Writing what is told

• Authors: Anna Gańko
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Aim. The aim of this paper is to depict difficulties in presenting ethnographically collected narratives - recorded and transcripted – as written texts. Multifaceted fieldwork experience when translated into form required in academic work is unavoidably reduced. It losts variety of aspects impossible to express just by written language required by academic discourse. Simultaneously written language is influencing and shaping pre-textual fieldwork experience. Method. The study is a theoretical afterthought based on the fieldwork experience gained during research concerning modes of constructing reminiscent narratives in one of lower-silesian villages in years 2013-2016.   Resullt and Conclusions. The analysis shows indispensable impact of medium of written language of process of gaining and presenting ethnographical knowledge. It presents its influence and limitations in the process of building fieldwork experience.

Keywords

EN

ethnography, pretextual, text, knowledge, fieldwork, experience

• Publisher: Fundacja Pro Scientia Publica
• Journal: Journal of Education Culture and Society
• Year: 2018
• Volume: 9
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 229-237

Dates

published

2018-09-05

Contributors

author

Anna Gańko

• Institute of Polish Culture, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8664-455X

References

• REFERENCES
• . Amit, V. (2000). Introduction: Constructing the Field. In: V. Amit (ed.), Constructing the Field: Ethnographic Fieldwork in the Contemporary World. London: Routledge.
• . Bachtin, M. (1986). Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Austin Tx: University of Texas Press.
• . Berne, E. (1964). Games people play. The psychology of Human Relationships. New York: Grove Press.
• . Clifford, J., & Marcus, G. (1986). Writing culture. The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley-Los Angeles-London: University of California Press.
• . Godlewski, G. (2016). Luneta i radar. Szkice z antropologicznej teorii kultury [Telescope and radar. Studies of anthropological theory of culture]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo UW.
• . Godlewski, G. (2018). Poza nachylenie tekstowe, w stronę doświadczenia przedtekstowego. Wskazówki terapeutyczne [Beyond the Textual Bias, Towards Pretextual Experience: Therapeutic Guidelines]. Teksty drugie 2018 (1), 61-78.
• . Goody, J. (2010). Myth, Ritual and the Oral. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• . Hammersley, M., & Atkinson P. (2005). Ethnography. Principles in practice. New York: Routledge.
• . Kant, I. (1914). Critique of Judgment. London: Macmillan.
• . Latour, B. (2007). Reassembling the Social - An Introduction to Actot-Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• . Rakowski, T. (2018). Etnografia przedtekstowa. Fenomenologiczne korzenie interpretacji antropologicznej [Pretextual Ethnography: The Phenomenological Roots of Anthropological Interpretation]. Teksty drugie 2018 (1), 16-39.
• . Rakowski, T. (2016). Hunters, Gatherers, and Practiotioners of Powerlessness. An Ethnography of the Degraded in Postsocialist Poland. Oxford: Berghahn Books.
• . Samudra, J. K. (2008). Memory in our Body: Thick Participation and the translation of Kinestetic Experience. American Ethnologist, 35 (4), 665-681.
• . Welzer, H. (2009) Materiał, z którego zbudowane są biografie [Material that biographies are composed with] In: M. Saryusz-Wolska (ed.) Pamięć zbiorowa i kulturowa. Współczesna perspektywa niemiecka. Kraków: Universitas.

Identifiers

DOI

10.15503/jecs20182.229.237