Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2019 | 71 | 13-30

Article title

New ways towards a service-oriented, participatory child protection in Hungary

Authors

Content

Title variants

Nowe formy zorientowanej na usługi, partycypacyjnej ochrony dzieci na Węgrzech

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

EN
The core aspect of the child welfare and protection thought focusing on the family and channelling community resources is that in order to preserve the unity of the family, it is necessary to widely introduce from the local community the services into the family’s life, thus mobilizing the internal resources of the family, and acknowledging parenting, as a social value. Integrative child protection is a multidisciplinary and multidimensional process. The research examines how the Hungarian child protection professionals in child welfare services and centres, child protection institutions and foster care system reflect on the professional work, and on the dysfunctions identified in child protection field work. I also examine how social work training and practice can help to incorporate professional values into field work. I analyse how social assistance can be adequate in general, and how social work became asocial in the late modernity and in a rapidly changing, unpredictable service environment.
PL
Podstawowym aspektem dobrostanu i ochrony dzieci, który skupia się na rodzinie i ukierunkowaniu zasobów społeczności, jest to, że w celu zachowania jedności rodziny konieczne jest powszechne wprowadzenie ze społeczności lokalnej usług w życie rodziny, mobilizując w ten sposób wewnętrzne zasoby rodziny i uznając rodzicielstwo za wartość społeczną. Integracyjna ochrona dzieci jest procesem wielodyscyplinarnym i wielowymiarowym. W badaniach przeanalizowano, w jaki sposób węgierscy specjaliści w dziedzinie ochrony dzieci w ośrodkach opieki i opieki nad dziećmi, instytucje ochrony dzieci i system pomocy zastępczej myślą o swoje pracy oraz jakie dysfunkcje identyfikowane są przez nich w obszarze ich pracy dotyczącej ochrony dzieci. Badano również, w jaki sposób szkolenia i praktyka społeczna mogą przyczynić się do włączenia wartości zawodowych do pracy w terenie. Analizowano, w jaki sposób pomoc społeczna może być w ogólnym sensie odpowiadająca na oczekiwania i jak praca społeczna stała się aspołeczna w późnej nowoczesności i w szybko zmieniającym się, nieprzewidywalnym środowisku usług.

