Wykorzystanie planu badań metodami mieszanymi do tworzenia nowej wiedzy. Studium przypadku z zakresu zdrowia publicznego

• Authors: Kawalec Paweł

Title variants

EN

Use of mixed methods research design in knowledge creation. Case study on public health

• Languages of publication: PL

Abstracts

PL

Na podstawie epistemologicznej koncepcji tworzenia wiedzy naukowej proponuję nowy sposób oceny roli metod mieszanych w badaniach: przez odniesienie ich nie tylko do poziomu publikacji, lecz także do projektu badawczego. Na przykładzie wybranych publikacji z zakresu zdrowia publicznego wskazuję dwie różne role metod mieszanych w tworzeniu nowej wiedzy: rola generatywna na poziomie projektu badawczego oraz synteza dotychczasowej wiedzy na poziomie pojedynczych publikacji.

EN

Based on the epistemological concept of scientific knowledge creation, I propose a new way of assessing the role of mixed methods research design: by referring them not only to the level of publication but also to the research project. On the example of selected public health publications, I point to two different roles of mixed methods in the creation of new knowledge: a generative role at the level of a research project and the synthesis of existing knowledge at the level of publication.

Keywords

PL

metody mieszane; zdrowie publiczne; projekt badawczy

EN

mixed methods; public health; research project

• Publisher: Science Studies Committee, Polish Academy of Sciences
• Journal: Zagadnienia Naukoznawstwa
• Year: 2017
• Volume: 53
• Issue: 4(214)
• Pages: 429-452

