Polska adaptacja narzędzia do badania subiektywnej witalności w ujęciu Ryana i Frederick

• Authors: Karolina Mudło-Głagolska

Title variants

EN

Polish adaptation of the subjective vitality scale by Ryan and Frederick

Abstracts

EN

In recent years, attention has been paid to the phenomenological quality of vitality. The construct of subjective vitality as a marker of psychological well-being has the advantage over it that it is more accessible in phenomenological experience, is independent of external well-being criteria, such as objective success, health, support or achievements, and goes beyond the semantically known constructs known in Poland, such as affect positive, commitment to work, flow or life satisfaction. Until now, the possibility of assessing subjective vitality was limited, so to fill this gap, the validity and reliability of the Polish version of the Subjective Vitality Scale was tested, which allows the assessment of subjective vitality at the trait level. In a sample of 709 respondents, the factor accuracy of three versions: 7-, 6- and 5-position in Polish was assessed. The 5-position version had the best fit of the model to the data. Analysis of the value of Cronbach,s α coefficient and the discriminatory power of the position showed that the scale can be considered reliable. The validity in the convergent and divergent aspect was tested on the basis of the relationship between subjective vitality and the dimensions of chronic fatigue, negative and positive affect, somatic symptoms, anxiety, functional disorders, symptoms of depression, life satisfaction and vitality in a different conceptualization and the number of hours devoted to recreational activities. The predictive value of satisfaction with meeting psychological needs in general and with regard to work was partially confirmed. The analysis of intergroup differences carried out in a sample of 40 people suffering from discopathy and a selected control group showed that the sick and somatically healthy people differed significantly in the result of subjective vitality. The Subjective Vitality Scale can be regarded as an accurate and reliable tool. The 5-item version of the Subjective Vitality Scale is recommended.

PL

W ostatnich latach zwraca się uwagę na fenomenologiczną jakość witalności. Konstrukt subiektywnej witalności jako marker dobrostanu psychicznego ma tę nad nim przewagę, że jest bardziej dostępny w doświadczeniu fenomenologicznym, jest niezależny od zewnętrznych kryteriów dobrostanu i różni się od innych konstruktów z tego obszaru (takich jak np. afekt pozytywny, zaangażowanie w pracę, flow czy satysfakcja z życia). Dotąd możliwość oceny subiektywnej witalności była w Polsce ograniczona, zatem przetestowano trafność i rzetelność polskiej wersji Skali subiektywnej witalności. W próbie 709 osób oceniono trafność czynnikową trzech wersji skali w języku polskim. Na podstawie α Cronbacha i mocy dyskryminacyjnej narzędzie można uznać za rzetelne. Przetestowano trafność skali w aspekcie zbieżnym i różnicowym na podstawie zależności subiektywnej witalności od innych konstruktów psychologicznych. Częściowo potwierdzono wartość predykcyjną satysfakcji z zaspokojenia potrzeb psychologicznych w ogóle i w odniesieniu do pracy. Analiza różnic międzygrupowych wykazała, że wynik subiektywnej witalności u osób chorych i zdrowych somatycznie był istotnie różny. Skalę subiektywnej witalności można uznać za narzędzie trafne i rzetelne. Zalecane jest stosowanie jej wersji 5-pozycyjnej.

Keywords

PL

adaptacja skali; dobrostan; energia; subiektywna witalność; żywotność

EN

energy; subjective vitality; scale adaptation; vitality; well-being

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie
• Journal: Studia Psychologica
• Year: 2020
• Volume: 20
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 21-40

