Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2013 | 58 | 6 (353) | 91-107

Article title

Rozpoznawanie protestów przez Kongresowe Biuro Obrachunkowe - postępowanie o udzielenie zamówienia publicznego w USA

Selected contents from this journal

Title variants

EN
Hearing of Bids by the U.S, Government Accountability Office – proceedings Related to Public Procurement

Languages of publication

PL

Abstracts

EN
In the United States, the Congress has authorised bid protests in recognition of their role in providing redress to disappointed bidders and in ensuring the integrity of the federal procurement process. By statute, three forums have authority to hear bid protests against the federal government: the procuring agency, the Government Accountability Office (GAO), and the Court of Federal Claims. The article discusses the issues that may be protested with GAO (i.e. possible grounds of protest), who and when may file a protest, who else can be a party in these protests, when GAO must render its final decision on the protest, and other potential conditions in such cases. The article also presents possible resolutions of these protests and legal effects of GAO’s nonbinding recommendations. At the end of the article, the author gives some bid protest statistics, as well as core advantages and disadvantages of this procedure.

Year

Volume

58

Issue

Pages

91-107

Physical description

Dates

published
2013-12

Contributors

  • Wydział Prawa i Administracji Uniwersytetu Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego

References

  • Dobrowolski Z. 2004. Kontrola wydatków publicznych w systemie demokracji amerykańskiej. Wydawnictwo Sejmowe.
  • Gebert S. 1981. Kongres Stanów Zjednoczonych Ameryki. Zarys monografii. Wrocław: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich, PAN: 83 i n.
  • Gordon D.I. 2013. “Bid Protests. The Costs are Real, But the Benefits Outweigh Them”. Public Contract Law Journa 42:3.
  • Metzger R. S., D. A. Lyons.2007. “A critical reassessment of the GAO bid-protest mechanism”. Wisconsin Law Review 1225: 1229-1230.
  • Trask R. R. 1991. GAO history 1921–1991. Waszyngton: General Accounting Office:121.
  • Nagle J. F., A.K. Lasky. 2010. “A Practitioner’s Road Map to GAO Bid Protests”. Construction Lawyer (30)1.
  • Manuel K. M., M. Schwartz. 2010. GAO Bid Protests: An Overview of Timeframes and Procedures. Congressional Research Service: 5.
  • Manuel K. M., M. Schwartz.2010. GAO Bid Protests: An Overview of Timeframes and Procedures. Congressional Research Service: 11-12.
  • White R. O. 2012. GAO bid protest overview. Waszyngton: United States Government Accountability Office.
  • Cordesman A. H., H. U. Kaeser. 2013. Defense Procurement by Paralysis. Costly Mortgages for the Next Administration.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

ISSN
0452-5027

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.desklight-ea789270-7dba-4f6c-bb75-55362016dd28
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.