Sankcje Unii Europejskiej wobec Rosji: proces decyzyjny, trwałość i rola państw członkowskich

• Authors: Paulina Pospieszna

Title variants

EN

Sanctions of the European Union towards Russia: decision-making process, persistence and the role of the Member States

• Languages of publication: PL

Abstracts

PL

Celem przedstawionych badań jest analiza procesu decyzyjnego w UE w odniesieniu do nakładania i rozszerzania sankcji wobec Rosji oraz ocena przyczyny trwałości decyzji i porozumienia między państwami członkowskimi UE, pomimo odmiennego stanowiska. W szczególności artykuł analizuje proces decyzyjny, dynamikę oraz zmiany zachodzące w ramach grup roboczych Rady, takich jak COEST (Grupa Robocza ds. Europy Wschodniej i Azji Środkowej) dla Ukrainy, Białorusi oraz Rosji. Badania pokazują, że czynniki geopolityczne oraz ekonomiczne mają bardzo duże znaczenie w tworzeniu dynamiki, jaka zachodziła w grupach doradczych Rady Europejskiej, niemniej jednak pomimo tych różnic jednomyślność jest w dużej mierze wynikiem działań Francji i Niemiec.

EN

The aim of the presented research is to analyze the decision-making process in the EU with regard to imposing and extending sanctions against Russia and to assess the cause of the sutainability of decisions and agreements between EU Member States despite their different position towards sanctions. In particular, the article analyzes the decision-making process, dynamics and changes taking place within the Council’s working groups, such as COEST (Working Group on Eastern Europe and Central Asia) for Ukraine, Belarus and Russia. Research shows that geopolitical and economic factors are very important in creating dynamics that takes place in advisory groups of the European Council; nevertheless, despite these differences, unanimity is observed that is largely the result of the actions of France and Germany.

Keywords

PL

sankcje Unii Europejskiej; sankcje ekonomiczne; polityka zagraniczna UE; Rosja; proces decyzyjny UE

EN

sanctions of the European Union; economic sanctions; EU foreign policy; Russia; decision-making process of the European Union; sanctions of the European Union; economic sanctions; EU foreign policy; Russia; decision-making process of the European Union

• Publisher: Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
• Journal: Rocznik Integracji Europejskiej
• Year: 2018
• Issue: 12
• Pages: 311-321

Dates

published

2019-02-18

Contributors

author

Paulina Pospieszna

• Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza

References

• Allen S. H. (2005), The Determinants of Economic Sanctions Success and Failure, „International Interactions”, nr 31 (2), ss. 117-138.
• Art R. J., Cronin P. M. (2003), The United States and Coercive Diplomacy, The United States Institute for Peace, Washington.
• Askari H. G., Forrer J., Teegen H., Yang J. (2003), Economic Sanctions: Explaining their Philosophy and Efficacy, Praeger, Westport, CT.
• Cortright D., Lopez G. A. (2000). The Sanctions Decade: Assessing UN Strategies in the 1990s, Boulder, Lynne Rienner, Colorado.
• Drury A. C., Peterson T. (2011), Sanctioning Violence: The Effect of Third-Party Economic Coercion on Militarized Conflict, „Journal of Conflict Resolution”, nr 55 (4), ss. 580-605.
• Elliott K. A., Uimonen P. P. (1993), The Effectiveness of Economic Sanctions with Application to the Case of Iraq, „Japan and the World Economy”, nr 5 (4), ss. 403-409.
• Eriksson M. (2011), Targeting Peace: Understanding UN and EU Targeted Sanctions, Ashgate, Farnham.
• Escribà-Folch A. (2012), Authoritarian Responses to Foreign Pressure: Spending, Repression, and Sanctions, „Comparative Political Studies”, nr 45 (6), ss. 683-713.
• Escribà-Folch A., Wright J. (2010), Dealing with Tyranny: International Sanctions and the Survival of Authoritarian Rulers, „International Studies Quarterly”, nr 54 (2), ss. 335-359.
• Galtung J. (1967), On the Effects of International Economic Sanctions: With Examples from the Case of Rhodesia, „World Politics”, nr 19 (3), ss. 378-416.
• Giumelli F. (2011), Coercing, Constraining and Signalling: Explaining UN and EU Sanctions after the Cold War Francesco, ECPR Press, Colchester.
• Hufbauer G. C., Schott J. J., Elliott K. A., Oegg B. (2007), Economic Sanctions Reconsidered, Peterson Institute for International Economics, Washington, DC.
• Lindsay J. M. (1986), Trade Sanctions As Policy Instruments: A Re-Examination, „International Studies Quarterly”, nr 30 (2), ss. 153-173.
• Pape R. A. (1998), Why economic sanctions still do not work, „International Security”, nr 23 (1), ss. 66-77.
• Peksen D. (2009), Better or Worse? The Effect of Economic Sanctions on Human Rights, „Journal of Peace Research”, nr 46 (1), ss. 59-77.
• Peksen D., Drury A. C. (2010), Coercive or Corrosive: The Negative Impact of Economic Sanctions on Democracy, „International Interactions”, nr 36 (3), ss. 240-264.
• Portela C. (2012), European Union Sanctions and Foreign Policy: When and Why Do They Work?, Routledge, London.
• Pospieszna P., Weber P. (2017), Carrots or Sticks: The Choice and Impact of EU Democratic Sanctions and Aid, „V-Dem Working Paper”, https://www.v-dem.net/media/filer_public/d1/c6/d1c6216d-2205-475a-95a5-b97399dccb66Zusers_workmg_paper_10.pdf.
• Pospieszna P., Stępień B., Skrzypczyńska J. (2018), Russia’s Response to Western Sanctions: The Protectionist Strategy to Benefit Domestic Production and Consumption?, Prezentowany na konferencji International Trade and Finance Association (IT&FA) Conference 2017, UEP Poznań.
• Schneider G., Weber P. M. (2017), How Many Hands to Make Sanctions Work? Unilateral vs. Multilateral Economic Statecraft, Unpublished Working Paper.
• Stępień B., Pospieszna P., Skrzypczyńka J. (2016), Challenges in evaluating impact ofsanctions - political vs economic perspective, „Przegląd Politologiczny”, nr 4, ss. 155-168, DOI: 10.14746/pp.2016.21.4.12, http://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/pp/article/viewFile/7260/7277.
• Tostensen A., Bull B. (2002), Are Smart sanctions Feasible?, „World Politics”, nr 54 (3), ss. 373-403.

Identifiers

DOI

10.14746/rie.2018.12.21