Dates

published

2020

Contributors

author

Karolina Mudło-Głagolska

• Uniwersytet Kazimierza Wielkiego w Bydgoszczy

• https://orcid.org/0000000180793781

References

• Adie, J. W., Duda, J. L., Ntoumanis, N. (2012). Perceived coach-autonomy support, basic need satisfaction and the well-and ill-being of elite youth soccer players: A longitudinal investigation. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 13(1), 51–59. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2011.07.008
• Akaike, H. (1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52, 317–332. DOI: 10.1007/BF02294359
• Arkes, H. R., Herren, L. T., Isen, A. M. (1988). The role of potential loss in the influence of affect on risk-taking behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 42(2), 181–193. DOI: 10.1016/0749-5978(88)90011-8
• Benyamini, Y., Idler, E. L., Leventhal, H., Leventhal, E. A. (2000). Positive affect and function as influences on self-assessments of health: expanding our view beyond illness and disability. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 55, 107–116. DOI: 10.1093/geronb/55.2.P107
• Bertrams, A., Dyllick, T. H., Englert, C., Krispenz, A. (2020). German adaptation of the Subjective Vitality Scales (SVS-G). Open Psychology, 2, 57–75. DOI: 10.1515/psych-2020-0005
• Bostic, T. J., Rubio, D. M., Hood, M. (2000). A validation of the subjective vitality scale using structural equation modeling. Social Indicators Research, 52, 313–324. DOI: 10.1023/A:1007136110218
• Brzozowski, P., Watson, D. B., Clark, L. A. (2010). Skala uczuć pozytywnych i negatywnych SUPIN. Polska adaptacja skali PANAS Davida Watsona i Lee Ann Clark. Podręcznik. Warszawa: Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych Polskiego Towarzystwa Psychologicznego.
• Cohen, S., Alper, C. M., Doyle, W. J., Treanor, J. J., Turner, R. B. (2006). Positive emotional style predicts resistance to illness after experimental exposure to rhinovirus or influenza a virus. Psychosomatic Medicine, 68, 809–815. DOI: 10.1097/01.psy.0000245867.92364.3c
• Chen, F., Curran, P. J., Bollen, K. A., Kirby, J., Paxton, P. (2008). An empirical evaluation of the use of fixed cutoff points in RMSEA test statistic in structural equation models. Sociological Methods & Research, 36, 462–494. DOI: 10.1177/0049124108314720
• Dawes, H., Collett, J., Meaney, A., Duda, J., Sackley, C., Wade, D., … Izadi, H. (2014). Delayed recovery of leg fatigue symptoms following a maximal exercise session in people with multiple sclerosis. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 28, 139–148. DOI: 10.1177/1545968313503218
• Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19, 109–134. DOI:10.1016/0092-6566(85)90023-6
• Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M. (2000). The „What” and „Why” of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268. DOI:10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
• Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: a macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology, 49, 182–185. DOI:10.1037/a0012801
• Gagné, M. (2003). The role of autonomy support and autonomy orientation in prosocial behavior engagement. Motivation and Emotion, 27, 199–223. DOI:10.1023/A:1025007614869
• Goldbeck, F., Hautzinger, M., Wolkenstein, L. (2019). Validation of the german version of the Subjective Vitality Scale – a cross-sectional study and a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Well-Being Assessment, 3, 17–37. DOI: 10.1007/s41543-019-00019-8
• Gumz, A., Kästner, D., Raczka, K. A., Weigel, A., Osen, B., Rose, M., … Karacic, M. (2015). Aggregating factors of the change process in the treatment of anorexia nervosa. Eating Behaviors, 19, 81–85. DOI: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.002
• Gunnell, K. E., Crocker, P. R., Mack, D. E., Wilson, P. M., Zumbo, B. D. (2014). Goal contents, motivation, psychological need satisfaction, well-being and physical activity: A test of self-determination theory over 6 months. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 15, 19–29. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2013.08.005
• Huta, V. (2015). The complementary roles of eudaimonia and hedonia and how they can be pursued in practice. W: S. Joseph (red.), Positive psychology in practice: Promoting human flourishing in work, health, education, and everyday life (s. 159–182). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons. DOI: 10.1002/9781118996874.ch10
• Huta, V., Waterman, A. S. (2014). Eudaimonia and its distinction from hedonia: developing a classification and terminology for understanding conceptual and operational definitions. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15, 1425–1456. DOI: 10.1007/s10902-013-9485-0
• Iso-Ahola, S. E. (1980). The social psychology of leisure and recreation. Dubuque, Iowa: William C Brown.
• Juczyński, Z. (2001). Narzędzia pomiaru w promocji i psychologii zdrowia. Warszawa: Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych Polskiego Towarzystwa Psychologicznego.
• Kasser, T., Cohn, S., Kanner, A. D., Ryan, R. M. (2007). Some costs of American corporate capitalism: a psychological exploration of value and goal conflicts. Psychological Inquiry, 18, 1–22. DOI: 10.1080/10478400701386579
• Kawabata, M., Yamazaki, F., Guo, D. W., Chatzisarantis, N. L. D. (2017). Advancement of the Subjective Vitality Scale: examination of alternative measurement models for Japanese and Singaporeans. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 27, 1793–1800. DOI: 10.1111/sms.12760
• Kenyon, M., Young, F., Mufti, G. J., Pagliuca, A., Lim, Z., Ream, E. (2015). Life coaching following haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a mixed‐method investigation of feasibility and acceptability. European Journal of Cancer Care, 24, 531–541. DOI: 10.1111/ecc.12297
• Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (Methodology in the social sciences, wyd. 2). NY: Guilford Press.
• Makowiec-Dąbrowska, T., Koszada-Włodarczyk, W. (2006). Przydatność kwestionariusza CIS20R do badania zmęczenia przewlekłego. Medycyna Pracy, 57, 335–345.
• Makowska, Z., Merecz, D. (2001). Polska adaptacja kwestionariuszy ogólnego stanu zdrowia Davida Goldberga: GHQ-12 i GHQ-28. W: B. Dudek (red.), Ocena zdrowia psychicznego na podstawie badań kwestionariuszami Davida Goldberga. Podręcznik dla użytkowników kwestionariuszy GHQ-12 i GHQ-28 (s. 191–264). Łódź: IMP.
