The Formation and Destruction of Social Capital - Lessons from East German Rural Restructuring

• Authors: Lutz Laschewski
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Twenty years after German unification, rural East Germany still remains in deep economic crisis. The fact that the physical, social and private infrastructure have improved significantly, but with seemingly little effect on the economic performance and negative demographic trends, raises the question of alternative, institutional and social explanations for the current crisis. In this context this paper explores the concept of social capital and its relation to rural development in order to understand the current rural crisis in East Germany. It describes the process of agricultural restructuring after unification and analyses the processes of formation and destruction of different forms of social capital in this process.It is argued that social capital is connected with particular institutions and activities. In the case of Rural East Germany it was difficult for many actors to draw on network relations, simply because those networks vanished after having lost their meaning, institutional and physical basis. However, the new institutional framework, which has been transferred from the West, does not offer suitable incentives for the formation of other, new forms of social capital that are necessary to overcome the rural crisis.A generalization from the East German experience is that it is important to identify the base of social capital and thereby its likely durability in times of change. If an economic, social or cultural function is lost, it is likely that social capital related to this function will also be destroyed. However, this also gives room for careful optimism, due to the fact that new economic, social or cultural activities may serve as a basis for new social capital.

Keywords

EN

social capital; paternalism; east germany; agricultural employment; farm structures; agricultural restructuring; rural crisis

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Eastern European Countryside
• Year: 2009
• Volume: 15
• Pages: 91-110