Dates

published

2017-12

Contributors

author

Kawalec Paweł

• Wydział Filozofii, Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II

References

• Applbaum K., 2009, Is Marketing the Enemy of Pharmaceutical Innovation?, “Hastings Center Report”, 39.4: 13–17.
• Carroll L.J., Rothe J.P., 2010, Levels of Reconstruction as Complementarity in Mixed Methods Research: A Social Theory-Based Conceptual Framework for Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Research, “International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health”, 7.9: 3478–3488.
• Craig P., Dieppe P., Macintyre S., Michie S., Nazareth I., Petticrew M., 2008, Developing and Evaluating Complex Interventions: The New Medical Research Council Guidance, “BMJ”, s. a1655.
• Crandell J.L., Voils C.I., Chang Y., Sandelowski M., 2011, Bayesian data augmentation methods for the synthesis of qualitative and quantitative research findings, “Quality & quantity”, 45.3: 653–669.
• Crandell J.L., Voils C.I., Sandelowski M., 2012, Bayesian Approaches to the Synthesis of Qualitative and Quantitative Research Findings, [w:] K. Hannes, C. Lockwood (red.), Synthesizing Qualitative Research, Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, s. 137–159.
• Creswell J.W., Fetters M.D., Ivankova N.V., 2004, Designing a Mixed Methods Study in Primary Care, “Annals of Family Medicine”, 2.1: 7–12.
• Creswell J.W., Zhang W., 2009, The Application of Mixed Methods Designs to Trauma Research, “Journal of Traumatic Stress”, 22: 612–621.
• Desborough J., Phillips C., Mills J., Korda R., Bagheri N., Banfield M., 2017, Developing a Positive Patient Experience with Nurses in General Practice: An Integrated Model of Patient Satisfaction and Enablement, “Journal of Advanced Nursing”, DOI: 10.1111/jan.13461.
• Fetters M.D., Curry L.A., Creswell J.W., 2013, Achieving Integration in Mixed Methods Designs-Principles and Practices, “Health Services Research”, 48.6/2: 2134–2156.
• Green C.A., Duan N., Gibbons R.D., Hoagwood K.E., Palinkas L.A., Wisdom J.P., 2015, Approaches to Mixed Methods Dissemination and Implementation Research: Methods, Strengths, Caveats, and Opportunities, “Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research”, 42.5: 508–523.
• Guetterman T.C., Fetters M.D., Creswell J.W., 2015, Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Results in Health Science Mixed Methods Research Through Joint Displays, “The Annals of Family Medicine”, 13.6: 554–561.
• Højen A.A., Sørensen E.E., Dreyer P.S., Søgaard M., Larsen T.B., 2017, Long-Term Mental Well-Being of Adolescents and Young Adults Diagnosed with Venous Thromboembolism: Results from a Multistage Mixed Methods Study, “Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis”, DOI: 10.1111/jth.13873.
• Hsieh H.-F., Shannon S.E., 2005, Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis, “Qualitative Health Research”, 15.9: 1277–1288.
• Humphreys M., Jacobs A., 2014, Mixing Methods: A Bayesian Integration of Qualitative and Quantitative Inferences, manuskrypt.
• Kawalec P., 2014, Metody mieszane w kontekście procesu badawczego w naukoznawstwie, „Zagadnienia Naukoznawstwa”, 50.1: 3–22.
• Kawalec P., 2015, Charakterystyka procesu decyzyjnego w dyfuzji innowacji jako przedmiotu badań metodami mieszanymi, Veritas in caritate, Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL, s. 213–221.
• Kawalec P., 2017a, Towards an evolutionary model of science dynamics: generation and production of scientifi c knowledge, „Zagadnienia Naukoznawstwa”, 53.4, w druku.
• Kawalec P., 2017b, Perspectival representation in DSGE models, “Economics and Business Review”, 3.3: 80–99.
• Kawalec P., 2017c, Ewaluacja – teoria i metodologia, Ewaluacja polityki naukowej i innowacyjnej, Warszawa: PAN, s. 81, w druku.
• Latour B., Woolgar S., 1986, Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• Leviton L.C., 2017, Generalizing about Public Health Interventions: A Mixed-Methods Approach to External Validity, “Annual Review of Public Health”, 38.1: 371–391.
• Marjanovic S., Cochrane G., Robin E., Sewankambo N., Ezeh A., Nyirenda M., … Chataway J., 2017, Evaluating a Complex Research Capacity-Building Intervention: Reflections on an Evaluation of the African Institutions Initiative, “Evaluation”, 23.1: 80–101.
• Mirowski P., 2011, Science-mart: privatizing American science, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
• Moffatt S., White M., Mackintosh J., Howel D., 2006, Using Quantitative and Qualitative Data in Health Services Research – What Happens When Mixed Method Findings Conflict? [ISRCTN61522618], “BMC Health Services Research”, 6.1.
• Moore G.F., Audrey S., Barker M., Bond L., Bonell C., Hardeman W., … Baird J., 2015, Process Evaluation of Complex Interventions: Medical Research Council Guidance, “BMJ”, 350.mar196: h1258–h1258.
• O’Cathain A., Murphy E., Nicholl J., 2007, Why, and How, Mixed Methods Research Is Undertaken in Health Services Research in England: A Mixed Methods Study, “BMC Health Services Research”, 7.1.
• O’Cathain A., Murphy E., Nicholl J., 2008, The Quality of Mixed Methods Studies in Health Services Research, “Journal of Health Services Research & Policy”, 13.2: 92–98.
• O’Cathain A., Thomas K.J., Drabble S.J., Rudolph A., Goode J., Hewison J., 2014, Maximising the Value of Combining Qualitative Research and Randomised Controlled Trials in Health Research: The QUAlitative Research in Trials (QUART) Study – a Mixed Methods Study, “Health Technology Assessment”, 18.38.
• Palinkas L.A., Aarons G.A., Horwitz S., Chamberlain P., Hurlburt M., Landsverk J., 2011, Mixed Method Designs in Implementation Research, “Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research”, 38.1: 44–53.
• Palinkas L.A., Horwitz S.M., Chamberlain P., Hurlburt M.S., Landsverk J., 2011, Mixed-Methods Designs in Mental Health Services Research: A Review, “Psychiatric Services”, 62.3: 255–263.
• Pearson A., White H., Bath-Hextall F., Salmond S., Apostolo J., Kirkpatrick P., 2015, A Mixed-Methods Approach to Systematic Reviews:, “International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare”, 13.3: 121–131.
• Pelto P.J., 2015, What Is So New About Mixed Methods?, “Qualitative Health Research”, 25.6: 734–745.
• Pope C., Ziebland S., Mays N., 2000, Analysing qualitative data, “BMJ: British Medical Journal”, 320.7227: 114–116.
• Rapport F., Storey M., Porter A., Snooks H., Jones K., Peconi J., … Russell I., 2013, Qualitative Research within Trials: Developing a Standard Operating Procedure for a Clinical Trials Unit, “Trials”, 14.1: 54.
• Ridde V., Olivier de Sardan J.-P., 2015, A Mixed Methods Contribution to the Study of Health Public Policies: Complementarities and Difficulties, “BMC Health Services Research”, 15.S3.
• Schoonenboom J., Johnson R.B., 2017, How to Construct a Mixed Methods Research Design, “KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie”, 69.S2: 107–131.
• Small H., Boyack K.W., Klavans R., 2014, Identifying Emerging Topics in Science and Technology, “Research Policy”, 43.8: 1450–1467.
• Snowdon C., 2015, Qualitative and Mixed Methods Research in Trials, “Trials”, 16.1.
• Stange K.C., 2006, Publishing Multimethod Research, “The Annals of Family Medicine”, 4.4: 292–294.
• Tariq S., Woodman J., 2013, Using Mixed Methods in Health Research, “JRSM Short Reports”, 4.6: 2042533313479197.
• Tong A., Sainsbury P., Craig J., 2007, Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ): A 32-Item Checklist for Interviews and Focus Groups, “International Journal for Quality in Health Care”, 19.6: 349–357.
• van Fraassen B.C., 2009, The Perils of Perrin, in the Hands of Philosophers, “Philosophical Studies”, 143.1: 5–24.
• Weiner B.J., Amick H.R., Lund J.L., Lee S.-Y.D., Hoff T.J., 2011, Review: Use of Qualitative Methods in Published Health Services and Management Research: A 10-Year Review, “Medical Care Research and Review”, 68.1: 3–33.
• Zhang W., Creswell J., 2013, The Use of “Mixing” Procedure of Mixed Methods in Health Services Research, “Medical Care”, 51.8: e51–e57.