The role of the EU’s macro-regional policy in fostering the competitiveness of the Baltic Sea Region. Assessing the policy frameworks

• Authors: Czarnecka-Gallas Marta
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

This article presents the analysis of the EU’s macro-regional policy as a framework to enhance competitiveness and sustainable development. The Baltic Sea Region (BSR) – a home for the first EU’s macro-regional strategy launched in 2009 – is used as a case study. Focusing on the strategy’s objective "increase prosperity", the author examines policy changes leading to the EUSBSR Action Plan of 2021. Based on qualitative analysis of EU documents and BSR’s institutional potential, two hypotheses are verified: (1) the BSR’s approach to competitiveness has evolved to be more proactive, holistic, and sustainability-oriented; (2) this shift aligns with EU political context, EUSBSR maturity and regional socio-economic development. The research demonstrates that the macro-regional framework effectively integrates diverse competitiveness approaches, being a promising tool in fostering competitiveness in the EU.

Keywords

EN

economic integration; macro-regional policy; Baltic Sea Region; EUSBSR; regional development; competitiveness; economic efficiency

• Publisher: Wydział Nauk Politycznych i Studiów Międzynarodowych, Uniwersytet Warszawski
• Journal: Przegląd Europejski
• Year: 2025
• Issue: 2(76)
• Pages: 77 - 100