Dates

published

2009-01-01

online

2010-01-25

Contributors

author

Lutz Laschewski

References

• Ackers, P. and Black, J., Paternalist Capitalism: An Organization Culture in Transition, in: M. Cross and G. Payne (eds.), Work and the Enterprise Culture, London 1991: Falmer Press, pp. 30-56.
• Albach, H. and Witt, P., Transformationsprozesse in ehemals Volkseigenen Betrieben, Stuttgart 1993.
• BBR, Raumordnungsbericht 2000, Bonn 2000.
• Beckmann, V. and Hagedorn, V., Decollectivisation and privatisation policies and resulting structural changes of agriculture in Eastern Germany, in: JFM. Swinnen, A. Buckwell and E. Mathijs (eds.), Agricultural Privatisation, Land Reform and Farm Restructuring in Central and Eastern Europe, Surrey 1997: Ashgate, pp. 105-160.
• Beetz, S., ‘Woher die Menschen und wohin mit dem Land?’, Berliner Debatte INITIAL no 12 (2001), pp. 6, 77-86.
• Berking, H., ‘Das Leben geht weiter. Politik und Alltag in einem deutschen Dorf’, Soziale Welt, no 46, 1995, pp. 342-353.
• BMELF (ed.), Agrarbericht der Bundesregierung, Bonn, BMELF 1991, 1994, 1998, 2000, 2004.
• Brauer, K., ‘Unsere Lösung - Ihr Problem’, Berliner Debatte INITIAL, no 12 (2001) 6, pp. 52-64.
• Brauer, K., Willisch, A. und Ernst, F., Intergenerationelle Beziehungen, Lebenslaufperspektiven und Familie im Spannungsfeld von Kollektivierung und Transformation, in: L. Clausen (ed.), Gesellschaften im Umbruch - Verhandlungen des 27. Kongresses der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Soziologie in Halle an der Saale 1995, Frankfurt a.M./New York 1996, Campus.
• Bruckmeier, K., ‘LEADER in Germany and the discourse of autonomous regional development’, Sociologia Ruralis, no 49 (2), 2000, pp. 219-227.
• Brussig, M., Lohr, K., Semlinger, K., Sorge, A., Strowald, U. (), Kleinbetriebe in den neuen Bundesländern, KSPW Beiträge zu den Berichten zum sozialen und Politischen Wandel in Ostdeutschland 1.7, Opladen, 1997.
• Burt, R.S., Structural Holes. The Social Structure of Competition, Cambridge/Mass. 1992; Harvard University Press.
• Dasgupta, P. and Serageldin, I. (eds.) (), Social Capital - A Multifaceted Perspective, World Bank, Washington 2000, D.C.
• Emirbayer, M. and Goodwin, J., ‘Network analysis, culture, and the problem of agency’, American Journal of Sociology no 99, 1994, pp. 1411-1454.
• Forstner, B. and Isermeyer, F., Transformation of Agriculture in East Germany after Reunification, in: S. Tangermann, (ed.), Agriculture in Germany, Frankfurt a.M 2000, DLG, pp. 61-90.
• Granovetter, M., ‘Economic Action and Social Structure’, American Journal of Sociology, 1985, pp. 481-510.
• Großkopf, W. und Kappelmann, K.-H., Bedeutung der Nebenbetriebe der LPGen für die Entwicklungschancen im ländlichen Raum, in: G. Schmitt and S. Tangermann (eds.), Internationale Agrarpolitik und Entwicklung der Weltagrarwirtschaft. Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V., Band 28, Münster 1992: Landwirtschaftsverlag.
• Herrenknecht, A., ‘Der Riß durch die Dörfer - Innere Umbrüche in den Dörfern der neuen Bundesländeri, in: Agrarsoziale Gesellschaft, Dorf- und Regionalentwicklung in den neuen Bundesländern - Beiträge aus der Praxis, Kleine Reihe no 54, Göttingen, 1995, pp. 50-64.
• Hubatsch, K., Krambach, K., Müller, J., Siebert, R. und Vogel, O., Genossenschaftsbauern - Existenzformen und Lebensweise im Umbruch, Berlin, Forschungsbericht 1991.
• Jansen, D., Einführung in die Netzwerkanalyse: Grundlagen, Methoden, Anwendungen, Opladen 1999: Leske and Buderich.
• Kolloge, S. (), ‘Die Wirkung der Agenda 21, Eine institutionentheoretische Wirkungs-analyse am Beispiel von sechs Kommunen im ländlichen Raum Großbritanniens und Deutschlands’, Berlin, unveröffentlichte PhD Dissertation, 2000.
• Lampland, M., The Advantages of Being Collectivised, in: Ch.M. Hann, (ed.), Post-socialism - Ideals, ideologies and practices in Eurasia, London 2002: Routledge.
• Laschewski, L., Von der LPG zur Agrargenossenschaft. Untersuchungen zur Transformation genossenschaftlich organisierter Agrarunternehmen in Ostdeutschland, Berlin 1998.
• Laschewski, L., ‘The Formation and Transformation of Business Co-operation - Some Preliminary Observations from the North East of England’, Centre for Rural Economy Working Paper Series no 46, Newcastle upon Tyne 2000: Centre for Rural Economy.
• Laschewski, L. and R. Siebert, Power and Rural Development: Social Capital Formation in Rural East Germany, in: H. Goverde, H. de Haan and M. Baylina (eds.), Power and Gender in European Rural Development, Aldershot, Ashgate, 2004, pp. 20-31.
