Scientific and Technological Progress, Political Beliefs and Environmental Sustainability

• Authors: Vassilios Makrakis
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

With the development of science and technology, a basically optimistic ideology of progress has emerged. This deterministic attitude has been challenged in recent decades as a result of harmful side-effects generated by the way technology and science have been approached and used. The study presented here is a part of a larger international and comparative study dealing with global/environmental issues related to political orientation, science and technology. 3 080 pre-service teachers from Finland, Greece, Sweden, Japan and Holland answered a closed-end survey instrument. The results of this study show that none of the sample country respondents identified themselves as optimists concerning the impact of science and technology on society and environment. The no-stance and the pessimistic attitudes towards technology and science seem to derive from the human and environmental costs associated with science and technology development. A strong connection was found between environmental consciousness and attitudes towards the role and impact of science and technology on society. These results indicate that society and education, in particular, should place higher critical concerns about scientific and technological issues and their relation to the development of a sustainable society.

Keywords

EN

science; technology; political beliefs; environmental sustainability

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education
• Year: 2012
• Volume: 3
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 63-74

Dates

published

2012-01-01

online

2013-06-08

Contributors

author

Vassilios Makrakis

• University of Crete, Greece

References

• Aoyagi-Usui, M., Vinken, H., & Kuribayashi, A. (2003). Pro-environmental attitudes and behaviors: An international comparison. Human Ecology Review, 10(1), 23-31.
• Bhaskar, V., & Glyn, A. (1995). The north and the south: Ecological constraints and the global economy. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.
• Bissell, C. (2010, May). The social construction of educational technology through the use of proprietary software. Paper presented at the 7th international conference on networked learning, Aalborg, Denmark.
• Breschi, S., & Catalini, C. (2009). Tracing the links between science and technology: An exploratory analysis of scientists’ and inventors’ networks. Retrieved February 25, 2012, from http://centridiricerca.unicatt.it/scienze_cognitive_comunicazione_breschi.pdf
• Dale, A., & Newman, L. (2006). Sustainable development, education and literacy. International Journal of Sustainability for Higher Education, 6(4), 351-362.
• De Oliver, M. (1999). Attitudes and inaction: A case study of the manifest demographics of urban water conservation. Environment & Behavior, 31, 372-394.
• Dietz, S., & Neumayer, E. (2007). Weak and strong sustainability in the SEEA: Concepts and measurement. Ecological Economics, 61(4), 617-626.[WoS][Crossref]
• Dovros, N., & Makrakis, V. (2012). Transforming the classroom into a reflective community. A blended learning instructional approach. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 14(2), 72-86.
• Down, L. (2006). Addressing the challenges of mainstreaming education for sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainability for Higher Education, 7(4), 390-399.
• Dunlap, R. E. (1992). Trends in public opinion toward environmental issues: 1965-1990. In R. E. Dunlap & A. G. Mertig (Eds.), American environmentalism: The U.S. environmental movement, 1970-1990 (pp. 89-116). Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis.
• Dunlap, R. E. (1995). Public opinion and environmental policy. In J. P. Lester (Ed.), Environmental politics & Policy (2nd ed.) (pp. 63-114). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
• Dunlap, R. E., & Scarce, R. (1991). The polls-poll trends: Environmental problems and protection. Public Opinion Quarterly, 55, 651-672.[Crossref]
• ECLAC (Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean). (2000). Role of environmental awareness in achieving sustainable development. Retrieved December 5, 2011, from http://www.eclac.cl/publicaciones/xml/4/8824/lcr1961i.pdf Gooch, G. D. (1995). Environmental beliefs and attitudes in Sweden and the Baltic states. Environment and Behavior, 27(4), 513-539.
• Goodland, R., Daly, H. E., El Serafy, S., & von Droste, B. (1991). Environmentally sustainable economic development: Building on Brundtland. Paris: UNESCO.
• Grunwald, A. (2009). Technology assessment: Concepts and methods. In A. Meijers (Ed.), Philosophy of technology and engineering sciences (Vol. 9, pp. 1103-1146). Amsterdam: North Holland.
• Grunwald, A. (2012). Sustainability assessment of technologies - an integrative approach. Sustainable development - energy, engineering and technologies - manufacturing and environment. Retrieved December 10, 2012, from http://www.intechopen.com/books/sustainable-development-energy-engineering-and-technologiesmanufacturingand-environment/shaping-technologies-for-sustainable-development-an-integrativeapproachto-sustainability-assessmen
• Hassan, M. (2001). Transition to sustainability in the twenty-first century: The contribution of science and technology - report of the world conference of scientific academies held in Tokyo, Japan, 15-18 May 2000. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 2(1), 70-78.
