A New Popular Front, or, on the Role of Critical Jurisprudence under Neo-Authoritarianism in Central-Eastern Europe

• Authors: Przemysław Tacik
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The current decade brought a neo-authoritarian wave to the countries in CEE. This process, which in certain respects runs parallel to the populist upsurge in Western countries, has its own specificity. Firstly, by focusing on the clash between “elites” and “the people”, it rekindles – in a displaced, right-wing form – the class conflict which before 1989 was an ideological staple in CEE countries. Secondly, insofar as neo-authoritarianism in CEE has often a distinctly neo-liberal agenda shadowed by declarative anti-globalism and national chauvinism, it warps the field of political struggle. Thirdly, in the neo-authoritarian turn law becomes the crucial field of ideological fight, principally in those countries where populists came to power. In this respect, new governments in CEE resort to a blend of old Fascist tools (such as dismantling of constitutional control and denying the primacy of international law) and new inventions (such as the effective state of exception in some areas of law in Poland introduced in 2015–18). The role of critical jurisprudence in CEE is therefore particularly significant and difficult. The paper argues that liberal jurisprudence, although actively engaged in analysing neo-authoritarianism, does not possess adequate conceptual tools for full success. Therefore critical jurisprudence should urgently take part in explaining neoauthoritarianism in the legal field.

Keywords

EN

neo-authoritarianism; constitutional crisis; rule of law; critical jurisprudence; populism

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
• Journal: Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Iuridica
• Year: 2019
• Volume: 89
• Pages: 31-44

Dates

published

2019-12-29

Contributors

author

Przemysław Tacik

• Jagiellonian University

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7174-1752

References

• Ágh, Attila. 2017. “The EU Polycrisis and Hard Populism in East-Central Europe: From the Copenhagen Dilemma to the Juncker Paradox”. Politics in Central Europe 13(2/3): 7–32.
• Azmanova, Albena. 2013. “The Crisis of Europe: Democratic Deficit and Eroding Sovereignty – Not Guilty”. Law and Critique 24: 23–38.
• Bonelli, Matteo. 2018. “A Federal Turn? The European Union’s Response to Constitutional Crises in the Member States”. Perspectives on Liberalism 10(1): 41–70.
• Broszat, Martin. 1969. Der Staat Hitlers: Grundlegung und Entwicklung seiner inneren Verfassung. München: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag.
• Bugaric, Bojan. Alenka Kuhelj. 2018. “Varieties of Populism in Europe: Is the Rule of Law in Danger?” Hague Journal of the Rule of Law 10: 21–33.
• The Economist Intelligence Unit’s. 2018. “Democracy Index”. https://infographics.economist.com/2018/DemocracyIndex/ [Accessed: 11 August 2018].
• Gdula, Maciej. 2018. Nowy autorytaryzm. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Krytyki Politycznej.
• Halmai, Gábor. 2014. “An Illiberal Constitutional System in the Middle of Europe”. European Yearbook on Human Rights 14: 497–514.
• Joerges, Christian. Christian Kreuder‐Sonnen. 2017. “European Studies and the European Crisis: Legal and Political Science between Critique and Complacency”. European Law Journal 23(1–2): 118–139.
• Kelemen, R. Daniel. 2017. “Europe’s Other Democratic Deficit: National Authoritarianism in Europe’s Democratic Union”. Government and Opposition 52(2): 211–238.
• Levi, Niel. Michael Rothberg, 2018. “Memory Studies in a Moment of Danger: Fascism, Postfascism, and the Contemporary Political Imaginary”. Memory Studies 11(3): 355–367.
• Mańko, Rafał. Cosmin Cercel. Adam Sulikowski. 2016. “Introduction. Law and Critique in Central Europe: Laying the Cornerstone”. In Law and Critique in Central Europe. Questioning the Past, Resisting the Present. 1–15. Edited by Rafał Mańko, Cosmin Cercel, Adam Sulikowski. Oxford: Counterpress.
• Müller, Jan-Werner. 2016. What Is Populism? Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• Oliver, Peter. Justine Stefanelli. 2016. “Strengthening the Rule of Law in the EU: The Council’s Inaction”. Journal of Common Market Studies 54(5): 1075–1084.
• Palombella, Gianluigi. 2018. “Illiberal, Democratic and Non-Arbitrary? Epicentre and Circumstances of a Rule of Law Crisis”. Hague Journal of the Rule of Law 10: 5–19.
• Pech, Laurent. Kim Lane Scheppele. 2017. “Illiberalism Within: Rule of Law Backsliding in the EU”. Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 19: 3–47.
• Pinelli, Cesare. 2011. “The Populist Challenge to Constitutional Democracy”. European Constitutional Law Review 7: 5–16.
• Poulantzas, Nicos. 1979. Fascism and Dictatorship. The Third International and the Problem of Fascism. London: Verso.
• Saward, Michael. 2010. The Representative Claim. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Scharpf, Fritz. 2015. “After the Crash: A perspective on Multilevel European Democracy”. European Law Journal 21(3): 384–403.
• Scheppele, Kim Lane. 2015. “Understanding Hungary’s Constitutional Revolution”. In Constitutional Crisis in the European Constitutional Area. Theory, Law and Politics in Hungary and Romania. 111–124. Edited by Armin von Bogdandy, Pal Sonervend. München: Beck, Hart & Nomos.
• Sólyom, László. 2015. “The Rise and Decline of Constitutional Culture in Hungary”. In Constitutional Crisis in the European Constitutional Area. Theory, Law and Politics in Hungary and Romania. 5–31. Edited by Armin von Bogdandy, Pal Sonerven. München: Beck, Hart & Nomos.
• Sulikowski, Adam. 2012. Konstytucjonalizm a nowoczesność. Dyskurs konstytucyjny wobec tryumfu i kryzysu moderny. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego.

Identifiers

DOI

10.18778/0208-6069.89.03