Prawo negacji negacji w dziejach refleksji nad językiem naturalnym

• Authors: Władysław Zabrocki

Title variants

EN

The law of double negation in the history of the research on natural languages

• Languages of publication: PL

Abstracts

PL

The paper deals with the philosophical assumptions of linguistic theories. It is concerned with three paradigms of linguistic thought (generativist, structuralist, and historical-comparative). Its main thesis is a proposal to treat the psychological approach assumed by generativists as a peculiar dialectical transformation of the psychological assumptions of the historical-comparative linguistics. 

EN

The paper deals with the philosophical assumptions of linguistic theories. It is concerned with three paradigms of linguistic thought (generativist, structuralist, and historical-comparative). Its main thesis is a proposal to treat the psychological approach assumed by generativists as a peculiar dialectical transformation of the psychological assumptions of the historical-comparative linguistics.

• Publisher: Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
• Journal: Investigationes Linguisticae
• Year: 2006
• Volume: 14
• Pages: 13-17

Dates

published

2007-06-16

Contributors

author

Władysław Zabrocki

• Department of Applied Logic, Adam Mickiewicz University

References

• Botha, K.P. 1981. The Conduct o f LinguisticInquiry. The Hague: Mouton.
• Chomsky, N. 1957. SyntacticStructures. The Hague: Mouton.
• Chomsky, N. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge Mass: MIT.
• Chomsky, N. 1966. Cartesian Linguistics. New York: Harper and Row Publishers.
• Chomsky, N. 1968. Language andMind. New York: Harcourt.
• Chomsky, N. 1970. Problems of explanation in linguistics. w: Explanation in the BehavioralScience. R. Borger and F. Cioffi (eds.), Cambridge 1970: Cambridge U. Press.
• Chomsky, N. 1973. Conditions on Transformations. w: Essays on Form andInterpretation, N. Chomsky, New York 1977: North-Holland.
• Chomsky, N. 1975. Reflections on Language. New York: Pantheon.
• Chomsky, N. 1975. The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory. New York: Plenum Press.
• Chomsky, N. 1976. On Wh-movement. w: FormalSyntax, P.W. Culicover, T Wasow, A. Akmajian (ed.), New York 1977: Academic Press.
• Chomsky, N. 1980. Rules andRepresentations. Oxford: Columbia U. Press.
• Chomsky, N. 1981. Principles and Parameters in Syntactic Theory. w: Explanation in Linguistics, N. Hornstein and D. Lightfoot (eds.), London, 1981: Longman.
• Chomsky, N. 1986. Knowledge o f Language: ItsNature, Origin andUse. New York: Prager.
• Chomsk, N. 2002. On Nature and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Deacon, T. W. 1997. The Symbolic Species: The Co-evolution o f Language and the Brain. NewYork: W.W.Norton.
• Hauser, M. D., Chomsky N., Fitch W. T. 2002. “The faculty of language: what is it, who is it, and how did it evolve?” Science 298, pp. 1569 - 1579.
• Jakobson, R. 1960. Poetyka w świetle językoznawstwa. Pamiętnik Literacki LI. Wrocław, pp. 431-474.
• Jakobson, R. 1962-67. Selected Writings. The Hague: Mouton.
• Jenkins, L. 2000. Biolinguistics. Exploring the Biology o f Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Katz, J. 1981. Language andOther Abstract Objects. Totowa: Rowman and Littlefield.
• Kirby, S. 1998. Function, Selection andInnateness: The Emergence o f Language Universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Kmita, J. 1978. O naukowo-teoretycznym ujęciu kultury symbolicznej. w: Zagadnienie przełomu antypozytywistycznego w humanistyce, Kmita J. (red.), Warszawa: PWN.
• Newmeyer, F. J. 1991. Functional Explanation in Linguistics and the Origins of Language. Language and Communication 11, pp. 3-28.
• Newmeyer, F. J. 2001. Where Is Functional Explanation? w: M. Andronis, C. Ball, H. Elston, and S. Neuvel (eds.), Proceedings from the Parasessions o f the Thirty-Seventh Meeting o f the Chicago Linguistic Society, vol. 37/2. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, pp. 99-122.
• Newmeyer, F. J. 2005. Possible andProbable Languages. A Generative Perspective on Linguistic Typology. Oxford: OUP.
• Pateman, T. 1985. From nativism to sociolinguistics: integrating a theory of language growth with a theory of speech practices. Journal of the Theory of SocialBehaviour 15, pp. 38-59.
• Paul, H. 1909. Prinzipien derSprachgeschichte. Halle: Max Niemeyer.
• Pinker, S. 1994. The Language Instinct: How the Mind Creates Language. New York: William Morrow.
• Pinker, S., Bloom, P. 1990. Natural language and natural selection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13, pp. 707-727, 765-784.
• Pinker, S., Jackendoff R. 2004. The faculty o f language: what’s special about it? Cognition, pp. 1 - 36.
• Saussure, F de. 1991. Kurs językoznawstwa ogólnego. Warszawa: PWN
• Zabrocki, W., Zabrocki T. 1991. Formal andfunctional explanationsfor interlingual differences. LinguaPosnaniensis 32/33, pp. 241-251.
• Zabrocki, W. 2006. Psychologizm i socjologizm w dziejach transformacyjno-generatywnej refleksji nadjęzykiem naturalnym. Stuttgart-Poznań: Ernst Klett Sprachen

Identifiers

DOI

10.14746/il.2006.14.3