Sectoral Structure Change Modeling of European Oil and Gas Producing Country’S Economy

• Authors: Viacheslav Alexandrovich Perepelkin , Elena Viacheslavovna Perepelkina
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

In this paper, we consider identifying features of sectoral structuring within the national economy that has definite foreign trade product specialization. Examination of the sector-specific division methodology enabled identification of its strong association with certain sector dominance in the economy. It is against this background that we offer an explanation for the delay in transferring from the post-Soviet to the applicable international classification of economic structure elements in Russia and Belarus. We perform analysis of the three-component P-S-T model (primary, secondary, tertiary sector) using statistical and econometric methods and define properties of the sectoral shares dynamics in national economies of oil and gas producing countries. Analysis of the Russian and Norwegian economies’ intersectoral changes suggests that it is necessary for the government to develop and implement selective structural policy to overcome the existing structural disproportions.

Keywords

EN

sector; intersectoral shift; minerals extraction; deindustrialization; tertiarization

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: ECONOMICS
• Year: 2015
• Volume: 3
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 7-18

Dates

published

2015-12-01

online

2015-12-30

Contributors

author

Viacheslav Alexandrovich Perepelkin

• Samara State University of Economics, Russia

author

Elena Viacheslavovna Perepelkina

• Samara State University of Economics, Russia

References

• Arrow, K. (1962). The Economic Implications of Learning-by-doing. Review of Economic Studies, 80, 155-174.[Crossref]
• Belstat. (2012). National Statistical Committee of the Republic of Belarus, All-State Classification of Economic Activity (ОКED). Retrived October, 21, 2015, from http://www.belstat.gov.ru/homep/ru/klassificator.
• Bhagwati, J. (1958). Immiserizing Growth: A Geometrical Note. Review of Economic Studies 25, 201-205.[Crossref]
• Bjorvatn, K., Farzanegan, M. R. & Schneider, F. (2012). Resource Curse and Power Balance: Evidence from Oil-Rich Countries. World Development, 40, 1308-1316.[WoS][Crossref]
• Chenery, H. B. & Taylor, L. J. (1968).Development patterns: Among Countries and Over Time. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 50, 391-416.[Crossref]
• Chenery, H. B., Robinson, S. & Syrquin, M. (1986). Industrialization and Growth: A Comparative Study. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Cheng, W. L., Sachs, J. & Yang, X. (2004). An extended Heckscher-Ohlin model with transaction costs and technological comparative advantage. Economic Theory, 23, 671-688.[Crossref]
• Cherif, R. (2013). The Dutch disease and the technological gap. Journal of Development Economics, 101, 248-255.[WoS][Crossref]
• Clark, C. G. (1940). The Conditions of Economic Progress. London: Macmilla.
• Dietrich, A. & Krüger, J. J. (2010). Long-run sectoral development: Time-series evidence for the German economy. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 21, 111-122.
• Dülger, F., Lopcu, K., Burgaç, A. & Balli, E. (2013). Is Russia suffering from Dutch Disease? Cointegration with structural break. Resources Policy, 38, 605-612.[Crossref][WoS]
• Echevarria, C. (1997). Changes in sectoral composition associated with economic growth. International Economic Review, 38, 431-452.[Crossref]
• Ellman, M. (1981). Natural Gas, Restructuring and Re-Industrialization: The Dutch Experience of Industrial Policy. In Barker, T. & Brailovsky V. (Eds.). Oil or Industry? (pp. 27-29). London: Academic Press.
• Eurostat. (2013). Statistical Offices of the European Union, NACE Ред.2 - Structure and explanatory. Retrived October, 21, 2015, from http://www.circa.europa.eu/irc/dsis/nacecpacon/info/data/en/NACE%20Rev%202%20-structure%20+%20explanatory%20notes%20-%20RU.pdf.
• Fisher, A. G. B. (1939). Production, primary, secondary and tertiary. Economic Record, 15, 24-38.[Crossref]
• Fisher, A. G. B. (1952). A note on tertiary production. Economic Journal, 62, 820-834.[Crossref]
