Transforming the Classroom into a Reflective Community: A Blended Learning Instructional Approach

• Authors: Nikolaos Dovros , Vassilios Makrakis
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Critical and reflective thinking is acknowledged as one of the key skills within education for sustainable development whereas sustainable development requires a shift in the mental models which frame our thinking and inform our decisions and actions. This paper describes the implementation of a blended learning lesson unit which aimed at activating pupils’ reflective thinking in order to negotiate the controversial topic of genetically modified food (GMF). It describes a small case study that was implemented in a semi-rural school in Chania, Crete, with the participation of 23 pupils from Form 6. Specific changes in the pedagogical practices were adopted, pertaining to content, time and space conventions and the use of online learning activities. The instructional design incorporated a five-stage instructional session, which started by the introduction of a problematic situation, continued with the infusion of cognitive dissonance procedures and ended with a reflective evaluation activity. The pupils’ stances towards the open learning procedure and the integration of online activities were positive, while certain changes in their beliefs about the issue of GMF were observed, due to the design of the learning approach.

Keywords

EN

blended learning; critical thinking; reflective thinking; education for sustainability; problem-based learning

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability
• Year: 2012
• Volume: 14
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 73-88

Dates

published

2012-12-01

online

2013-03-27

Contributors

author

Nikolaos Dovros

• Department of Primary Education, University of Crete, 74100, Rethymnon, Crete, Greece.

author

Vassilios Makrakis

• University of Crete, Greece

References

• Aslanidou, S., & Menexes, G. (2007). Youth and the Internet: Uses and practices in the home. Computers & Education, 51, 1375-1391.[WoS]
• Collins, A. (1991). The role of computer technology in restructuring schools. Phi DeltaKappan, 73, 28-36.
• Cummings, J. (2000). Academic language learning, transformative pedagogy, and information technology: Towards a critical balance. TESOL Quarterly, 34(3), 537-548.[Crossref]
• Dewey, J. (1997). How we think. New York: Dover Publications Ink.
• Dziuban, C., Hartman, J., & Moskal, P. (2004). Blended learning. Educause, 7, 1-12.
• European Commission. (2002). Towards a knowledge based Europe. The European Union andthe information society. Retrieved April 16, 2009, from http://ec.europa.eu/publications/booklets/move/36/en.pdf
• Fernandez-Balboa, J., & Marshall, J. (1994). Dialogical pedagogy in teacher education: Toward an education for democracy. Journal of Teacher Education, 45(3), 172-182. DOI: 10.1177/0022487194045003003.[Crossref]
• Fernández-Balboa, J. (1998). The practice of critical pedagogy: Critical self-reflection as praxis. Teaching Education, 9(2), 47-53. DOI: 10.1080/10476210.1998.10335494.[Crossref]
• Franklin, T., & van Harmelen, M. (2007). Web 2.0 for content, for learning and teaching inhigher education. London: Joint Information Systems Committee.
• Garner, R., & Gillingham, M. G. (1996). Internet communication in six classrooms:Conversations across time, space, and culture. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Huckle, J. (2006). Education for sustainable development: A briefing paper for the trainingand development agency for schools. Retrieved July 16, 2008, from http://www.ttrb.ac.uk/Browse2.aspx?anchorId=14633&selectedId=14634
• Kalantzis, M. (2004). Diversity, new technologies and new learning. Paper presented at an international conference on computers in education, RMIT, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
• Kostoulas-Makrakis, N. (2011). Developing and applying a critical and transformative model to address education for sustainable development in teacher education. Journal of TeacherEducation for Sustainability, 12(2), 17-26. DOI: 10.2478/v10099-009-0051-0.[Crossref]
• Laurillard, D. (2008). The pedagogical challenges to collaborative technologies. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4, 5-20. DOI: 10.1007/s11412-008-9056-2.[Crossref]
• Lim, L. Y. L. (2009). A comparison of students’ reflective thinking across different years in a problem-based learning environment. Instructional Science, 39(2), 171-188.[WoS]
• Makrakis, V., & Kostoulas-Makrakis, N. (2005). Techno-sciences and mathematics: Vehicles for a sustainable future and global understanding. Proceedings of the 2nd InternationalConference on Hands-on Science (pp. 103-108). Crete: University of Crete.
• Merrill, M. D., Drake, L., Lacy, M. J., Pratt, J., & ID2 Research Group. (1996). Reclaiming instructional design. Educational Technology, 36(5), 5-7.
• Merrill, M. D. (1997). Instructional strategies that teach. CBT Solutions, Nov./Dec., 1-11.
• Meyer, W. J. (1977). The effects of education as an institution. American Journal of Sociology, 83(1), 55-77.[Crossref]
• Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Mezirow, J. (1997). Transformative learning: Theory to practice. New Directions for Adult &Continuing Education, 74, 5-12.
• Paavlova, S., & Hakkarainen, K. (2009). From meaning making to joint construction of knowledge practices and artefacts: A trialogical approach to CSCL. Proceedings of the9th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (pp. 83-92). Kallithea: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
• Palloff, R., & Pratt, K. (1999). Building learning communities in cyberspace: Effective strategiesfor online classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Papastergiou, M., & Solomonidou, C. (2005). Gender issues in Internet access and favourite Internet activities among Greek high school pupils inside and outside school. Computers& Education, 44(4), 377-393.
• Rogers, R. R. (2001). Reflection in higher education: A concept analysis. Innovative HigherEducation, 26(1), 37-57.
• Seethaler, S., & Linn, M. (2004). Genetically modified food in perspective: An inquiry-based curriculum to help middle school students make sense of tradeoffs. International Journalof Science Education, 26(14), 1765-1785.
• Simons, K. D., & Ertmer, P. (2006). Scaffolding disciplined inquiry in problem-based learning environments. International Journal of Learning, 1(6), 297-305.
• UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation). (2011).
• Education for sustainable development. An expert review of processes and learning. Paris: UNESCO.

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/v10099-012-0010-z