Dawid i Goliat, czyli spór o to, jaki obraz Dawida prezentuje 1Sm 17,1-18,5?

• Authors: Lemański Janusz

Title variants

IT

Davide e Golia cioè la controversia riguardo la quale immagine di Davide presenta 1 Sam 17,1-18,5?

• Languages of publication: EN PL

Abstracts

IT

La pericope di 1 Sm 17, 1-18, 5 viene considerata come una parte estranea nel contesto. Inoltre si presenta come una compilazione almeno di due racconti alternativi. L'analisi narrativa permette però di vedere alcune difficoltà letterarie sottolineate dagli esegeti in maniera diversa. Non solo come un segno di una compilazione e redazione posteriore, ma anche come un voluto mezzo leterrario il quale fa prosequire gli eventi e capire meglio il loro significato posteriore. Davide di solito viene visto in questa pericope come un giovanotto mancato di esperienza militare e la sua vittoria diventa solamente un segno di provvidenza divina. Di nuovo l'analisi esegetica ci permette di seguire la proposta di Campbell e vedere Davide come un giovanne guerriero ma con una buona esperienza militare, furbo nel fare un duello con il più potente avversario. La sua fede corrisponde alla reale protezione e provvidenza divina riguardo alla sua persona. Serve però non tanto per spogliare Davide dal qualsiasi merito nella vittoria, ma piuttosto per indicare che Dio di Israele veramente protegge il popolo di Israele e Davide e il suo eletto per continuare questa protezione nel futuro.

Keywords

PL

Dawid; Goliat; Saul; Jonatan; opatrzność; walka

IT

Davide; Goliat; Saul; Jonatan; provvidenza; combattimento

• Publisher: Faculty of Theology at the John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin / Wydawnictwo KUL, ul. Zbożowa 61, 20-827 Lublin, Poland
• Journal: Roczniki Biblijne
• Year: 2010
• Volume: 2(57)
• Pages: 77-121

Dates

published

2010-10-10

Contributors

author

Lemański Janusz

• Faculty of Theology, Szczecin University, ul. Papieża Pawła VI 2, 71-459 Szczecin