Dates

published

2025

Contributors

author

Czarnecka-Gallas Marta

• University of Gdańsk

References

• AIGINGER Karl (2021), European competitiveness and sustainable development – A policy-oriented response to 'Rethinking the role of the EU in enhancing European competitiveness', “Competitiveness Review”, vol. 31, no. 5. DOI: 10.1108/CR-03-2021-0039
• AIGINGER Karl, BÄRETHALER-SIEBER Susanne, VOGEL Johanna (2013), Competitiveness under new perspectives, “WWWforEurope Working Paper”, no. 44. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.1003.1525
• ANDRONICEANU Ane-Mari, KINNUNEN Jani, GEORGESCU Irina, ANDRONICEANU Armenia. (2020), A Multidimensional Approach to Competitiveness, Innovation and Well-Being in the EU Using Canonical Correlation Analysis, “Journal of Competitiveness”, vol. 12, issue 4. DOI: 10.7441/joc.2020.04.01
• BRISTOW Gillian (2005), Everyone’s a ‘winner’: problematising the discourse of regional competitiveness, “Journal of Economic Geography”, vol. 5. DOI: 10.1093/jeg/lbh063
• CZARNECKA-GALLAS Marta (2019), Strategia Unii Europejskiej dla Regionu Morza Bałtyckiego – udany eksperyment polityki makroregionalnej Unii Europejskiej?, „Samorząd Pomorza. Zeszyty Problemowe”, no. 7.
• EUROPEAN COMMISSION (1993), Growth, competitiveness, employment – The challenges and ways forward into the 21st century - White Paper, COM (93) 700 final, Brussels, 05.12.1993.
• EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2004), Commission Communication - Third progress report on economic and social cohesion: A New Partnership for Cohesion: Convergence, Competitiveness and Cooperation, COM(2004)107 final, Brussels, 18.02.2004.
• EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2009a), Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions concerning the European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region, COM (2009) 248 final, Brussels, 10.06.2009.
• EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2009b), Commission staff working document: European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region: Action plan, SEC(2009) 712, Brussels, 10.06.2009.
• EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2010), Communication from the Commission: EUROPE 2020 – A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth, COM (2010) 2020 final, Brussels, 3.03.2010.
• EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2021a), Commission staff working document: EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region: Action plan [COM(2009)248 final]. Revised Action Plan replacing the Action Plan of 17 March 2017 - SWD(2017) 118 final, SWD(2021) 24 final, Brussels, 15.02.2021.
• EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2021b), New EUSBSR Action Plan focused on recovery, https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/regio/items/710518/en (22.04.2021).
• EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2022), Commission suspends cross-border cooperation and transnational cooperation with Russia and Belarus, Press release, Brussels, https://enlargement.ec.europa.eu/news/commission-suspends-cross-border-cooperation-and-transnational-cooperation-russia-and-belarus-2022-03-04_en (04.03.2022).
• EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT (2000), Lisbon European Council. Presidency Conclusions: 23 and 24 March 2000, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/summits/lis1_en.htm (20.10.2024).
• EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT (2022), An EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region (EUSBSR), Briefing, European Parliamentary Research Service, PE 733.703, October 2022.
• EUROSTAT database (WWW), https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat (12.10.2024).
• EUSBSR website (WWW), http://www.eusbsr.eu/about (10.10.2024).
• GARDINER Ben, MARTIN Ron, TYLER Peter (2004), Competitiveness, Productivity and Economic Growth across the European Regions, “Regional Studies”, vol. 38(9). DOI: 10.1080/0034340042000292638
• GÄNZLE Stefan (2018), ‘Experimental Union’ and Baltic Sea cooperation: the case of the European Union’s Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region (EUSBSR), “Regional Studies, Regional Science”, vol. 5, no. 1. DOI: 10.1080/21681376.2018.1532315
• KETELS Christian, PORTER Michael E. (2021), Rethinking the role of the EU in enhancing European competitiveness, “Competitiveness Review”, vol. 31, no. 2. DOI: 10.1108/CR-08-2020-0100
• KRUGMAN Paul (1994), Competitiveness: A Dangerous Obsession, “Foreign Affairs”, vol. 73, issue 2.
• LIAKOPOULOS Dimitris (2018), The macro-regional strategies of the European Union: Between European territorial cooperation and multi-level governance, “Acta Universitatis Danubius. Relationes Internationales”, vol. 11, no. 2.
• LUCIAN Paul (2015), From The Lisbon Strategy To Europe 2020, “Studies in Business & Economics”, vol. 10(2).
• MEYER-STAMER Jörg (2016), Systematic Competitiveness and Local Economic Development, in: Shamim Bodhanya (ed.), Large Scale Systemic Change: Theories, Modelling and Practices, Nova Science, UK.
• NORTH Douglass (1990), Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, New York.
• PALMOWSKI Tadeusz (2021), The European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region and accomplishments, “Baltic Region”, vol. 13(1). DOI: 10.5922/2079-8555-2021-1-8
• PERRONS Diane (2012), Regional performance and inequality: linking economic and social development through a functional approach, “Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society”, vol. 5(1). DOI: 10.1093/cjres/rsr033
• PORTER Michael E. (1985), The Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance, New York.
• PORTER Michael E. (1998a), Clusters and the New Economics of Competition, “Harvard Business Review”, vol. 76, no. 6.
• PORTER Michael E. (1998b), The Competitive Advantage of Nations, New York.
• RODRIGUEZ-POSE Andrés (2013), Do institutions matter for regional development?, “Regional Studies”, vol. 47, no. 7, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2012.748978
• SŁOMCZYŃSKA Irma (2014), Strategie makroregionalne Unii Europejskiej jako instrument zarządzania wielopoziomowego, „Zeszyty Natolińskie”, no. 60.
• STORPER Michael (2005), Society, community and economic development, “Studies in Comparative International Development”, vol. 39, no. 4. DOI: 10.1007/BF02686164
• STREECK Wolfgang (1991), On the institutional conditions of diversified quality production, in: Egon Matzner, Wolfgang Streeck (eds), Beyond Keynesianism: Socioeconomics of production and full employment, Aldershot.
• SZEJGIEC-KOLENDA Barbara, DUMA Patryk (2020), Trade linkages within the Baltic Sea region – towards regional integration, “Przegląd Geograficzny”, vol. 92, no. 4. DOI: 10.7163/PrzG.2020.4.8
• SZULC Marta (2020), European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region and EU macro-regional approach – the analysis of ten years of the strategy implementation, “Przegląd Europejski”, vol. 2020, no. 3. DOI: 10.31338/1641-2478pe.3.20.2
• TALAR Sylwia (2016), Konkurencyjność jako cel polityki Unii Europejskiej, in: A. Grynia (ed.), Czynniki ograniczające oraz poprawiające konkurencyjność nowych krajów członkowskich Unii Europejskiej, Wilno.
• TABELLINI Guido, WYPLOSZ Charles (2006), Supply-side reforms in Europe: Can the Lisbon Strategy be repaired?, „Swedish Economic Policy Review”, vol. 13(1).
• TAUSCH Arno (2009), Titanic 2010? The European Union and its Failed Lisbon Strategy, New York.
• VOINESCU Razvan, MOISOIU Cristian (2015), Competitiveness, Theoretical and Policy Approaches. Towards a More Competitive EU, “Procedia Economics and Finance”, vol. 22. DOI: 10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00248-8
• YIN Robert K. (2009), Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 4th edition, Sage Publications.