PL
Following presentation content synthetic model of rationality of theological argumentation demonstrating these factors which are important for acknowledging whether the argumentation is rational or not, or demonstrating the level of the concentration of rationality. The following paper doesn’t contain analyses concerning rationality of theology as a knowledge but it contains the factors which are important in estimating rationality of mental processes taking part in the process of theological argumentation from psychological point of view. The model concerns theological argumentation as a mental process (including process of reasoning, process of drawing inferences and other mental processes) which is taking part in a mind of theologian speculating on the truths which he/she believes in and which he/she deliberate. This paper shows at one hand a model which can be used by theologian to estimate the rationality of his/her process of theological argumentation and at the other hand a model which can be used by others trying to estimate the rationality of the theologian mental processes.
EN
Following presentation content synthetic model of rationality of theological argumentation demonstrating these factors which are important for acknowledging whether the argumentation is rational or not, or demonstrating the level of the concentration of rationality. The following paper doesn’t contain analyses concerning rationality of theology as a knowledge but it contains the factors which are important in estimating rationality of mental processes taking part in the process of theological argumentation from psychological point of view. The model concerns theological argumentation as a mental process (including process of reasoning, process of drawing inferences and other mental processes) which is taking part in a mind of theologian speculating on the truths which he/she believes in and which he/she deliberate. This paper shows at one hand a model which can be used by theologian to estimate the rationality of his/her process of theological argumentation and at the other hand a model which can be used by others trying to estimate the rationality of the theologian mental processes.