Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2013 | 4 | 1 | 189-210

Article title

Physicians of the Body Versus Therapists of the Word: Reflections On Medicine and Sophistry

Authors

Content

Title variants

EN
Physicians of the Body Versus Therapists of the Word: Reflections On Medicine and Sophistry

Languages of publication

IT

Abstracts

IT
The aim of the present paper is to investigate the connection between ancient medicine and sophistry at the end of 5th century B.C. Beginning with analyses of some passages from the De vetere medicina (VM), De natura hominis (NH) and De arte, the article identifies many similarities between these treatises, on the one hand, and the sophistic doctrines, on the other: these concern primarily perceptual/intellectual knowledge and the interaction between reality, knowledge and language. Among the Sophists, Gorgias was particularly followed and imitated, as he was admired not only for his tremendous rhetorical skills, but also for his philosophically significant work On not being, which probably influenced various discussions in the Hippocratic treatises. However, if Gorgias argues in favor of language as dynastēs megas, the authors of VM, NH and De arte consider knowledge to be far more relevant and reliable than logos. These Hippocratic treatises criticize the philosophical thesis and the resulting kind of reductionism. Above all they defend the supremacy of medicine over any other art. By using the same argumentative and rhetorical strategies that were employed by Gorgias, these treatises reverse the thought of those Sophists who exalted only the technē tōn logōn.
EN
The aim of the present paper is to investigate the connection between ancient medicine and sophistry at the end of 5th century B.C. Beginning with analyses of some passages from the De vetere medicina (VM), De natura hominis (NH) and De arte, the article identifies many similarities between these treatises, on the one hand, and the sophistic doctrines, on the other: these concern primarily perceptual/intellectual knowledge and the interaction between reality, knowledge and language. Among the Sophists, Gorgias was particularly followed and imitated, as he was admired not only for his tremendous rhetorical skills, but also for his philosophically significant work On not being, which probably influenced various discussions in the Hippocratic treatises. However, if Gorgias argues in favor of language as dynastēs megas, the authors of VM, NH and De arte consider knowledge to be far more relevant and reliable than logos. These Hippocratic treatises criticize the philosophical thesis and the resulting kind of reductionism. Above all they defend the supremacy of medicine over any other art. By using the same argumentative and rhetorical strategies that were employed by Gorgias, these treatises reverse the thought of those Sophists who exalted only the technē tōn logōn.

