Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2017 | 2 |

Article title

“May the Odds be Ever in Your Favor” Dystopian Reality in Suzanne Collins’ The Hunger Games Trilogy

Authors

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

EN
The research paper focuses on the dystopian reality depicted in Suzanne Collins’s the Hunger Games trilogy. I shall primarily discuss the social and political relations established in the post-apocalyptic country – Panem, and how they affect the quotidian life. Crucial here is the clash between two realms comprising the world represented in the novels – dystopian districts and the seemingly utopian Capitol. The juxtaposition of two completely different ‘constituents’ of the country shapes the mutual relations between the Panem inhabitants – these within the districts, amongst them and between the center and the peripheries. The Hunger Games (2008), Catching Fire (2009) and Mockingjay (2010) consecutively portray the history of dystopian civilization from the entropic reality succeeding after the Dark Days, through a coincidental chain of events initiated during the 74th Hunger Games, to the ultimate armed conflict bringing hope and the promise of a new beginning. Pivotal in the oppressive world is the concept of the savior in the person of Katniss Everdeen who, initially unconsciously and unintentionally, contributes to igniting the final revolt against the dictatorial regime of President Snow. The aim of the paper is to analyze how the author represents the realm of Panem with regard to the complex relations between the center and the periphery. 

Year

Issue

2

Physical description

Dates

published
2017
online
2017-08-17

Contributors

author
  • Maria Curie-Skłodowska University (UMCS) in Lublin
editor
editor
editor
editor
editor
editor

References

  • Claeys, Gregory. 2010. “The Origins of Dystopia: Wells, Huxley and Orwell”. In The Cambridge Companion to Utopian Literature. New York: Cambridge University Press. 107–134.
  • Collins, Suzanne. 2009. The Hunger Games. New York: Scholastic Inc.
  • Collins, Suzanne. 2013. Catching Fire. New York: Scholastic Inc.
  • Collins, Suzanne. 2014. Mockingjay. New York: Scholastic Inc.
  • Foy, Joseph J. 2012. ““SAFE TO DO WHAT?” Morality and the War of All against All in the Arena”. In Dunn, George, A., Nicolas Michaud, William Irwin. The Hunger Games and Philosophy: A Critique of Pure Treason. USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 206–221.
  • Garriott, Deidre, Whitney Jones, and Julie Tyler. 2014. Space and Place in the Hunger Games: New Readings of the Novels. Jefferson, North Carolina: McFarland & Company, Inc.
  • Henthorne, Tom. 2012. Approaching the Hunger Games Trilogy: A Literary and Cultural Analysis.
  • Jefferson, North Carolina: McFarland & Company, Inc.
  • Hornby, Albert S. Oxford Advanced Learners’ Dictionary of Contemporary English. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, 2010.
  • Lotman, Yuri. 2001. Universe of the Mind: A Semiotic Theory of Culture. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  • Martin, Bruce. 2014. “Political Muttations. “Real or Nor Real?””. In Space and Place in the Hunger Games: New Readings of the Novels. Jefferson, North Carolina: McFarland & Company, Inc. 220–242.
  • Nöth, Winfried. 2015. “The topography of Yuri Lotman’s semiosphere”. International Journal of Cultural Studies, Vol. 18(1). 11 –26.
  • Olthouse, Jill. 2012. ““I WILL BE YOUR MOCKINGJAY” The Power and Paradox of Metaphor in the Hunger Games Trilogy”. In Dunn, George, A., Nicolas Michaud, William Irwin. The Hunger Games and Philosophy: A Critique of Pure Treason. USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 41–54.
  • Sargent, Lyman Tower. 1994. “The Three Faces of Utopianism Revisited”. In Utopian Studies, vol. 5, no. 1, 1994, pp. 1–37. www.jstor.org/stable/20719246.
  • Van Dyke, Christina. 2012. “Discipline and the Docile Body: Regulating Hungers in the Capitol”. In Dunn, George, A., Nicolas Michaud, William Irwin. The Hunger Games and Philosophy: A Critique of Pure Treason. USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 250–264.
  • Vieira, Fátima. 2010. “The concept of utopia”. In Claeys, Gregory. The Cambridge Companion to Utopian Literature. New York: Cambridge University Press. 3–27.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_17951_nh_2017_2_49
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.