Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


Journal

2012 | 153 | 135-150

Article title

Poczucie szczęścia homo oeconomicus i człowieka szczodrego

Authors

Content

Title variants

EN
Happiness of Homo Oeconomicus and Generous Man

Languages of publication

PL

Abstracts

EN
Happiness as an essential goal of human life is the subject of research of many scientific disciplines like philosophy, sociology, psychology, medicine, economics and theology. The aim of the article is to answer two basic questions: how happy can homo economicus be? and how happy can a generous man be? Firstly, a model of homo economicus is presented and then it is built into the model of generous man. The article presents results of empirical studies indicating happiness factors. On the basis of these, two main theses are formulated. The first states that money and higher income contribute to happiness, while the second one indicates that being generous also contributes to happiness. Measuring the strength of the impact of both factors on human happiness remains a methodological problem.

Contributors

  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa w Nowym Sączu , ul. Staszica 1, 33-300 Nowy Sącz

References

  • Bell D. 1994. Kulturowe sprzeczności kapitalizmu. Warszawa: PWN.
  • Baucells M., Sarin R.K. 2007. Does more money buy you more happiness? “Working Paper”. nr 683. Barcelona: University of Navarra.
  • Clark A. E., Frijters P., Shields M. 2007. Relative Income, Happiness and Utility: An Explanation for the Easterlin Paradox and Other Puzzles. „Discussion Papers”, nr 2840.
  • Gardawski J., L. Gilejko, J. Siewierski, R. Towalski. 2008. Socjologia gospodarki. Warszawa: Diffin.
  • Godbout J.T. 2005. Homo Donator versus homo oeconomicus. „Finance&The Common Good”.
  • Keen J. 2010. Unraveling the mystery of why we give, or don’t. „USA Today”.
  • Konow J., Earley J. 2007. The Hedonistic Paradox: Is Homo Economicus Happier?. Münich: Münich Personal RePEc Archive.
  • Layard R. 2003. Happiness: Has social science a clue?. London School of Economics.
  • Lee D.R. 2006. Who Says Money Cannot Buy Happiness?. „The Independent Review”, t. X, nr 3.
  • Moll J., F. Krueger, R. Zahn, M. Pardini, R. Oliveira-Souza. 2006. Human fronto–mesolimbic networks guide decisions about charitable donation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America. On-line: http://www.stonybrook.edu/bioethics/Artlicle%20Moll%20et%20al.%20CharitableDonationBrainPathways1.pdf.
  • Rogowski R. 2011. Opinie Wolontariuszy Stowarzyszenia Sursum Corda na temat wolontariatu. Raport z projektu „Wolontariat – pomagam, bo lubię“. Nowy Sącz.
  • Tatarkiewicz W. 2003. O szczęściu. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
  • Veenhoven R. 2000. The Four Qualities of Life. Ordering concepts and measures of the good life. „Journal of Happiness Studies”.
  • Veenhoven R. 2007. Measures of Gross National Happiness. „Statistics”. Knowledge Policy. OECD.
  • Więckowski P. 2011. Naukowy hedonizm jako podstawa krytycznej oceny przemian społecznych – ekonomia szczęścia Richarda Layarda, Marka Anielskiego i Richarda Easterlina. „Etyka w życiu gospodarczym“, t. 14, nr 1.
  • Youngsteadt E. 2008. The Secret of Happiness? Giving. „ScienceNow”.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.desklight-eba7b071-1202-47f6-bdeb-06f7ba8f9d45
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.