Identities and Everyday Interethnic Relationships

• Authors: Yolanda Zografova
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

This article examines the nature of group identity in order to gain insight into the character and quality of intergroup contacts, particularly the conditions for positive contacts between members of different ethnic groups. An important conception underlying the discussion is that identity is not a stable construct or fixed essence, but rather is discursive in nature and turns upon how individuals and collectivities distinguish themselves in their relations with other individuals and collectivities. Both resemblance and difference are thus essential principles of social identity, while ethnic identity is distinct from culture and may be analyzed as a form of social organization. This heightens the importance of the degree of permeability of group boundaries, and of one’s relation with their own ethnic group, in minimizing prejudice and fostering interethnic relations. Analysis of field interviews with members of Bulgarian and Bulgarian Turkish ethnic groups provided the basis for the theoretical discussion concerning intergroup contacts. The interviews also serve to illustrate the inverse relationship between intergroup contacts and prejudices, as well as the fact that insofar as intergroup ethnic conflicts and perceived differences occur between narrative constructs, they can be transformed and resolved through openness towards differences and dialogue.

Keywords

EN

Group Identity; Intergroup Contacts; Ethnic Groups; Interethnic Relations; Group Boundaries; Bulgarian and Bulgarian Turkish Ethnic Groups

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
• Journal: Qualitative Sociology Review
• Year: 2019
• Volume: 15
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 26-43

Dates

published

2019-05-23

Contributors

author

Yolanda Zografova

• Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Bulgaria

References

• Allport, Gordon W. 1954. The Nature of Prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
• Bakalova, Diana and Yolanda Zografova. 2014. “Intergroup Attitudes, Acculturation Expectations and Orientations in Ethnically Diverse Regions in Bulgaria.” Pp. 749-765 in Collected Papers from the VIIth National Congress of Psychology, Sofia, 31 October-2 November 2014, edited by S. Dzhonev, P. Dimitrov, and N. Mateeveva. Retrieved April 16, 2019 (https://ncp2014.files.wordpress.com/2014/10/sbornik_nauchni_dokladi-isbn-978-954-91472-9-2.pdf) (in Bulgarian).
• Barth, Fredrik. 1969. “Introduction.” Pp. 9-38 in Ethnic Groups and Boundaries. The Social Organization of Culture Difference, edited by F. Barth. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
• Berry, John. 2013. “Research on Multiculturalism in Canada.” International Journal of Intercultural Relations 37:663-675.
• Brubaker, Rogers. 2004. Ethnicity without Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Dovidio, John F., Samuel L. Gaertner, and Tamar Saguy. 2007. “Another View of ‘We’: Majority and Minority Group Perspectives on a Common Ingroup Identity.” European Review of Social Psychology 18(1):296-330.
• Dovidio, John F. et al. 2010. “Recategorization and Prosocial Behavior Common In-Group Identity and a Dual Identity.” Pp. 191-207 in The Psychology of Prosocial Behavior: Group Processes, Intergroup Relations, and Helping, edited by S. Stumer and M. Snyder. Oxford: Blackwell.
• Ehala, Martin, Howard Giles, and Jake Harwood. 2016. “Conceptualizing the Diversity of Intergroup Settings: The Web Model.” Pp. 301-316 in Advances in Intergroup Communication, edited by H. Giles and A. Maass. New York: Peter Lang.
• Gaertner, Samuel L. et al. 1993. “The Common Ingroup Identity Model: Recategorization and the Reduction of Intergroup Bias.” European Revue of Social Psychology 4(1):1-26.Gergen, Kenneth. 2009. Relational Being. Beyond Self and Community. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Gillespie, Alex. 2006. Becoming Other: From Social Interaction to Self-Reflection. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
• Hewitt, John P. 1976. Self and Society: A Symbolic Interactionist Social Psychology. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
• Insko, Chester A. et al. 2001. “Interindividual-Intergroup Discontinuity Reduction through the Anticipation of Future Interaction.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 80(1):95-111.
• Jenkins, Richard. 2008. Social Identity. London, New York: Routledge.
• Markova, Ivana. 2007. “Social Identities and Social Representations.” Pp. 215-236 in Social Representations and Identity: Content, Process, and Power, edited by G. Moloney and I. Walker. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Mead, George Herbert. 1934. Mind, Self, and Society. From The Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Pettigrew, Thomas. 1997. “Generalized Intergroup Contact Effects on Prejudice.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 23(2):173-185.
• Pettigrew, Thomas. 1998. “Intergroup Contact Theory.” Annual Review of Psychology 49(1):65-85.Pettigrew, Thomas. 2008. “Future Directions for Intergroup Contact Theory and Research.” International Journal of Intercultural Relations 32(3):187-199.
• Pettigrew, Thomas. 2012 “Deprovincialization.” Pp. 325-328 in The Encyclopedia of Peace Psychology, vol. 1, edited by D. Christie. Chichester: Willey-Blackwell.
• Pettigrew, Thomas and Linda Tropp. 2006. “A Meta-Analytic Test of Intergroup Contact Theory.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 90(5):751-783.
• Putnam, Robert D. 2007. “E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and Community in the Twenty-First Century.” The 2006 Johan Skytte Prize Lecture, Scandinavian Political Studies 30(2): 137-174.
• Redmond, Mark V. 2015. “Symbolic Interactionism.” English Technical Reports and White Papers 4. Retrieved April 16, 2019 (http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/engl_reports/4).
• Tajfel, Henri. 1981. Human Groups and Social Categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Tajfel, Henri and Jonathan C. Turner. 1986. “The Social Identity Theory of Inter-Group Behavior. Pp. 7-24 in Psychology of Intergroup Relations, edited by S. Worchel and W. G. Austin. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
• Verkuyten, Maykel. 2010. “Multiculturalism and Tolerance: An Intergroup Perspective.” Pp. 147-170 in Social Issues and Interventions. The Psychology of Social and Cultural Diversity, edited by R. J. Crisp. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
• Verkuyten, Maykel, Jochem Thijs, and Hidde Bekhuis. 2010. “Intergroup Contact and Ingroup Reappraisal: Examining the Deprovincialization Thesis.” Social Psychology Quarterly 73(4):398-416.
• Vermeulen, Hans and Cora Govers. 2000. “Introduction.” Pp. 1-9 in The Anthropology of Ethnicity: “Beyond Ethnic Groups and Boundaries,” edited by H. Vermeulen and C. Govers. Amsterdam: Het Spinhuis.
• Visintin, Emilio et al. 2016. “Identification and Ethnic Diversity Underlie Support for Multicultural Rights: A Multilevel Analysis in Bulgaria.” International Journal of Intercultural Relations 51:1-13.
• Zografova, Yolanda. 2016. Diversity from a Social Psychological Perspective. Sofia: MIV Consult (in Bulgarian).

Identifiers

DOI

10.18778/1733-8077.15.2.03