Glosa aprobująca do wyroku TK z dnia 7 marca 2018 r., sygnatura akt K 2/17

• Authors: Pawłowski Sławomir

Title variants

EN

An Approving Commentary to the Sentence of the Constitutional Tribunal of 7.03.2018, ref. K 2/17

• Languages of publication: PL

Abstracts

EN

The subject of this gloss is a landmark ruling of the Constitutional Tribunal (CK) regarding one of the institutions of antiquity – preclusion. These issues in Polish administrative law are still controversial, and the views often differ significantly. The voted judgment deserves attention because it has not been explicitly stated in Polish jurisprudence for a long time that the rules in force in civil (general) law cannot be directly applied in public (special) law. CK argues that the justification of the institution of antiquity cannot be identical in public law as in private law, because the legal relations are vertical in the first and horizontal in the second. The indicated inequality of participants in the legal relationship and the pos- session of a professional clerical apparatus caring for the interests of the State, including property, means that the classic justification of the institution of an- tiquity, in particular the stabilizing and evidentiary function, are not a sufficient justification for using the preclusion. This is all the more justified when public law interference in property rights occurs without due warranty rights

Keywords

EN

expiration; prescription period; property rights; restriction of property rights; budget balance

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Jagielloński. Fundacja Utriusque Iuris
• Journal: Forum Prawnicze
• Year: 2019
• Issue: 2 (52)
• Pages: 92–103

Contributors

author

Pawłowski Sławomir

• Katedra Prawa Administracyjnego i Nauki o Administracji Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu