English Affixal Nominalizations Across Language Registers

• Authors: Wojciech Guz
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

This paper is a study of register variation as observed in the distribution and productivity of English nominalizing suffixes. Little if anything is known from previous research about whether or not morphological structure beyond the nature of the rightmost affix is a conditioning factor in register variation. As a consequence, nominalizations ending in a particular affix, or virtually all nominalizations tend to be somewhat superficially treated as collectively more characteristic of one register than another. This study fills this research gap by showing that the suffixes exhibit preferences as to their occurrence in particular registers and that, in the case of the most common suffixes (-ness, -ity, -ion), the internal morphological make-up of their base forms may also significantly bear on their quantitative distributions. As regards morphological productivity, the suffixes will uncontroversially exhibit varied degrees of productivity. More interestingly, however, our analysis shows that the morphological constitution of the base form may still influence the probability of a new word coming into existence, and this probability will further be conditioned by register preferences.

Keywords

EN

Register variation; nominalizations; productivity; distribution

• Publisher: De Gruyter
• Journal: Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics
• Year: 2009
• Volume: 45
• Issue: 4
• Pages: 461-485

Dates

published

2009-12-01

online

2010-01-13

Contributors

author

Wojciech Guz

• John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin

References

• Aronoff, M. 1976. Word formation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Anderson, M. 1979. Noun Phrase Structure. (Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.)
• Baayen, H. 1992. "Quantitative aspects of morphological productivity". In: Booij, G. and J. van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1991. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 109-149.
• Baayen, H. and R. Lieber. 1991. "Productivity and English derivation: a corpus-based study". Linguistics 29(4). 801-844.
• Baayen, H. and A. Renouf. 1996. "Chronicling the Times: productive lexical innovations in an English newspaper". Language 72. 69-96.[Crossref]
• Bauer, L. 2001. Morphological productivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Biber, D. 1988. Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Biber, D., S. Conrad and R. Reppen. 1998. Corpus linguistics. Investigating language structure and use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Biber D., S. Johansson, G. Leech, S. Conrad and E. Finegan. 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
• Biber, D. and S. Conrad. 2001. "Register variation: A corpus approach". In: Schiffrin, D., D. Tannen and H. Hamilton (eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. 175-196.
• Chomsky, N. 1970. "Remarks on nominalizations". In: Jacobs, R. and P. Rosenbaum (eds.), Readings in English transformational grammar. Waltham, MA: Ginn and Company. 184-221.
• Hay, J. 2003. Causes and consequences of word structure. New York and London: Routledge.
• Hay, J. and H. Baayen. 2003. "Phonotactics, parsing and productivity". Italian Journal of Linguistics 1. 99-130.
• Hay, J. and I. Plag. 2004. "What constrains possible suffix combinations? On the interaction of grammatical and processing restrictions in derivational morphology". Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22. 565-596.
• Lees, R. 1960. The grammar of English nominalizations. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.
• Lieber, R. 2005. "English word-formation processes". In: Štekauer, P. and R. Lieber (eds.), Handbook of word-formation. Dordrecht: Springer. 429-448.
• Marchand, H. 1969. The categories and types of present-day English word-formation. (2nd revised ed.) München: C.H. Beck.
• Marle, J. van. 1992. "The relationship between morphological productivity and frequency: A comment on Baayen's performance oriented conception of morphological productivity". In: Booij, G. and J. Van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1991. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 151-163.
• Plag, I. 1999. Morphological productivity. Structural constraints in English derivation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
• Plag, I. 2003. Word-formation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Plag, I., C. Dalton-Puffer and H. Baayen. 1999. "Morphological productivity across speech and writing". English Language and Linguistics 3(2). 209-228.[Crossref]
• Selkirk, E. 1982. The syntax of words. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/v10010-009-0030-6