R. (1993). Case survey methodology: Quantitative analysis of patterns across case studies. Academy of Management Journal, 36.
• Lawson, T. (1998). Economics and Reality. London–New York: Routledge.
• Macpherson, I., Brooker, R. i Ainsworth, P. (2000). Case study in the contemporary world of research: using notions of purpose, place, process and product to develop some principles for practice. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 3 (1).
• Maylor, H. i Blackomon, K. (2005). Researching Business and Management. New York: Palgavre Macmilian.
• Mehan, H. i Wood, H. (1975). The Reality Of Ethnomethodology. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
• Michell, J. (1999). Measurement in Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Monin, N. (2004). Management Theory. A Critical and Reflective Reading. London–New York: Routledge.
• Morgan, G. (1997). Obrazy organizacji. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
• Neuman, M. (1996). Collecting ourselves at the end of the century. W: C. Ellis i A. Bochner (red.), Composing ethnography: Alternative forms of qualitative writing. London: Alta Mira Press.
• Oppenheim, A.N. (2000). Questionnaire design, interviewing and attitude measurement. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
• Reed-Danahay, D.E. (red.) (1997). Introduction. Auto/ethnography: Rewriting the self and the social. New York: Berg.
• Shaughnessy, J.J. i Zechmeister, E.B. (1990). Research Methods in Psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
• Smircich, L. (1983). Studing Organisations as Cultures. W: G. Morgan (red.), Beyond Method: Strategies for Social Research. Beverly Hills–London–New Delhi: Sage.
• Spry, T. (2001). Performing Autoethnography: An Embodied Methodological Praxis. Qualitative Inquiry, 7 (6).
• Stake, R.E. (2000). Case Studies. W: N. Denzin i Y. Lincoln (red.), Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
• Stangor, C. (2007). Research Methods for the Behavioral Sciences. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
• Stogdill, R.M. (1974). Handbook of leadership: A survey of the literature. New York: Free Press.
• Strauss, A. i Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park: Sage.
• Stringer, E.T. (1999). Action Research. Thousand Oaks–London–New Delhi: Sage.
• Sułkowski, Ł. (2012). Epistemologia i metodologia zarządzania. Warszawa: Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne.
• Sundstrom, E., McIntyre, M., Halfhill, T. i Richards, H. (2000). Work Groups: From the Hawthorne Studies to Work Teams of the 1990s and Beyond. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 4 (1).
• Touraine, A. (1978). La voix et le regard. Paris : Seulil.
• Whyte, W.F., Greenwood, D.J. i Lazes, P. (1991). Participatory Action Research: Through Practice to Science in Social Research. W: W.F Whyte (red.), Participatory Action Research. New York: Sage.
• Yin, R.K. (1994). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. London: Sage.
• Zaltman, G. i Zaltman, L. (2010). Metafora w marketingu. Jak przeniknąć umysły klientów dzięki metaforom głębokim. Poznań: Rebis.

Identifiers

ISSN

1644-9584

DOI

10.7172/1644-9584.47.12