The Neo-Weberian State paradigm in the water and sewage sector in Poland

• Authors: Głuc Krzysztof
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Objectives: The main objective of this article is to investigate the current stage of the public management paradigm in the area of the water and sewage sector in Poland. Research Design & Methods: A thorough examination of the current stage of research of the post-New Public Management concepts is followed by empirical analysis of public management paradigms present in the water and sewage sector in Poland. The research hypothesis focuses on a shift from the NPM model towards other paradigms closer to Neo-Weberian State or a hybrid. Analysis of statistical data is supported by additional arguments related to recent publications and legal changes in the sector. Contribution/Value Added: This article is one of the first analyses of the applications of post-NPM paradigms in the water and sewage sector in Poland. A special emphasis is put on the discussion of NWS elements in the paradigm shift taking place in this sector. Implications/Recommendations: The results of the research conducted prove that the NPM model is still in place in the water and sewage sector in Poland, but gradually, in particular as a result of recent changes to legislation and the introduction of more centralised procedures, the NPM model is being supplemented by new elements that are clearly of a NWS origin. While it is visible that these paradigms co-exist at this point, it is necessary to continue research and thorough observations of the sector to investigate the future development of public management in this area.

Keywords

EN

New Public Management; Neo-Weberian State; Public Governance; post-NPM paradigms; water and sewage sector

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Krakowie, Małopolska Szkoła Administracji Publicznej
• Journal: Zarządzanie Publiczne / Public Governance
• Year: 2018
• Issue: 4(46)
• Pages: 50-64

Contributors

author

Głuc Krzysztof

• Faculty of Public Economy and Administration Cracow University of Economics

References

• Białynicki-Birula, P., Ćwiklicki, M., Głowacki, J. & Klich, J. (2016). The conceptualisation of the Neo-Weberian state in the literature. In: S. Mazur (Ed.), The Neo-Weberian State. Towards a New Paradigm of Public Management? Warsaw: Scholar Publishing House.
• Bourgon, J. (2007). Responsive, responsible and respected government: Towards a New Public Administration theory. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 73(1), 7–26.
• Bourgon, J. (2011). A New Synthesis of Public Administration: Serving in the 21st Century. Montreal and Kingston: McGill- Queen’s University Press.
• Central Statistical Office. (2018a). Statistical Yearbook of the Republic of Poland 2017. Warsaw: Główny Urząd Statystyczny.
• Central Statistical Office. (2018b). Structural Changes of Groups of Entities in the National Economy in the REGON Register, 2017. Warsaw: Główny Urząd Statystyczny.
• Christensen, T. & Laegreid, P. (2011). Complexity and hybrid public administration – theoretical and empirical challenges. Public Organization Review, 11(4), 407–423. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/225361657_Complexity_and_Hybrid_Public_Administration_Theoretical_and_Empirical_Challenges (last accessed: 5 January 2019).
• Chudziński, P. (Ed.) (2018a). Zarządzanie przedsiębiorstwem wodociągowym. Uwarunkowania funkcjonowania i współczesne koncepcje zarządzania. Warszawa: Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne.
• Chudziński, P. (Ed.) (2018b). Zarządzanie przedsiębiorstwem wodociągowym. Społeczne aspekty funkcjonowania i pomiar efektywności. Warszawa: Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne.
• Denhardt, J. V. & Denhardt, R. B. (2011). The New Public Service: Serving, Not Steering. 3rd Edition. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
• Drechsler, W. (2005a). The rise and demise of the New Public Management. Post-autistics Economic Review, 33, 17–28. Retrieved from http://www.paecon.net/PAEReview/issue33/Drechsler33.htm (last accessed 28 December 2018).
• Drechsler, W. (2005b). The re-emergence of ‘Weberian’ public administration after the fall of New Public Management: The Central and Eastern European perspective. Halduskultuur – Administrative Culture, 6, 94–108.
• Drechsler, W. & Kattel, R. (2008). Towards the Neo-Weberian state? Perhaps, but certainly adieu, NPM! NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 1(2), 95–99.
• Dunn, W. & Miller, D. (2007). A critique of the New Public Management and the Neo-Weberian state: Advancing a critical theory of administrative reform. Public Organization Review, 7(4), 345–358.
• Emery, Y. & Giauque, D. (2014). The hybrid universe of public administration in the 21st century. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 80(1), 23–32.
• Kostakis, V. (2011). Commons-Based Peer Production and the Neo-Weberian State” Synergies and Interdependencies. Halduskultuur – Administrative Culture, 12(2), 146–161.
• Levitas, A. (2018). Local government reform as state building: What the Polish case says about “decentralisation”. Zarządzanie Publiczne – Public Governance, 3(45), 5–25.
• Lynn, L. (2008). What is a Neo-Weberian state? Reflections on a concept and its implications. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 1(2), 17–30.
• Najwyższa Izba Kontroli. (2016). Kształtowanie cen usług za dostarczanie wody i odprowadzanie ścieków. Warszawa: Najwyższa Izba Kontroli.
• Mazur, S. (ed.) (2016). The Neo-Weberian State: Towards a New Paradigm of Public Management? Warsaw: Scholar Publishing House.
• Osborne, S. P. (2006). The New Public Governance? Public Management Review, 8(3), 377–388. Retrieved from http://spp.xmu.edu.cn/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/the-New-Public-Governance.pdf (last accessed 29 December 2018).
• Osborne, S. P. (2010). The New Public Governance. London: Routledge.
• Peters, B.G. (2001). The Future of Governing, 2nd rev. edn, Kansas UP: Lawrence.
• Pollitt, Ch. (2008). An overview of the papers and propositions of the first Trans-European Dialogue (TEDI). NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 1(2), 9–16.
• Pollitt, Ch. & Bouckaert, G. (2004). Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis. 2nd edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Pollitt, Ch. & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis. 3rd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Randma-Liiv, T. (2008). New Public Management versus the Neo-Weberian State in Central and Eastern Europe. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 1(2), 69–81.
• Robinson, M. (2015). From Old Public Administration to the New Public Service Implications for Public Sector Reform in Developing Countries. Singapore: UNDP Global Centre for Public Service Excellence.
• Sejm. (1990). Ustawa o samorządzie gminnym. Dz. U.1990 Nr 16 poz. 95.
• Sejm. (2018a). Prawo wodne. Dz. U. 2018 poz. 2268.
• Sejm. (2018b). Ustawa o zbiorowym zaopatrzeniu w wodę i zbiorowym odprowadzaniu ścieków. Dz. U. 2018 poz. 650.
• Weber, E. P. & Khademian, A. M. (2008). Wicked problems, knowledge challenges, and collaborative capacity builders in network settings. Public Administration Review, 68(2), 334–349.

Identifiers

DOI

https://doi.org/10.15678/ZP.2018.46.4.04