Innovations and networking fostering tourist destination development in Slovakia

• Authors: Tomáš Gajdošík , Zuzanna Gajdošíková , Vanda Maráková , Kamila Borseková
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The paper focuses on the implementation of innovations and networking in the sector of tourism in two Slovak mountain destinations of international significance. The main objective of the paper is to identify and evaluate how innovations and networking contribute to tourist destination development in Slovakia. The implementation of institutional innovation resulted in the establishment of formal and informal networks. The developed networks consist of representatives of all sectors co-ordinating all relevant stakeholders. Formal and informal networks and the collaboration among stakeholders have launched other types of innovations in the tourism sector. The interactions and intensity of relations among stakeholders are analysed by network analysis. Destinations are compared with the network of the same size and density through quantitative network characteristics. Based on empirical research we investigate the impact of networks and innovations on tourist destination development. Due to the synergy effect of networking and implementation of multiple innovations, tourist destination development is observed.

Keywords

EN

destination management organisations; innovation; networking; spatial development; tourism; Slovakia

• Publisher: Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
• Journal: Quaestiones Geographicae
• Year: 2017
• Volume: 36
• Issue: 4

Dates

published

2017-12-15

Contributors

author

Tomáš Gajdošík

• Department of Tourism and Hospitality, Faculty of Economics, Matej Bel University in Banská Bystrica, Tajovského 10, 975 90 Banská Bystrica, Slovakia

author

Zuzanna Gajdošíková

• Department of Tourism and Hospitality, Faculty of Economics, Matej Bel University in Banská Bystrica, Tajovského 10, 975 90 Banská Bystrica, Slovakia

author

Vanda Maráková

• Department of Tourism and Hospitality, Faculty of Economics, Matej Bel University in Banská Bystrica, Tajovského 10, 975 90 Banská Bystrica, Slovakia

author

Kamila Borseková

• 2Research and Innovation Centre, Faculty of Economics, Matej Bel University in Banská Bystrica, Cesta na amfiteáter 1, 974 01 Banská Bystrica, Slovakia