References

• P.R. Ackroyd, The Verb Love – ’āhēb in the David-Jonathan Narratives – A Footnote, VT 25 (1975);
• Y. Aharoni, The Land of the Bible. A Historical Geography, Philadelphia 1979;
• A.G. Auld, C.Y.S. Ho, The Making of David and Goliath, JSOT 56 (1992);
• Barthélemy D. i inni, The Story of David and Goliath. Textual and Literary Criticism (OBO 73), Göttingen 1986;
• Beck J.A., David and Goliath, a Story of Place: The Narrative-Geographicaly Shaping of 1 Samuel 17, WThJ 68 (2006) 321-330;
• Ben-Efrat Sh., Das Erste Buch Samuel. Ein narratologisch-philologischer Kommentar (BWANT 176), Stuttgart 2007;
• J.P. Brown, Peace Symbolism in Ancient Military Vocabulary, VT 21 (1971);
• W. Brueggemann, I e II Samuel, Torino 2005;
• Campbell A.F., 1 Samuel (The Forms of the Old Testament Literature VII), Grand Rapids – Cambridge 2003;
• A.F. Campbell , M.A. O’Brien, Unfolding the Deuteronomistic History. Orygins, Upgrades, Present Text, Minneapolis 2000;
• A. Caquot, Ph de Robert, Les livres de Samuel, Genève 1994;
• A.R. Ceresko, A Rhetorical Analysis of David’s ‘Boast’ (1 Samuel 17,34-37): Some Reflections on Method, CBQ 47 (1985);
• S.J. De Vreies, David’s Victory Over the Philistine as Saga and as Legend, JBL 92 (1973)
• A. Deem, „…And the Stone sank into His Forehead”. A Note On 1 Samuel XVII,49, VT 28 (1978);
• Dietrich W., Die Erzählung von David und Goliat in 1 Sam 17, ZAW 108 (1996) 172-191;
• Dietrich W., Naumann Th., Die Samuelbücher (EdF 287), Darmstadt 1995;
• F.W. Dobbs-Allsopp, Ingressive qwm in Biblical Hebrew, ZAH 8 (1995);
• F.C. Fensham, The Battle Between the Men of Joab and Abner as a Possible Order by Battle?, VT 20 (1970);
• J.N. Ford, The ‘Living Rephaim’ of Ugarit: Quick or Defunct?, UF 24 (1992);
• Fouts D.M., Who Really Killed Goliath? 2 Sam 21,19 versus 1 Chronicles 20,5, Journal of Translation and Textlinguistics 13 (2000) 14-24;
• Galling K., Goliath und seine Rüstung, w: Volume du Congrès: Genève 1965 (VT.S 15), Leiden 1966, 150-169;
• S. Gerlemann, Die sperrende Grenze: Die Wurzel ‘lm im Hebräischen, ZAW 91 (1979) 338-349;
• M. Gottlieb, Die Tradition von David als Hirte, VT 17 (1967);
• K. Gros Louis, The Difficulty of Ruling Well: King David of Israel, Semeia 8 (1977);
• B. Halpern, David’s Secret Demons. Messiah, Murder, Traitor, King, Grand Rapids – Cambridge 2001;
• H.W. Herzberg, Die Samuelbücher (ATD 10), Göttingen 71987;
• H.A. Hoffner, A Hittite Analogue to the David and Goliath Contest of Champions?, CBQ 30 (1968);
• T. Ishida, The Royal Dynasties In Ancient Israel. A Study on the Formation and Development of Royal-Dynastic Ideology (BZAW 142), Berlin 1977;
• H. Jason, The Story of David and Goliath: A Folkepic?, Biblica 60 (1979);
• G.H. Jones, „Holy War” or „Jahwe War”?, VT 25 (1975);
• O. Kaiser, David und Jonathan. Tradition, Redaktion und Geschichte in 1 Sam 16-20. Ein Versuch, EThL 66 (1990);
• D. Kellermann Die Geschichte von David und Goliat im Lichte der Endokrynologie, ZAW 102 (1990);
• K.A. Kitchen, The Philistines, w: Peoples of the Old Testament Times, red. D.J. Wiseman, Oxford 1973;
• Klein R.W., 1 Samuel (WBC 10), Waco 1983;
• Klein J., Unbeabsichtige Bedeuetungen in den Daviderzählungen. Am Beispiel von 1 Sam 17,55-58, w: W. Dietrich (red.), David und Saul im Wiederstreit – Diachronie und Synchronie im Wettstreit. Beiträge zur Auslegung des ersten Samuelbuches, Fribourg – Göttingen 2004, 129-137;
• G.N. Knoppers (1 Chronicles 10-29 (AB 12A), New York 2004;
• L. Koehler, W. Baumgartner, J.J. Stamm, Wielki słownik hebrajsko-polski i aramejsko-polski Starego Testamentu, Warszawa, t. II;
• A. van der Kooij, The Story of David and Goliath: The Early History of Its Text, ETL 68 (1992);
• L. Krinetzki, Ein Beitrag zur Stilanalyse der Goliathperikope (1 Sam 17,1-18,5), Biblica 54 (1973);
• T. Li, Goliath, w: Dictionary of the Old Testament. Historical Books, red. B.T. Arnold, H.G.M. Williamson, Dovner Grove – Leicester 2005;
• McCarter P.K., 1 Samuel, (AB 8), New York 1980;
• P.D. Miscal, 1 Samuel. A Literary Reading, Bloomington 1986;
• G. Molin, What is a Kidon?, JSS 1 (1956);
• W.L. Moran, The Ancient Near Eastern Background of the Love of God in Deuteronomy, CBQ 25 (1963);
• R. North, David’s Rise. Sacral, Military or Psychiatric?, Biblica 63 (1982);
• L.M. von Pákozdy, Elhanan –der frühere Name Davids?, BZAW 68 (1956);
• S. Pisano, Additions or Omissions in the Book of Samuel: The Significant Pluses and Minuses in the Massoretic, LXX and Qumran Text (OBO 57), Freiburg 1984;
• J. Renz; W. Röllig, Handbuch der althebräischen Epigraphik, t. I, Darmstadt 1995;
• G. Rinaldi, Golia e David (1 Sam 17,1-18,8), BeO 8 (1966);
• A. Rofé, The Batle of David and Goliath. Folklore, Theology, Eschatology, w: J. Neusner i inni (red.), Judaic Perspectives on Ancient Israel, Philadelphia 1987;
• Stähli H.P., Knabe-Jüngling-Knecht: Untersuchungen zum Begriff n`r im Alten Testament (BET 7), Frankfurt am Main 1978;
• Stoebe H.J., Das erste Buch Samuelis (KAT VIII/1), Güterloh 1973;
• H.J. Stoebe, Die Goliathperikope 1 Sam XVII 1- XVIII 5 und die Textform der Septuaginta, VT 6 (1956);
• F. Stolz, Das erte und zweite Buch Samuel (ZBK.AT9), Zürich 1981;
• B. Szczepanowicz, A.Mrozek (red.), Atlas zwierząt biblijnych. Miejsce w Biblii i symbolika, Kraków 2007;
• J.A. Thompson, The Significance of the Verb Love in the David-Jonathan in I Samuel, VT 24 (1974);
• J.H. Tigay, Empirical Models for Biblical Criticism, Philadelphia 1985;
• Trebolle J., The Story of David and Goliath (1 Sam 17-18): Textual Variants and Literary Composition, Bulletin of International Organization for Septuagint and Cognate Studies 23 (1990) 16-30;
• Tsumura D.T., The First Book of Samuel (NICOT), Grand Rapids – Cambridge 2007;
• W.G.E. Watson, Ugaritic Onomastics (2), AnOr 8 (1990);
• H.G.M. Williamson, Dovner Grove – Leicester 2005;
• J.T. Willis, The Function of Comprehensive Anticipatory Redactional Joint In 1 Samuel 16-18, ZAW 85 (1973);
• Yadin A., Goliath’s Armour an Israelite Collective Memory, VT 54 (2004) 373-395.
• R.F. Youngblood, Giants, heroes, mighty men, w: NIDOTTE, t. IV