Year

Volume

4

Issue

1

Pages

189-210

Physical description

Dates

published
2013-06-03

Contributors

author

References

  • Bignone, E., 1938, Studi sul pensiero antico, Napoli.
  • Blass, F., 1887, Die attische Beredsamkeit I: Von Gorgias bis zu Lysias, Leipzig [rist. New York 1979].
  • Bonazzi, M., 2010, I sofisti, Roma.
  • Capelle, W., 1912, Μετέωρος-μετεωρολογία, Philologus 71, pp. 414–448.
  • Diller, H., 1932, ΟΨΙΣ ΑΔΗΛΩΝ ΤΑ ΦΑΙΝΟΜΕΝΑ, Hermes 67, pp. 14–42.
  • Dupreel, E., 1948, Les Sophistes. Protagoras, Gorgias, Prodicus, Hippias, Neuchâtel.
  • Fabrini, P., Lami, A., 1979, “Il problema della lingua nello scritto ippocratico De Arte”, Rivista Critica di Storia della Filosofia 34, pp. 123–133.
  • Fantuzzi, M., 1983, “Varianza e tenacia del Polar Thinking nel De Prisca Medicina pseudoippocratico”, in F.
  • Lasserre et P. Mudry (éds.), Formes de Pensée dans la Collection Hippocratique, Genève, pp. 233–247.
  • Festugiere, A.-J., 1948 (intr., trad. et commentaire), Hippocrate, L’Ancienne Médecine, Paris.
  • Fränkel, H., 1925, “Xenophanesstudien”, Hermes 60, pp. 174–192 [rist. in H. Fränkel, Wege und Formen frühgriechischen
  • Denkens. Literarische und philosophiegeschichtliche Studien, München, 1955, pp. 335–349].
  • Fredrich, C., 1899, Hippokratische Untersuchungen, Berlin.
  • Gagarin, M., 1997 (ed.), Antiphon, The Speeches, Cambridge.
  • Gomperz, T., 1910, Die Apologie der Heilkunst, Leipzig [18901].
  • Gomperz, T., 1950, Pensatori greci. Storia della filosofia antica, vol. II, Firenze [ed. orig. Griechische Denker, Leipzig 1896].
  • Heiberg, I. L., 1927 (ed.), Hippocratis Indices librorum, Iusiurandum Lex, De arte, De medico, De decente habitu praeceptiones, De prisca medicina, De aere locis aquis, De alimento, De liquidorum usu, De flatibus, Leipzig (CMG I 1).
  • Heidel, W. A., 1981, Hippocratic Medicine, New York [19411].
  • Heinimann, F., 1961, “Eine vorplatonische Theorie der Technē”, Museum Helveticum 18, pp. 105–130.
  • Heinimann, F., 1965, Nomos und Physis. Herkunft und Bedeutung einer Antithese im griechischen Denken des 5. Jahrhunderts, Basel.
  • Ioli, R., 2004, “Cercatori nel tempo: Senofane B 18 DK”, Giornale Italiano di Filologia 56 (2), pp. 223–244.
  • Ioli, R., 2010 (testo greco, trad. e commento a cura di), Gorgia di Leontini, Su ciò che non è, Hildesheim/Zürich/ New York.
  • Ioli, R., 2013 (intr., trad. e commento a cura di), Gorgia di Leontini. Frammenti e Testimonianze, Roma.
  • Jones, W. H. S., 1923a, Hippocrates, Volume I, Cambridge Ma., London.
  • Jones, W. H. S., 1923b, Hippocrates, Volume II, Cambridge Ma., London.
  • Jones, W. H. S., 1931, Hippocrates, Volume IV, Cambridge Ma., London.
  • Jori, A., 1996, Medicina e medici nell’Antica Grecia. Saggio sul Perì Technes ippocratico, Napoli.
  • Jouanna, J., 1975 (texte établi et traduit), Hippocrate, La Nature de l’homme, Berlin (CMG I 1,3).
  • Jouanna, J., 1984, “Rhétorique et médecine dans la Collection hippocratique. Contribution à l’histoire de la rhétorique au Ve siècle”, Revue des études grecques 97, pp. 26–44.
  • Jouanna, J., 1988 (texte établi et traduit), Hippocrate, Des Vents. De l’Art, Paris.
  • Jouanna, J., 1990 (texte établi et traduit), Hippocrate, De l’ancienne médecine, Paris.
  • Jouanna, J., (1999), Hippocrates, Baltimore.
  • Kühner, R., Gerth, B., 1955, Ausführliche Grammatik der griechischen Sprache: Satzlehre, II, Leverkusen.
  • Laks, A., 2006, Introduction à la «philosophie présocratique», Paris.
