Discursive Power: On Canon, Language, and Music as Dispositif

• Authors: Ris Valentin
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

This essay aims to interconnect the aspects of canon, cultural musicology, music and language with the systematic category of dispositif. In a short overview on the disciplinary canon debate, the essay describes the idea of a musical canon and questions its methodological status in musicology. The conclusion is that (aesthetic) value judgements are to be rejected as scientific (consequently rational or intersubjectively reasonable) selection criteria. The second argument draws on Lawrence Kramer’s notion of “constructive description”, which addresses the relation of music and language and helps in understanding the canon as a specific historical agency of different overlapping discourses. In order to outline an integrative ontology for the epistemological interest of cultural musicology, the last section synthesises these arguments in the Foucauldian idea of dispositif.

Keywords

EN

cultural musicology; methodology; dispositif; ontology; canon

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Jagielloński. Koło Naukowe Studentów Muzykologii UJ
• Journal: Kwartalnik Młodych Muzykologów UJ
• Year: 2019
• Issue: 2(41)
• Pages: 5-22

Dates

online

2019-07-31

Contributors

author

Ris Valentin

• University of Cologne

References

• Adler G., Umfang, Methode und Ziel der Musikwissenschaft, “Vierteljahrsschrift für Musikwissenschaft” 1885, No. 1.
• Appen R. von, Doehring A., Nevermind The Beatles, here’s Exile 61 and Nico: “The top 100 records of all time”– A Canon of Pop and Rock Albums from a Sociological and an Aesthetic Perspective, “Popular Music” 2006, No. 25/1.
• Applegate C., How German Is It? Nationalism and the Idea of Serious Music in the Early Nineteenth Century, “19th-Century Music” 1998, No. 21/3.
• Bloom H., The Western Canon: The Books and School of Ages, New York—San Diego—London 1994.
• Bohlman P.V., Epilogue: Musics and Canons, [in:] Disciplining Music: Musicology and its Canon, K. Bergeron, idem (eds.), Chicago— London 1992.
• Bohlman P.V., Ontologies of Music, [in:] Rethinking Music, N. Cook, M. Everist (eds.), Oxford 2001.
• Born G., For a Relational Musicology: Music and Interdisciplinarity, Beyond the Practice Turn, “Journal of the Royal Musical Association” 2010, No. 135/2.
• Born G., On Musical Mediation: Ontology, Technology and Creativity, “Twentieth-Century Music” 2005, No. 2/1.
• Bourdieu P., Distinction. A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste, trans. by R. Nice, MA thesis, Cambridge University, 1984.
• Cavallaro M., Der Beitrag der Phänomenologie Edmund Husserls zur Debatte über die Fundierung der Geisteswissenschaften, “Phänomenologische Forschungen” 2013.
• Citron, M.J., Gender and the Musical Canon, Cambridge 1993.
• Cook N., We are All (Ethno)musicologists Now, [in:] The New (Ethno) musicologies, H. Stobart (ed.), Lanham 2008.
• Dahlhaus C., (ed.) Das Problem Mendelssohn, Regensburg 1974.
• Dahlhaus C., Foundations of Music History, trans. into English by J.B. Robinson, Cambridge 1983.
• Deleuze G., What is a dispositif, [in:] Two Regimes of Madness. Texts and Interviews 1975–1995, D. Lapoujade (ed.), trans. into English by A. Hodges, M. Taormina, New York 2006.
• Derrida J., Signature Event Context, [in:] Margins of Philosophy, trans. into English by A. Bass, Chicago 1982.
• DiChiera D., Johnson Robinson J., Antonio Sacchini, [in:] Grove Music Online, https://www.oxfordmusiconline.com/grovemusic/view/10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.001.0001/omo-9781561592630-e-0000024251 [accessed 18.03.2019].