References

• Baggio R., 2008. Network analysis of a tourism destination. Dissertation Thesis. The University of Queensland, Queensland.
• Baggio R., Scott N., Cooper C., 2010. Network science. A review focused on tourism. Annals of Tourism Research 37(3): 802–827.
• Beni M., 2003. Globalizaçâo do Turismo; Megaicndências do Sector e a Realidade Brasileira. Editora Aleph, Sao Paulo.
• Beritelli P., Strobl A., Peters M., 2013. Interlocking directorships against community closure: A trade-off for development in tourist destinations. Tourism Review 68(1): 21–33.
• Bieger T., Beritelli P., 2012. Management von Destinationen. Oldenbourg, München.
• Borgatti S.P., Everett M.G., Freeman L.C., 2002. Ucinet for Windows: Software for social network analysis. Analytic Technologies, Harvard, MA.
• Borseková K., Vaňová A., Vitálišová K., 2017. Smart specialization for smart spatial development: Innovative strategies for building competitive advantages in tourism in Slovakia. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 58(2): 39–50.
• Britton S., 1991. Tourism, capital, and place: Towards a critical geography of tourism. Environ Plan D Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 9(4): 452–475.
• Butler R.W., 1980. The concept of a tourism area cycle of evolution: Implication for management of resources. The Canadian Geographer 24(1): 5–12.
• Camisón C., Monformt-Mir V.M., 2012. Measuring innovation in tourism from the Schumpeterian and the dynamic-capabilities perspectives. Tourism Management 33(4): 776–789.
• Capone F., 2004. Regional competitiveness in tourism local systems. 44th European congress of the ERSA. Regions and fiscal federalism, Universidad de Porto.
• Castellaci F., 2008. Innovation and the competitiveness of industries: Comparing the mainstream and the evolutionary approaches. Journal of Technological Forecasting & Social Change 75(7): 984–1006.
• Del Chiappa G., Presenza A., 2013. The use of network analysis to assess relationships among stakeholders within a tourism destination. An empirical investigation on costa Smeralda-Gallura (Italy). Tourism Analysis 18(1): 1–13.
• Fernández-Cavia J., Rovira C., Díaz-Luque P., Cavaller V., 2014. Web Quality Index (WQI) for official tourist destination websites. Proposal for an assessment system. Tourism Management Perspectives 9(1): 5–13.
• Flagestad A., Hope C.A., 2001. Strategic success in winter sports destinations: A sustainable value creation perspective. Tourism Management 22(5): 445–461.
• Freeman R.E., 1984. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman, Boston, MA.
• Grama C., Baggio R., 2014. A network analysis of Sibiu County, Romania. Annals of Tourism Research 47(2): 77–95.
• Gray B., 1989. Collaborating: Finding common ground for multiparty problems. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
• Hall C.M., 1999. Rethinking collaboration and partnership: A public policy perspective. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 7(3–4): 274–289.
• Hall C.M., Williams A.M., 2008. Tourism and innovation. Routledge, London.
• Hankinton G., 2004. Relational network brands: Towards a conceptual model of place brands. Journal of Vacation Marketing 10(2): 109–121.
• Hanneman A., Riddle M., 2005. Introduction to social network methods. University of California, Riverside, CA.
• Hjalager A., 2002. Repairing innovation defectiveness in tourism. Tourism Management 23(5): 465–474.
• Hjalager A., 2010. A review of innovation research in tourism. Tourism Management 31(1): 1–12.
• Hjalager A., Flagestad A., 2012. Innovations in well-being tourism in the Nordic countries. Current Issues in Tourism 15(8): 725–740.
• Jafari J. et al., 2003. Encyclopedia of tourism. Routledge, London.
• Jamal T.B., Getz D., 1995. Collaboration theory and community tourism planning. Annals of Tourism Research 22(1): 186–204.
• Kidová A., 2017. Map of destination management organisations in Slovakia. Geographical institute of Slovak academy of Sciences, Bratislava.
• Kučerová J., 2015. Plánovanie a politika v cieľových miestach cestovného ruchu (Planning and policy in tourist destinations). Belianum, Banská Bystrica.
• Lynch P., Morrison A., 2007. The role of networks. In: Michael E. (ed.), Micro clusters and networks: The growth of tourism. Elsevier, Oxford: 43–62.
• Mayer M., 2009. Innovation as a success factor in tourism: Empirical evidence from western Austrian cable-car companies. Erdkunde 63(2): 123–139.
• Navrátil J., Pícha K., Martinát S., Knotek J., Kučera T., Balounová Z., Gilliam V., Švec R., Rajchard J., 2013. A model for the identification of areas favourable for the development of tourism: A case study of the Šumava mts. and South Bohemia tourist regions. Moravian Geographical Reports 21(1): 25–39.
• Novelli M., Schmitz, B., Spencer, T., 2006. Networks, clusters and innovation in tourism: A UK experience. Tourism Management 27(6): 1141–1152.
• O’Sullivan D., 2014. Spatial network analysis. In: Handbook of Regional Science. Springer, London: 1253–1273.
• OECD 2004. A conceptual and dynamic approach to innovation in tourism – OECD. Retrieved February 18, 2016 from http://www.oecd.org/cfe/tourism/34267921.pdf.
• Oslo manual: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data 2005. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris.
• Ottenbacher M., Gnoth J., 2005. How to develop successful hospitality innovation. Cornell Hotels and Restaurant Administration Quarterly 46(2): 205–222.
• Pechlaner et al., 2012. Destination management organizations as interface between destination governance and corporate governance. Anatolia 23(2): 151–168.
• Porter M.E., 1998. Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review 76(6): 77–90.
• Presenza A., Cipollina M., 2010. Analysing tourism stakeholders’ networks. Tourism Review 65(4): 17–30.
• Racherla P., Hu C., Hyun M.Y., 2008. Exploring the role of innovative technologies in building a knowledge-based destination. Current Issues in Tourism 11(5): 407–428.
• Rodrigues A.B., 2001. Turismo rural. Contexto, São Paulo.
• Romão J., Guerreiro J., Rodrigues P., 2013. Regional tourism development: Culture, nature, life cycle and attractiveness. Current Issues in Tourism 16(6): 517–534.
• Scott J., Carrington P.J., 2011. The SAGE handbook of social network analysis. Sage, London.
• Scott N., Baggio R., Cooper Ch., 2008. Network analysis and tourism: From theory to practice. Cromwell Press Ltd., Clevedon.
• Sheehan L.R., Ritchie J.B., 2005. Destination stakeholders exploring identity and salience. Annals of Tourism Research 32(3): 711–734.
• Soteriades M., 2012. Tourism destination marketing: Approaches improving effectiveness and efficiency. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology 3(2): 107–120.
• UNWTO 2007. A practical guide to tourism destination management. World Tourism Organization, Madrid.
• UNWTO 2010. Survey on destination governance: Evaluation report. World Tourism Organization, Madrid.
• van der Zee E., Vanneste D., 2015. Tourism networks unravelled; a review of literature on networks in tourism management studies. Tourism Management Perspectives 15(2): 46–56.
• Wang Y., Krakover S., 2008. Destination marketing: Competition, cooperation or coopetition? International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management 20(2): 126–141.
• Wasserman S., Faust K., 1994. Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
• World Travel and Tourism Council, 2016. Travel & Tourism. Economic Impact 2016. Slovakia.

Identifiers

DOI

10.1515/quageo-2017-0039