• Fourastie, J. (1949). Le Grand Espoir du XXe Siècle: Progrès Technique, Progr‘s Économique, Progr‘s Social. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
• Heil, H. & Steinbach, A. (2011). Damit Deutschland vorankommt: Kompass für eine progressive Wirtschaftspolitik. Berlin: Vorwärtsbuch.
• Klodt, H. (2000). Structural Change Towards Services: the German Experience. University of Birmingham.
• Kuznets, S. (1971). Economic Growth of Nations: Total Output and Production Structure. Harvard University Press.
• Kuznets, S. (1973). Modern economic growth: findings and reflections. The American Economic Review, 63, 247-258.
• Ngai, L. R. & Pissarides, C. A. (2007). Structural change in a multi-sector model of growth. The American Economic Review, 97, 429-443.[Crossref]
• Opp, M. M., Sonnenschein, H. F. & Tombazos, C. G. (2009). Rybczynski’s Theorem in the Heckscher- Ohlin World - Anything Goes. Journal of International Economics, 79, 137-142.[Crossref][WoS]
• Pasinetti, L. L. (1981). Structural Change and Economic Growth. Theoretical Essay on the Dynamics of the Wealth of Nations. Cambridge University Press.
• Pasinetti, L. L. (1993). Structural Economic Dynamics. A Theory of the Economic Consequences of Human Learning. Cambridge University Press.
• Pelzer, G., 2009. Deindustrialisierung in Deutschland. Hamburg: Verlag Dr. Kovač.
• Peneder, M., Kaniovski, S. & Dachs, B. (2000). What follows tertiarisation? Structural change and the role of knowledge-based services. The Service Industries Journal, 23, 47-66.[Crossref]
• Romer, P. (1986). Increasing returns and longrun growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94, 1002-1037.[Crossref]
• Rosstat. (2005). Russian Statistical Yearbook, Gross value added by branches and sectors in 2000. Retrived October, 21, 2015, from http://www.gks.ru/bgd/regl/b05_13/IssWWW.exe/Stg/11-08.htm.
• Rosstat. (2011). Russian Statistical Yearbook, Gross value added by branches and sectors in 2001. Retrived October, 21, 2015, from http://www.gks.ru/bgd/regl/b05_13/IssWWW.exe/Stg/11-09.htm.
• Rosstat. (2012). Russian Federal State Statistics Service, All-Russian Classifier of Types of Economic Activity (ОКVED). Retrived October, 21, 2015, from http://www.gks.ru/bgd/free/b02_60/Main.htm.
• Rosstat. (2013). Russian Federal State Statistics Service, Nominal volume of gross domestic product produced. Retrived October, 21, 2015, from http://www.gks.ru/bgd/free/b.01_19/IssWWW.exe/Stg/d000/i000010r.htm.
• Rosstat. (2015). Russian Federal State Statistics Service, Gross domestic product and gross value added by kind of economic activity. Retrived October, 21, 2015, from http://www.gks.ru/wps/wcn/connect/rosstat_main/rosstat/ru/statistics/accounts/#.
• Rybczynski, T. M. (1955). Factor Endowments and Relative Commodity Prices. Economica, 22, 336-341.[Crossref]
• Stampfl, N. S. (2011). Die Zukunft der Dienstleistungsökonomie. Momentaufnahme und Perspektiven. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
• Statistics Norway. (2005). Statistical Yearbook of Norway. Oslo: Autor.
• Statistics Norway. (2006). Statistical Yearbook of Norway. Oslo: Autor. Statistics Norway. (2007). Statistical Yearbook of Norway. Oslo: Autor.
• Statistics Norway. (2008). Statistical Yearbook of Norway. Oslo: Autor.
• Statistics Norway. (2009). Statistical Yearbook of Norway. Oslo: Autor.
• Statistics Norway. (2011). Statistical Yearbook of Norway. Oslo: Autor.
• Statistics Norway. (2013). Statistical Yearbook of Norway. Oslo: Autor.
• Statistics Norway. (2015). Annual national accounts, 2014. Retrived October, 21, 2015, from http://www.ssb.no/en/nasjonalregnskap-og-konjunkturer/statistikker/nr/aar/2015-05-20?fane=tabel&sort=nummer8tabel=228320#tab-tabel.
• Syrquin, M. (2010). Kuznets and Pasinetti on the study of structural transformation: Never the Twain shall meet? Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 21, 248-257.
• Wolfe, M. (1955). The concept of economic sectors. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69, 402-420.
• Young, A. (1993). Invention and bounded learning by doing. Journal of Political Economy, 101, 443-472 [Crossref]

Identifiers

DOI

10.1515/eoik-2015-0017