• Everist M., Reception Theories, Canonic Discourse, and Musical Value, [in:] Rethinking Music, N. Cook, idem (ed.), Oxford 2001.
• Foucault M., Discipline and Punish. The Birth of the Prison, trans. into English by A. Sheridan, New York 1978.
• Foucault M., The Confession of the Flesh, [in:] Power/Knowledge. Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977, C. Gordon (ed.), New York 1980.
• Foucault M., The Order of Things. An Archaeology of the Human Sciences, London—New York 2000.
• Goehr L., The Imaginary Museum of Musical Works. An Essay in the Philosophy of Music, Oxford 1994.
• Gerhard A., „Kanon“ in der Musikgeschichtsschreibung, Nationalistische Gewohnheiten nach dem Ende der nationalistischen Epoche, “Archiv für Musikwissenschaft” 2000, No. 57/1.
• Hentschel F., Ein musikhistoriographischer Sonderweg? Probleme mit Dahlhaus’ Geschichtstheorie, [in:] Carl Dahlhaus’ Grundlagen der Musikgeschichte. Eine Re-Lektüre, F. Geiger, T. Janz (eds.), Paderborn 2016.
• Hentschel F., Über Wertung, Kanon und Musikwissenschaft, [in:] Der Kanon der Musik. Theorie und Geschichte, K. Pietschmann, M. Wald-Fuhrmann (eds.), Munich 2013.
• Hepokoski J., Dahlhaus’s Beethoven-Rossini Stildualismus: Lingering Legacies of the Text-Event Dichotomy, [in:] The Invention of Beethoven and Rossini. Historiography, Analysis, Criticism, N. Mathew, B. Walton (eds.), Cambridge 2013.
• Hepokoski J., The Dahlhaus Project and Its Extra-Musicological Sources, “19th-Century Music” 1991, No. 14/3.
• Jackson M.W., Harmonious Triads. Physicists, Musicians, and Instrument Makers in Nineteenth-Century Germany, MA thesis, Cambridge University, 2008.
• Kerman J., A Few Canonic Variations, “Critical Inquiry” 1983, No. 10/1.
• Kittler F., Discourse Networks, 1800/1900, trans. into English by M. Metteer, C. Cullens, Stansford 1990.
• Kramer L., Classical Music and Postmodern Knowledge, Berkeley— Los Angeles 1995.
• Kramer L., Subjectivity Pampant! Music, Hermeneutics, and History, [in:] The Cultural Study of Music. A Critical Introduction, M. Clayton, T. Herbert, R. Middleton (eds.), New York—London 2003.
• Kuhn T.S., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago—London 1962.
• Landgreben L., Regions of Being and Regions of Ontology in Husserl’s Phenomenology (1956), [in:] Apriori and World: European Contributions to Husserlian Phenomenology, W. Mckenna, R.M. Harlan, L.E. Winters (eds.), The Hague—Boston—London 1981.
• Mauss M., Body Techniques, [in:] Sociology and Psychology: Essays, trans. into English by B. Brewester, Boston 1979.
• Morgan R.P., Rethinking Musical Culture: Canonic Reformulations in a Post-Tonal Age, [in:] Disciplining Music: Musicology and its Canon, K. Bergeron, P.V. Bohlman (eds.), Chicago—London 1992.
• Randel D.M., The Canons in the Musicological Toolbox, [in:] Disciplining Music: Musicology and its Canon, K. Bergeron, P.V. Bohlman (eds.), Chicago—London 1992.
• Riethmüller A., Das „Problem Mendelssohn“, “Archiv für Musikgeschichte” 2002, No. 59/3.
• Scherer W., Klavier-Spiele. Die Psychotechnik der Klaviere im 18. und 19. Jahrhundert, Munich 1989.
• Schlüter B., Murmurs of Earth. Musik- und medienästhetische Strategien um 1800 und ihre Postfigurationen in der Gegenwartskultur, Stuttgart 2007.
• Seeger C., On the Moods of Music Logic, “Journal of the American Musicological Society” 1960, No. 13.
• Sterne J., The Audible Past. Cultural Origins of Sound Reproduction, Durham—London 2003.
• Szendy P., Listen: A History of Our Ears, trans. into English by C. Mandell, New York 2008.
• Weber W., The History of Musical Canon, [in:] Rethinking Music, N. Cook, M. Everist (eds.), Oxford 2001.