  • Lami, A., 1977, “Un’eco di Gorgia in Antica Medicina”, Critica Storica 14, pp. 567–574.
  • Littre, É., 1839, Oeuvres complètes d’Hippocrate, vol. I, Paris.
  • Lloyd, G. E. R., 1963, “Who is attacked in On Ancient Medicine?”, Phronesis 8, pp. 108–126.
  • Lloyd, G. E. R., 1966, Polarity and Analogy: Two types of Argumentation in Early Greek Thought, Cambridge.
  • Longrigg, J., 1963, “Philosophy and Medicine: some early interactions”, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 67, pp. 147–175.
  • Morrison, J. S., 1963, “The Truth of Antiphon”, Phronesis 8, pp. 35–49.
  • Nutton, V., 2004, Ancient Medicine, London.
  • Pendrick, G.J., 2002 (ed.), Antiphon the Sophist, The Fragments, Cambridge.
  • Perilli, L., 1991, “Il lessico intellettuale di Ippocrate: σημαίνειν e τεκμαίρεσθαι”, Lexicon Philosophicum 5, pp. 153–180.
  • Perilli, L., 1994, “Il lessico intellettuale di Ippocrate. L’estrapolazione logica”, Aevum Antiquum VII, pp. 59–99.
  • Reiche, H. A. T., 1972, “Empirical Aspects of Xenophanes’ Theology”, in G.P. Anton, G.L. Kustas (eds.), Essays in Ancient Greek Philosophy, Albany, pp. 88–110.
  • Rivier, A., 1956, “Remarques sur les fragments 34 et 35 de Xénophane”, Revue de Philologie de Littérature et d’Histoire Anciennes 30 (1), pp. 37–61.
  • Sassi, M.M., 1987, “Platone, Fedone 108 D: Glauco, Protagora, il mito, Parola del Passato 42, pp. 27–34.
  • Sassi, M.M., 1997, “Sulla conoscibilità di Dio secondo Timeo”, in A. Fabris, G. Fioravanti, E. Morioni (a cura di), Logica e Teologia. Studi in onore di Vittorio Sainati, Pisa, pp. 229–234.
  • Sassi, M.M., 2011, “Senofane fra i sofisti. Dai limiti della conoscenza (21B34 DK) al paradosso eristico (Plat. Men. 80D5-E5)”, Méthexis 24, pp. 7–20.
  • Schiefsky, M.J., 2005 (ed.), Hippocrates On Ancient Medicine, Leiden-Boston.
  • Spatharas, D.G., 2007, “Gorgias and the author of the Hippocratic treatise De arte”, Classica et mediaevalia 58, pp. 159–163.
  • Tordesillas, A., 1986, “L’istance temporelle dans l’argumentation de la premiere et de la seconde sophistique: la notion de kairos”, in B. Cassin (éd.), Le plaisir de parler: Etudes de sophistique comparée, Paris, pp. 31–61.
  • Untersteiner, M., 1961 (ed., trad. e commento a cura di), Sofisti. Testimonianze e frammenti, vol. II: Gorgia, Licofrone e Prodico, Firenze.
  • Untersteiner, M., 1962 (ed., trad. e commento a cura di), Sofisti. Testimonianze e frammenti, vol. IV: Antifonte, Crizia, Firenze.
  • Untersteiner, M., 1996, I Sofisti, Milano. [19481]
  • Vegetti, M., 1963-4, “Technai e filosofia nel Peri technēs pseudo-ippocratico”, Atti della Accademia delle Scienze di Torino, Classe di scienze morali, storiche e filologiche 98, pp. 308–380.
  • Vegetti, M., 1965, Introduzione a Ippocrate, Opere, Torino, pp. 9–63.
  • Vegetti, M., 1998, “Empedocle ‘medico e sofista’ (Antica Medicina 20)”, in D. Nickel, K.-D. Fisher, P. Potter (eds.) Text and Tradition: studies in ancient medicine and its transmission presented to Jutta Kollesch, Leiden, pp. 289–995.
  • Velardi, R., 2001, “Il λογισμός di Gorgia”, in Id., Retorica, filosofia, letteratura. Saggi di storia della retorica greca su Gorgia, Platone e Anassimene di Lampsaco, Napoli, pp. 11–60.
  • Vickers, D. W., 1979, “The naive empiricism of On ancient medicine”, Apeiron 13, pp. 1–8.
  • Wesoly, M., 1983-4, “L’‘argomento proprio’ di Gorgia”, Annali dell’Istituto Italiano per gli Studi Storici 8, pp. 15–45.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_14746_pea_2013_1_9
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.