The Amount of Information Remembered by the Perpetrator in the Context of the Application of the Guilty Knowledge Technique in Criminal Investigation ‒ a Pilot Study
Ben-Shakhar G., Elaad E., Th e Guilty Knowledge Test (GKT) as an Application of Psychophysiology: Future Prospects and Obstacles, [in:] M. Kleiner (ed.), Handbook of Polygraph Testing, Academic Press 2002, 87-102.
Bradley M.T., Warfi eld J.F., Innocence, Information and the Guilty Knowledge Test in the Detection of Deception, Polygraph 1986, 15, 3, 183-194.
Christianson S.A., Freij I., Von Vogelsang E., Searching for Off enders’ Memories of Violent Crimes [in:] Christianson S.A. (ed.), Off enders’ Memories of Violent Crimes, John Wiley and Sons Ltd. 2007.
Elaad E., Detection of Guilty Knowledge in Real-Life Criminal Investigations, Journal of Applied Psychology 1990, 75, 5, 521-529.[Crossref]
Ellad E., Th e Challenge of the Concealed Knowledge Polygraph Test, Expert Evidence 1998, 6, 3, 161-187.
Elaad E., Ginton A., Jungman N., Detection Measures in Real-Life Criminal Guilty Knowledge Tests, Journal of Applied Psychology 1992, 77, 5, 757-767.[Crossref]
Gaines K.H., Utility and Numerical Evaluation of the Guilty Knowledge Test, Polygraph 2013, 43, 2, 173-190.
Gołaszewski M., Validated Techniques and Scoring Models for PDD Test Data Analysis - Conclusions from the 2011 APA Report, European Polygraph 2012, 6, 4, 227-240.
Krapohl D.J., McCloughan J.B., Senter S.M., How to Use the Concealed Information Test, Polygraph 2009, 38, 1, 34-49.
Lykken D.T., Th e GSR in the Detection of Guilt, Journal of Applied Psychology 1959, 43, 6, 385-388.[Crossref]
Lykken D.T., Psychology and the Lie-Detector Industry, American Psychologist 1974, 29, 10, 25-739.[Crossref]
Lykken D.T., Th e Validity of the Guilty Knowledge Technique: Th e Eff ects of Faking, Journal of Applied Psychology 1960, 44, 4, 258-262.[Crossref]
Konieczny J., Fraś M., Widacki J., Pochodzenie ukrytej informacji a niektóre cechy osobowości w badaniu poligrafi cznym, Archiwum Medycyny Sądowej i Kryminalistyki 1984, XXXIV, 1, 25-30.
MacLaren, V.V., A Quantitative Review of the Guilty Knowledge Test, Journal of Applied Psychology 2001, 86, 4, 674-683.[Crossref]
Meta-Analytic Survey of Criterion Accuracy of Validated Polygraph Techniques. Report Prepared for the American Polygraph Association Board of Directors, Polygraph Special Edition 2011, 40, 4.
Podlesny J.A., Is the Guilty Knowledge Polygraph Technique Applicable in Criminal Investigations? A Review of FBI Case Records, Polygraph 1994, 23, 1, 85-94.
Podlesny J.A., A Paucity of Operable Case Facts Restricts Applicability of the Guilty Knowledge Technique in FBI Criminal Polygraph Examinations, Forensic Sciences Communication 2003, 5, 3.
Pollock Ph. H., When the Killer Suff ers: Post-Traumatic Stress Reactions Following Homicide, Legal and Criminological Psychology 1999, 4, 2, 185-202. [Crossref]
Widacki J.(ed.), Badania poligrafi czne w Polsce, Ofi cyna Wydawnicza AFM 2014.
Widacki J., Logical Identity of Conclusions from Polygraph Testing Performed in Control Questions test (CQT) and Guilty Knowledge Test (GKT) Techniques, European Polygraph 2011, 5, 1, 5-10.
Widacki J., Wprowadzenie do problematyki badań poligrafi cznych, Wydawnictwo MSW, Warszawa 1981.
Widacki J., W sprawie wyboru techniki badania poligrafi cznego. Czy technika oparta na testach GKT (CIT) jest lepsza od techniki opartej na testach CQ?, Problemy Kryminalistyki 2011, 273, 5-10.
Wójcikiewicz J., CIT czy CQT?, Problemy Kryminalistyki 2012, 275, 15-18.
Wójcikiewicz J., Kulicki M., Ekspertyza wariografi czna, [in:] Wójcikiewicz J. (ed.), Ekspertyza sądowa. Zagadnienia wybrane, 2nd ed, Ofi cyna Wolters Kluwer Business, Warszawa 2007.