Activities of organizations located in Poland in the field of sustainable development

• Authors: Dawid Szostek
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Theoretical background: The article discusses the activities of organizations located in Poland in the field of sustainable development (SD). This is a specific development, which considers the needs of future generations. These activities may concern environmental, social or economic issues. The identified knowledge gap refers to the type of the most common SD-activities, possible partners in such projects, employee involvement and motivation to participate in such activities, and the perceived advantages and negative aspects of SD-projects.Purpose of the article: The purpose of the article is to evaluate the activities of organizations located in Poland in the field of sustainable development. The described issues include: the type of the most common SD-activities, possible partners in such projects, employee involvement and motivation to participate in such activities, and the perceived advantages and negative aspects of SD-projects.Research methods: The empirical material was obtained from 13 individual in-depth interviews conducted by telephone in 2018.Main findings: The analysed organizations implemented mainly social, but also ecological projects. By the implementation of projects, they cooperated mainly with NGO-partners, but only if it was necessary (e.g. if the NGO had more knowledge and experience in a specific field). Most of the projects were based on the active participation of employees in the form of volunteering; such projects had the most positive effects for the project’s goals, but also for the employees and the company. Hence, companies willingly motivated employees to participate in such projects not only by informational and organizational support, but also through various methods of distinguishing employees (e.g. volunteering gala, cup of coffee with the CEO). Companies see considerable benefits in such projects for themselves and for the staff. The perceived disadvantages are few, and in any case they can be minimized and are fully discounted by the potential benefits.

Keywords

EN

sustainable development; sustainable management

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej
• Journal: Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, sectio H – Oeconomia
• Year: 2019
• Volume: 53
• Issue: 1

Dates

published

2019

online

2019-10-14

Contributors

author

Dawid Szostek

References

• Brundtland, G.H. (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future, http://www.un-documents.net/our-common-future.pdf [access: 04.04.2017].
• Carter, C.R., & Rogers, D.S. (2008). A framework of sustainable supply chain management: moving towards new theory. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 38(5). https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030810882816.
• Cirnu, C.E., & Kuralt B. (2013). The impact of employees’ personal values on their attitudes toward sustainable development: cases of Slovenia and Romania. Management: Journal of Contemporary Management Issues, 18(2).
• Florida, R. (1996). Lean and Green: The Move to Environmentally Conscious Manufacturing. California Management Review, 39(1). https://doi.org/10.2307/41165877.
• Galpin, T., Whittington, J.L., Bell G. (2015). Is your sustainability strategy sustainable? Creating a culture of sustainability. Corporate Governance, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-01-2013-0004.
• Godkin, L. (2015). Mid-Management, Employee Engagement, and the Generation of Reliable Sustainable Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2149-0.
• Ji, L., Huang, J., Liuc, Z., Zhua, H., Caia, Z. (2012). The effects of employee training on the relationship between environmental attitude and firms’ performance in sustainable development. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(14). https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2011.637072.
• Kumar, D., & Rahman, Z. (2015). Sustainability adoption through buyer supplier relationship across supply chain: A literature review and conceptual framework. International Strategic Management Review, 3(1-2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ism.2015.04.002.
• Liu, Z., Li J., Zhu, H., Cai, Z., & Wang, l. (2014). Chinese fims’ sustainable development – the role of future orientation, environmental commitment, and employee training. Asia Pacifi Journal of Management, 31. DOI: 10.1007/s10490-012-9291-y
• Polman, P., & Bhattacharya, C. (2016). Engaging Employees to Create a Sustainable Business. Stanford Social Innovation Review, Fall.
• Seuring, S., & Müller, M. (2008). From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.020.
• Szołtysek, J. (2009). Logistyka zwrotna. Poznań: Instytut logistyki i Magazynowania.
• Temminck, E., Mearns, K., Fruhen, L. (2015). Motivating Employees towards Sustainable Behaviour. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(6). https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1827.
• Verhulst, E., & Boks, C. (2014). Employee Empowerment for Sustainable Design. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 55. https://doi.org/10.9774/GLEAF.4700.2014.se.00008.
• Wolf, J. (2013). Improving the Sustainable Development of Firms: The Role of Employees. Business Strategy and the Environment, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1731.
• Wu, Z., & Pagell, M. (2011). Balancing priorities: Decision-making in sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Operations Management, 29(6). https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jom.2010.10.001.

Identifiers

DOI

10.17951/h.2019.53.1.99-109