Year

Issue

71

Pages

13-30

Physical description

Dates

published
2019-12-30

Contributors

author

References

  • Adfam (2011), A Partnership Approach, retrieved from: www.adfam.org.uk (accessed 26.07.2017).
  • Balogh K., Gregorits P., Rácz A. (2018), The Situation of the Child Welfare System in Hungary, MIRDEC – 10th International Academic Conference, Global and Contemporary Trends in Social Science (Global Meeting of Social Science Community) Conference Proceedings, MIRDEC Publishing, Barcelona.
  • Banwell C., Denton B., Bammer G. (2002), Programmes for the Children of Illicit Drug-Using Parents: Issues and Dilemmas, “Drug and Alcohol Review”, no. 21(4).
  • C4EO (2009), Effective Interventions for Complex Families Where There Are Concerns about, or Evidence of, a Child Suffering Significant Harm, Centre for Excellence and Outcomes in Children and Young People’s Services, London.
  • Child Welfare Information Gateway (2016), Family Engagement: Partnering with Families to Improve Child Welfare Outcomes, retrieved from: https://www.childwelfare.gov/pubs/f-famengagement/ (accessed 24.07.2017).
  • Copello A.G., Velleman R.D., Templeton L.J., (2005), Family interventions in the treatment of alcohol and drug problems, “Drug Alcohol Review”, no. 24(4).
  • Czinderi K., Homoki A., Rácz A. (2018), Parental Quality and Child Resilience: Experience of a Hungarian Model Program, MIRDEC – 10th International Academic Conference, Global and Contemporary Trends in Social Science (Global Meeting of Social Science Community) Conference Proceedings, MIRDEC Publishing, Barcelona.
  • Ddumba-Nyanzi I., Li M. (2018), Assessing Alternativ Care for Children in Uganda, Measure Evaluation, Uganda Country Core Team, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, retrieved from: https://bettercarenetwork.org/sites/default/files/Armenia%20Assessment%20Report-en.pdf (accessed 9.02.2019).
  • Easton C., Featherstone G., Poet H., Aston H., Gee G., Durbin B. (2012), Supporting Families with Complex Needs, Findings from LARC4 – Report for the Local Authority Research Consortium (LARC), National Foundation for Educational Research, Berkshire.
  • Horgan J. (2011), Parental Substance Misuse: Addressing its Impact on Children, A Review of the Literature, National Advisory Committee on Drugs, Dublin.
  • Kroll B., Taylor A. (2009), Interventions for Children and Families Where There Is Parental Drug Misuse, retrieved from: http://dmri.lshtm.ac.uk/docs/kroll.pdf (accessed 26.07.2017).
  • KSH (2017), Data collection: No. 1208, No. 1209, No. 1210, No. 1696, No. 2023, KSH, Budapest, (unpublished data).
  • McCroskey J., Meezan W. (1998), Family-Centered Services: Approaches and Effectiveness, “The Future of Children”, vol. 8, no. 1.
  • Newcastle City Council (2002), Parental Substance Misuse and the Effects on Children, Practice Guidance for Agencies in Contact with Children and Young People, Newcastle City Council, Newcastle.
  • Rácz A. (2012), Barkácsolt életutak, szekvenciális (rendszer)igények, [Self-made Life-paths, Sequential (System) Needs], L’Harmattan, Budapest.
  • Rácz A. (2015), Social Exclusion in Hungary from a Child Protection Perspective, “International Journal of Child, Youth and Family Studies”, vol. 6, no. 3, retrieved from: https://journals.uvic.ca/index.php/ijcyfs/article/view/13565 (accessed 9.02.2019).
  • Rácz A. (2016), Gyermekvédelem mint fragmentált társadalmi intézmény, (Child Protection as a Fragmented Social Institution), Debreceni Egyetemi Kiadó, Debrecen.
  • Ross N., Cocks J., Johnston L., Stoker L. (2017), ‘No Voice, No Opinion, Nothing’: Parent Experiences When Children Are Removed and Placed in Care. – Research report, NSW: University of Newcastle, Newcastle.
  • Szilvási L. (2005), Családok a gyermekvédelem határán: Integrációt erősítő és dezintegráló beavatkozások a szociális intézményekben, (Families at the Border of Child Protection: Integrated and Disintegrating Interventions in Social Institutions), “Kapocs”, vol. 4, no. 2, retrieved from: http://epa.oszk.hu/02900/02943/00017/pdf/EPA02943_kapocs_2005_2_03.pdf (accessed 27.06.2019).
  • Szombathelyi Sz. (2013), Kompetencia-fogalom használata és az interkulturális párbeszéd gyakorlata a szociális területen, (Use of the Concept of Competence and Practice of Intercultural Dialogue in the Social Field), Rubeus Egyesület, Budapest, retrieved from: http://rubeus.hu/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/24313_kompetencia_szsz_rubeus.pdf (accessed 27.06.2019).
  • Templeton L., Zohhadi S., Galvani S., Velleman R. (2006), “Looking Beyond Risk” Parental Substance Misuse: Scoping Study, Scottish Executive St Andrew’s House, Edinburgh, retrieved from: http://www.dldocs.stir.ac.uk/documents/beyondrisk.pdf (accessed 27.06.2019).
  • Webb M.A., Bunting L., Shannon R., Kernaghan D., Cunningham C., Geraghty T. (2014), Living with Adversity: A Qualitative Study of Families with Multiple and Complex Needs, Barnardo’s Northern Ireland, Belfast, retrieved from: https://pure.qub.ac.uk/portal/files/13205535/Living_with_Adversity_Full_Report_282_29.pdf (accessed 9.02.2019).
  • White A. (2005), Assessment of Parenting Capacity. Literature Review, Centre for Parenting & Research, Ashfield.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_18778_0208-600X_71_02
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.