Rhythm and Vowel Quality in Accents of English

• Authors: Geoff Schwartz
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

In a sample of 27 speakers of Scottish Standard English two notoriously variable consonantal features are investigated: the contrast of /m/ and /w/ and non-prevocalic /r/, the latter both in terms of its presence or absence and the phonetic form it takes, if present. The pattern of realisation of non-prevocalic /r/ largely confirms previously reported findings. But there are a number of surprising results regarding the merger of /m/ and /w/ and the loss of non-prevocalic /r/: While the former is more likely to happen in younger speakers and females, the latter seems more likely in older speakers and males. This is suggestive of change in progress leading to a loss of the /m/ - /w/ contrast, while the variation found in non-prevocalic /r/ follows an almost inverse sociolinguistic pattern that does not suggest any such change and is additionally largely explicable in language-internal terms. One phenomenon requiring further investigation is the curious effect direct contact with Southern English accents seems to have on non-prevocalic /r/: innovation on the structural level (i.e. loss) and conservatism on the realisational level (i.e. increased incidence of [r] and [r]) appear to be conditioned by the same sociolinguistic factors.

Keywords

EN

phonology; rhythm; vowel quality; English pronunciation

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
• Journal: Research in Language
• Year: 2010
• Volume: 8
• Pages: 1-13

Dates

published

2010-09-30

online

2010-10-19

Contributors

author

Geoff Schwartz

• Adam Mickiewicz University

References

• Abercrombie, D. 1967. Elements of general phonetics, Chicago: Aldine.
• Bertinetto, P. 1989. Reflections on the dichotomy ‘stress’ vs. ‘syllable-timing’. Revue de Phonetique Appliquee, 91-93, 99-130.
• Boersma, P. and S. Hamann. 2009. Loanword adaptation as first-language phonological perception. In Calabrese, A. and W. L. Wetzels (eds.), Loanword phonology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.11-58.
• Dellwo, V. 2006. Rhythm and speech rate: A variation coefficient for delta C. Language and Language Processing: Proceedings of the 38th Linguistic Colloquium ed. by Pawel Karnowski & Imre Szigeti. 231-241. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
• Donegan, P. and D. Stampe. 1983. Rhythm and the holistic organization of language structure. In Papers from the Parasession on the Interplay of Phonology, Morphology, and Syntax. Chicago: CLS 19, 337-353.
• Hume, E., K. Johnson, M. Seo, G. Tserdanelis and S. Winters. 1999. A cross-linguistic study of stop place perception. In Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 2069-2072.
• Jenkins, J. 2000. The phonology of English as an international language. Oxford: OUP.
• Low, L. E.; E. Grabe and F. Nolan. 2000. Quantitative Characterizations of Speech Rhythm: Syllable-Timing in Singapore English, Language and Speech, 43(4), pp.377-401.
• Pike, K. L. 1945. The intonation of American English. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
• Ramus, F., M. Nespor and J. Mehler. 1999. Correlates of linguistic rhythm in the speech signal. Cognition 73, 265-292.[PubMed]
• Schwartz, G. 2007. Vowel quality and its holistic implications for phonology. Ms. Adam Mickiewicz University.
• Scott, S. 1993. P-centres in speech - an acoustic analysis. Ph.D. Dissertation, University College London.
• Strange, W. 1989. Evolving theories of vowel perception. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 85. 2081-2087.
• Strange, W., J. Jenkins and T. Johnson. 1983. Dynamic specification of coarticulated vowels. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 74, 695-705.
• Wagner, P. 2007. Visualising levels of rhythmic organization. Proceedings of ICPhS XVI. Saarbrucken.
• White, L. and S. L. Mattys. 2007. Rhythmic typology and variation in first and second languages. In Prieto, P., J. Mascaró and M.-J. Solé (eds.), Segmental and Prosodic issues in Romance Phonology. Current Issues in Linguistic Theory series (pp. 237-257). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
• Wright, R., S. Frisch and D. Pisoni. 1997. Speech Perception. Research on Spoken Language Processing, Progress Report No. 21. Indiana University.

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/v10015-010-0011-8