• Laschewski, L. (), Systems of Local Self-Administration after Agricultural Transformation: Experiences of a local resource management project in East Germany, in: Behera, Maguni (eds.), Globalising Rural Development.: Competing Paradigms and Emerging Realities, London/New Dehli 2006: Sage.
• Laschewski, L., C. Neu und T. Fock (), ‘Aktive Bürgerschaft in der ländlichen Entwicklung: Fünf Gemeinden in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern’, Berichte über Landwirtschaft 2008, no 3, 2008.
• Laschewski, L. and Siebert R., ‘Effiziente Agrarwirtschaft und arme ländliche Ökonomie?’, Berliner Debatte INITIAL no 12 (2001) 6, 2001, pp. 31-42.
• Laschewski, L., Teherani-Kroenner, P. und Bahner, T. (), Recent Rural Restructuring in East and West Germany: Facts and Backgrounds, in: I. Kovach, K. Halfacree and R. Woodward (eds.), Leadership and Local Power in European Rural Development, Aldershot: Ashgate, 2002, pp. 145-172.
• Lowe, P., Murdoch, J. and Ward, N. (), Networks in Rural Development: Beyond Exogenous and Endogenous Models, in: D. van der Ploeg, J. and van G. Dijk (eds.), Beyond Modernisation, 1995, pp. 87-105.
• Newby, H., The Deferential Worker: A Study of Farm Workers in East Anglia, London 1977, Allen Lane Penguin Books.
• Paldam, M. and Svendsen, T. G., ‘An Essay on Social Capital: looking for the fire behind the smoke’, European Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 16 (2000), pp. 339-366.
• Ploeg, J. D. van der and Long, A. (eds.), Born from within: practice and perspectives of endogenous rural development, Assen 1994: Van Gorcum.
• Ploeg, J. D. van der and van Dijk, G. (eds.), Beyond Modernization - The Impact of Endogenous Rural Development, Assen 1995: Van Gorcum.
• Pongratz, H. and Kreil, M., ‘Möglichkeiten einer eigenständigen Regionalentwicklung’, Zeitschrift für Agrargeschichte und Agrarsoziologie no 39 (1991), Heft 91, pp. 91-111.
• Pretty, J. and Ward, H., ‘Social Capital and Environment’, World Development Vol. 29, no 2, 2001, pp. 209-227.
• Putnam, Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy, Princeton 1993: Princeton University Press.
• Rees, G. and Thomas, M., From Coalminers to Entrepreneurs? A Case Study in the Sociology of Re-industrialization, in: M. Cross and G. Payne (eds.), Work and the Enterprise Culture, 1991, pp. 57-78.
• Rodewald, B., ‘Glasow - ein Dorf im Schatten der Grenze’, FAA, Ländliche Lebensverhältnisse im Wandel 1952, 1972 und 1992, Bonn 1994, pp. 443-468.
• Schuman, M. D. and Anderson, C., ‘The Dark Side of the Force: A Case Study of Restructuring and Social Capital’, Rural Sociology 64 (3), 1999, pp. 351-372.
• Siebert, R., Wandel ländlicher Räume - soziale Rahmenbedingungen für die Landwirtschaft, in: Aktionsbündnis ländlicher Raum: Ländliche Räume, Landschaft und Landwirtschaft 2010, DLG Arbeitsunterlagen, Frankfurt a. Main 1999, pp. 7-15.
• Siebert, R. und Laschewski, L., Becoming a part of the union - Changing Rurality in East Germany, in: H. Torvey and M. Blanc (eds.), Food, Nature, and Society - Rural Life in Late Modernity, Aldershot 2001: Ashgate, pp. 235-252.
• Slee, B., Theoretical Aspects of the Study of Endogenous Development, in: J. D. van der Ploeg and A. Long (eds.), Born from within, 1994, pp. 184-194.
• Terluin, I. J., ‘Rural Regions in the EU - Exploring differences in economic development’, Utrecht/Groningen, Nederlandse Geografische Studies no 289, 2001.
• Thumfart, A., Die politische Integration Ostdeutschlands, Frankfurt a.M. 2002, edition Suhrkamp.
• Uphoff, N., ‘Learning About and For Participation: From Theoretical and Empirical Studies to Practical Experience, and back to Theory’, Canadian Journal of Development Studies XIX (3), 1998, pp. 439-460.
• Warner, M., ‘Social Capital Construction and the Role of the Local State’, Rural Sociology no 64 (3), 1999, pp. 373-393.
• Willisch, A., Drogen am Eichberg oder Feuer im Ausländerheim, in: H. Bude und A. Willisch (eds.), Exklusion - Die Debatte über die "Überflüssigen", Frankfurt a.M 2008., Suhrkamp, pp. 50-63.
• Wilson, O. and Klages, B., Farm restructuring in the ex-GDR: towards a new farm model?, Journal of Rural Studies, vol. 17, 2001, pp. 277-279.
• Woolcook, M., ‘Social Capital and Economic Development: Toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework’, Theory and Society, vol. 27, 1998, pp. 151-208.
• Zierold, K. (), Veränderungen von Lebenslagen in ländlichen Räumen der neuen Bundesländer, in: A. Becker (ed.) Regionale Strukturen im Wandel, 1997, pp. 501-567.

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/v10130-009-0006-4