History of a Polyglossic Literary Culture. On the Decline of the History of Hindi Literature

• Authors: Borek Piotr
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

One of many Western categories which prove to be unsuitable to South Asian evidence is the history of literature (meant as the history of a single language). With reference to the Hindi literary traditions, the logic of this concept created huge gaps. One of those (16th to 18th century) has been filled with the history of literatures written in genetically close but different languages. The problem is being solved by the most recent scholarship with the new concept of literary cultures which should replace the old category of the histories of one-language literatures. The extension and adaptation of the sociolinguistic concept of diglossia may provide a theoretical justification and a tool for such reform to be definitively undertaken and accepted by the scholars. This preliminary suggestion is offered after a selective sketch of the problems imposed by the linguistic variety in the area discussed.

Keywords

EN

rīti; bhāsā; Braj; Hindi; literary culture; sociolinguistics; diglossia; polyglossia; nationalism

• Publisher: Księgarnia Akademicka
• Journal: Cracow Indological Studies
• Year: 2013
• Volume: 15: Text History and Society as Depicted in Indian Literature and Art. Part II. ŚRAVYA. Poetry & Prose
• Pages: 249-264

Contributors

author

Borek Piotr

• Jagiellonian University, Kraków

References

• Busch, A. 2011. Poetry of Kings. The Classical Hindi Literature of Mughal India. Oxford–New York: Oxford University Press.
• Dalmia, V. 1997. The Nationalization of Hindu Traditions. Bhāratendu Hariśchandra and Nineteenth-century Banaras. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
• Ferguson, Ch. A. 1966. Diglossia, Language, Culture and Society. In: D. H. Hymes (ed.). Language in culture and society: A Reader in Linguistics and Anthropology. New York: Harper & Row: 429–439.
• Fishman, J. A. 1970. Sociolinguistics. A Brief Introduction. Rowley: Newbury House Publishers.
• Goody, J. 2006. The Theft of History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Grierson, G. A. 1889. The Modern Vernacular Literature of Hindustan. Calcutta: The Asiatic Society.
• Kieniewicz, J. 2003. Wprowadzenie do historii cywilizacji Wschodu i Zachodu. Warszawa: Dialog.
• Lutgendorf, P. 1991. The Life of a Text. Performing the Ramcaritmanas of Tulsidas. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.
• Mallison, F. 2011. The Teaching of Braj, Gujarati, and Bardic Poetry at the Court of Kutch: The Bhuj Brajbhasa Pathśala. In: Sh. Pollock (ed.). Forms of Knowledge in Early Modern Asia. Durham & London: Duke University Press.
• McGregor, R. S. 2007. The Progress of Hindi. Part I: The Development of a Transregional Idiom. In: Sh. Pollock (ed.). Literary Cultures in History.
• Reconstructions from South Asia: 912-957. Berkeley–Los Angeles–London: University of California Press.
• Pollock, Sh. 2003. Introduction. In: Sh. Pollock (ed.). Literary Cultures in History. Reconstructions from South Asia. Berkeley–Los Angeles–London: University of California Press.
• Pollock, Sh. 2006. The Language of Gods in the World of Men: Sanskrit, Culture and Power in the Premodern India. Berkeley: University of California Press.
• Schiffman, H. F. 1997. Diglossia as a Sociolinguistic Situation. In: F. Coulmas (ed.). The Handbook of Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers: 205–216.
• Stasik, D. 2000. Opowieść o prawym królu. Tradycja Ramajany w literaturze Hindi. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Akademickie Dialog.
• Śaraṇ, Ś. 1996. Hindī Sāhitya kā Itihās. Prathama Khaṇḍa. Dillī: Prem Prakāśan Mandir.
• Śukla, R. 2002 (1st published 1929). Hindī Sāhitya kā itihās. Kānpur: Candraloka Prakāśana.
• Ritter, V. 2010. Networks, Patrons, and Genres for Late Braj Bhasha Poets. Ratnakar and Hariaudh. In: F. Orsini (ed.). Before the Divide. Hindi and Urdu Literary Culture. New Delhi: Orient BlackSwan.

Identifiers

DOI

10.12797/CIS.15.2013.15.13