Psychological determinants of the individual’s propensity to manipulate in interpersonal interactions

• Authors: Nataliya Grebin
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The article presents results of  research on individuals with different levels of propensity to manipulate in interpersonal interactions. The objective of this empirical research is to determine psychological peculiarities of individuals with propensities to manipulate and also to determine psychological factors of the personal propensity to manipulate. Key variables of our research are propensity to manipulate (dependent variable) and a range of psychological parameters that describe personal, individual and topological, motivational, value- and orientational, sense and existential fields of personality as well as peculiarities of their manifestation in interpersonal interaction (independent variables)

Keywords

EN

manipulation, propensity to manipulate, Machiavellianism, psychological determinants

• Publisher: Fundacja Pro Scientia Publica
• Journal: Journal of Education Culture and Society
• Year: 2015
• Volume: 6
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 108-119

Dates

published

2020-01-03

Contributors

author

Nataliya Grebin

• Faculty of Philosophy, Ivan Franko National University of L’viv, Universitets’ka str., 1, L’viv 79000, Ukraine

References

• Ames, M., & Kidd, A.H. (1979). Machiavellanism and womans grave point averages. Psychological Reports, 4(1), 223-228.
• Barrett, L., & Henzi, P. (2005.) The social nature of primate cognition. Biological Sci., 272 (1575), 1865-1875.
• Byrne, R., & Whitten, A. (1997). (eds.). Machiavellian intelligence II: Extensions and evaluations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Christie, R., & Geis, F. (1970). Studies in machiavellianism. N. Y.: Academic Press.
• Deluga, R. J. (2001). American presidential Machiavellianism: Implications for charismatic leadership and rated performance. The Leadership Quart, 12(3), 339-363.
• Geis, F., & Moon, T. (1981). Machiavellianism and deception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41 (4), 766-775.
• Hawley, P. H. (2006). Evolution and personality: a new look at Machiavellianism. In: D. Mroczek, & T. Little, (eds.). Handbook of personality development. Mahwah (pp.147-161). NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Karakulova, О. (2008). Личностная обусловленность к манипулированию окружающими людьми в юношеском возрасте [Personal Dependence on Manipulating Other People in Adolescence]. Abstract of PhD thesis in Psychology. 19.00.13. Tomsk: Tomsk State University.
• Karakulova, О. (2009). Склонность к манипулированию окружающими людьми в юношеском возрасте в контексте проблемы формирования ригидного типа личности [Propensity to Manipulate Others in Adolescence in the Context of the Problem of Rigid Personality Formation], Вестник Томского гос. Университета, 320, 183 -186.
• Larina, А. (2010). Подходы, установки и перспективы в исследовании макиавеллизма [Approaches, Mindsets and Prospects in Machiavellianism Research]. Вопросы психологии, 3, 75-83.
• Machiavelli, N. (1998). Избранные сочинения [Selected Works]. Rostov-on Don: Феникс.
• McCann, S. J. (1992). Alternative formulas to predict the greatness of U. S. presidents: Personological, situational, and Zeitgeist factors. Journal of Personality and Social Psycholog., 62, 469-479.
• McHoskey, J., Worsel, W., & Szyatro, C. (1998). Machiavellianism and psychopathy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(1), 192-210.
• Prigozhyn, А. (2010). Цели и ценности. Новые методы работы с будущим [Aims and Values. New Methods of Working with the Future]. Мoscow: Дело.
• Ruslina, А. (2007). Сравнительный анализ понятий «макиавеллизм» и «стратагемность» и их использование в психологической литературе [Comparative Analysis of the Notions «Machiavellianism» and «Stratagemity» and their Use in Psychological Literature]. Психологические исследования, 2, 194-205.
• Shcheglova, E. (2009) Склонность к манипулированию и формы ее проявления в профессионально-педагогической деятельности [Propensity to Manipulate and Forms of its Manifestation in Professional and Pedagogical Activity]: Abstract of PhD thesis in Psychology. 19.00.13. Tomsk: Tomsk State University.
• Sheinov, V. (2012). Макиавеллизм личности: кто умело манипулирует людьми [Machiavellianism of a Personality: Who is Good at Manipulating People]. Minsk: Харвест.
• Schepers, D. H. (2003). Machiavellianism, profit, and the dimensions of ethical judgement: A study of impact, Journal of Business Ethics, 42, 339–352.
• Shostrom, E. L. (1994). Анти – Карнеги, или Человек – манипулятор [Ant -Carnegie, or Man the Manipulator]. Moscow: Дубль-В, Дельта-92.
• Skinner, N.F. (1983). Personality correlates of Machiavellianism, extraversion and toughmindness in business. Social Behavior and Personality, An International Journal, 11(1), 29–33.
• Sokolova, Е., & Ivanishchuk, G. (2013) Мотивационные источники и регуляторне функции манипуляции [Motivational Sources and Regulatory Functions of Manipulation], Вопросы психологии, 4, 87-101.
• Voyevodin, А. (2002). Стратагемы стратегии войны, манипуляции, обмана [Stratagemas of the Strategy of War, Manipulation, Deceit]. Moscow: Белые Альвы.
• Wilson, D.S. Near, D., & Miller, R.R. (1996). Machiavellianism: A synthesis of the evolutionary and psychological literatures. Psychological Bulletin, 119 (2). 285-299.
• Znakov, V. (2000). Machiavellianism: Psychological Feature of a Personality and Methods of its Research, Psychological Journal, 5. 16-22.

Identifiers

DOI

10.15503/jecs20151.108.119