• Martela, F., DeHaan, C. R., Ryan, R. M. (2016). On enhancing and diminishing energy through psychological means: Research on vitality and depletion from self-determination theory. W: E. R. Hirt, J. Clarkson, L. Jia (red.), Self-regulation and ego control (s. 67–85). Saint Louis: Academic Press.
• Martela, F., Ryan, R. M. (2016). Prosocial behavior increases well-being and vitality even without contact with the beneficiary: Causal and behavioral evidence. Motivation and Emotion, 40, 351–357. DOI: 10.1007/s11031-016-9552-z
• Maydeu-Olivares, A. (2017). Assessing the size of model misfit in structural equation models. Psychometrika, 82, 533–558. DOI: 10.1007/s11336-016-9552-7
• Nix, G. A., Ryan, R. M., Manly, J. B., Deci, E. L. (1999). Revitalization through self-regulation: the effects of autonomous and controlled motivation on happiness and vitality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35(3), 266–284. DOI: 10.1006/jesp.1999.1382
• Polk, D. E., Cohen, S., Doyle, W. J., Skoner, D. P., Kirschbaum, C. (2005). State and trait affect as predictors of salivary cortisol in healthy adults. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 30(3), 261–272. DOI: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2004.08.004
• Reis, H. T., Sheldon, K. M., Gable, S. L., Roscoe, J., Ryan, R. M. (2000). Daily well-being: the role of autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 419–435. DOI: 10.1177/0146167200266002
• Rizzolatti, G., Sinigaglia, C. (2016). The mirror mechanism: a basic principle of brain function. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 17, 757–765. DOI: 10.1038/nrn.2016.135
• Rouse, P. C., Veldhuijzen van Zanten, J. J. C. S., Ntoumanis, N., Metsios, G. S., Yu, C., Kitas, G. D., Duda, J. L. (2015). Measuring the positive psychological well-being of people with rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-sectional validation of the subjective vitality scale. Arthritis Research & Therapy, 17(312), 1–7. DOI: 10.1186/s13075-015-0827-7
• Rozanski, A., Blumenthal, J. A., Davidson, K. W., Saab, P. G., Kubzansky, L. (2005). The epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management of psychosocial risk factors in cardiac practice: the emerging field of behavioral cardiology. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 45, 637–651. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.12.005
• Ryan, R. M. (1995). Psychological needs and the facilitation of integrative processes. Journal of Personality, 63, 397–427. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1995.tb00501.x
• Ryan, R. M., Bernstein, J. H., Brown, K. W. (2010). Weekends, work, and well-being: psychological need satisfactions and day of the week effects on mood, vitality, and physical symptoms. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 29, 95–122. DOI: 10.1521/jscp.2010.29.1.95
• Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: a review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 141–166. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141
• Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L. (2006). Self‐regulation and the problem of human autonomy: does psychology need choice, self‐determination, and will? Journal of Personality, 74, 1557–1586. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00420.x
• Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L. (2008). From ego depletion to vitality: theory and findings concerning the facilitation of energy available to the self. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 702–717. DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00098.x
• Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. New York, NY: Guilford Press. DOI:10.7202/1041847ar
• Ryan, R. M., Frederick, C. (1997). On energy, personality, and health: subjective vitality as a dynamic reflection of well‐being. Journal of Personality, 65, 529–565. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1997.tb00326.x
• Salama-Younes, M. (2011). Positive mental health, subjective vitality and satisfaction with life for French physical education students. World Journal of Sport Sciences, 4, 90–97.
• Savalei, V. (2012). The relationship between root mean square error of approximation and model misspecification in confirmatory factor analysis models. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72, 910–932. DOI: 10.1177/0013164412452564
• Selye, H. (1956). The stress of life. NY: McGraw-Hill.
• Sheldon, K. M., Kasser, T. (1995). Coherence and congruence: two aspects of personality integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 531–543. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.68.3.531
• Sheldon, K. M., Ryan, R., Reis, H. T. (1996). What makes for a good day? Competence and autonomy in the day and in the person. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1270–1279. DOI: 10.1177/01461672962212007
• Shi, D., Lee, T., Maydeu-Olivares, A. (2019). Understanding the model size effect on SEM fit indices. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 79, 310–334. DOI: 10.1177/0013164418783530
• Souza, L. A. S. de, Torres, A. R. R., Barbosa,G. A., Lima, T. J. S. de, Souza, L. E. C. de. (2015). Bem-estar subjetivo e burnout em cadetes militares: o papel mediador da autoeficácia. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 28, 744–752. DOI: 10.1590/1678-7153.201528412
• Tylka, J., Piotrowicz, R. (2009). Kwestionariusz oceny jakości życia SF-36 – wersja polska (Quality of life SF-36 questionnaire – the Polish version). Kardiologia Polska (Polish Heart Journal), 67, 1166–1169.
• Uchnast, Z. (2007). Skala Podstawowych Potrzeb Psychologicznych, E. L. Deci, R. M. Ryan. Tekst niepublikowany. Lublin: KUL.
• Uysal, R., Satici, S. A., Satici, B., Akin, A. (2014). Subjective vitality as mediator and moderator of the relationship between life satisfaction and subjective happiness. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 14(2), 489–497. DOI: 10.12738/estp.2014.2.1828
• Wang, W. C., Chen, H. F., Jin, K. Y. (2015). Item response theory models for wording effects in mixed-format scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 75,157–178. DOI: 10.1177/0013164414528209

Identifiers

DOI

10.21697/sp.2020.20.1.02

Biblioteka Nauki

1878760