• Hediger, W. (2004). Weak and strong sustainability, environmental conservation and economic growth. Retrieved March 10, 2011, from http://www.cer.ethz.ch/sured_2004/programme/sured_hediger.pdf
• Henze, C. (2000). Sustainability in teacher training courses in a sample of German universities. International Journal of Sustainability for Higher Education, 1(3), 280- 289.
• Holland, C., Mulcahy, C., Besong, F., & Judge, M. (2012). Ethical-values Pedagogical Model. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 14(2), 40-52.
• Huesemann, M. (2001). Can pollution problems be effectively solved by environmental science and technology? An analysis of critical limitations. Ecological Economics, 37(2), 271-287.[Crossref]
• Klein, H., & Kleinman, D. (2002). The social construction of technology: Structural considerations. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 27(1), 28-52.[Crossref][WoS]
• Kormos-Koch, K. (2007). Characteristics of environmentally conscious production behaviour in agricultural waste management. Studies in Agricultural Economics, 107, 97-108.
• Kostoulas-Makrakis, N. (2010). Developing and applying a critical and transformative model to address education for sustainable development in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 12(2), 17-26.
• Lederberg, J. (1997). Science and technology: Biology and bio-technology. Social Research, 64(3), 1157-1161.
• Lippert, I. (2004). An introduction to the criticism on sustainable development. Retrieved September 17, 2012, from http://www.erm.tucottbus.de~lippein/horizon/science/contents/working_papers/2004/critic.sustain
• Makrakis, V. (2006). Preparing United Arab Emirates teachers for building a sustainable society. University of Crete, Heraklion: E-media.
• Makrakis, V. (2010). The challenge of WikiQuESD as an environment for constructing knowledge in teaching and learning for sustainable development. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 1(1), 50-57.
• Makrakis, V. (2012, November). Exploring university students’ competence on learning to live together sustainably: An international survey research. Paper presented at the 16th UNESCO APEID international conference ìThe Heart of Education - Learning to Live Togetherî, Bangkok, Thailand.
• Makrakis, V., & Kostoulas-Makrakis, N. (2005). Techno-sciences and mathematics: Vehicles for a sustainable future and global understanding. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Hands on Science. HSci 2005 (pp. 103-108). University of Crete, Heraklion: E-media.
• Makrakis, V., Gkotzos, D., & Larios, N. (2012). ICT-enabled climate change education and children’s rights. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 14(2), 87-109.
• Makrakis, V., Larios, N., & Kaliantzi, G. (2012). ICT-enabled climate change education for sustainable development across the school curriculum. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 14(2), 53-71.
• Mass, A. (2006). The development of environmental consciousness and identity in surfing subculture. Independent study project (ISP) collection. Paper 328. Retrieved November 9, 2011, from http://digitalcollections.sit.edu/isp_collection/328
• Muffoletto, R. (1996). A discourse of benefit: Technology and school reform in the USA. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 5(1/2), 139-153.
• Nicolaides, A. (2006). The implementation of environmental management towards sustainable universities and education for sustainable development as an ethical imperative. International Journal of Sustainability for Higher Education, 7(4), 414-424.
• Nye, D. E. (1997). Shaping communication networks. Social Research, 64(3), 1067-1091.
• Posch, A., & Steiner, G. (2006). Integrating research and teaching on innovation for sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainability for Higher Education, 7(3), 276-292.
• Ryland, E. (2000). Gaia rising. Organization & Environment, 13(4), 381-402.
• Salazar, D. J., & Alper, D. K. (2002). Reconciling environmentalism and the left: Perspectives on democracy and social justice in British Columbia’s environmental movement. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 35(3), 527-566.
• Sánchez, M., & Lafuente, R. (2010). Defining and measuring environmental consciousness. Revista Internacional de Sociolog’a, 68(3), 731-755.
• Schultz, P. W. (2000). New environmental theories: Empathizing with nature: The effects of perspective taking on concern for environmental issues. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 391-406.[Crossref]
• Skogen, K., & Strandbu, Å. (2000). Environmentalism among Norwegian youth: Different paths to attitudes and action? Journal of Youth Studies, 3(2), 189-209.
• Vergragt, P. (2006). How technology could contribute to a sustainable world. GTI Paper Series No 8. Retrieved November 16, 2011, from http://www.gtinitiative.org/documents/PDFFINALS/8Technology.pdf
• WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development). (1997). Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Yamada, A. (2008). Environmental consciousness in Japan: From the “survey of attitudes toward the environment”. Retrieved January 25, 2012, from http://www.nhk.or.jp/bunken/english/reports/pdf/09_no7_08.pdf

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/v10230-012-0004-z