Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2016 | 3 | 4(12) | 227-243

Article title

The U. S. – Taiwan and the U. S. – Poland Non-Confrontational Asymmetry: A Comparative Analysis

Content

Title variants

PL
Stany Zjednoczone - Tajwan i USA - Polska, niespójna asymetria: analiza porównawcza

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

EN
The article concerns the comparison of two cases of non-confrontational asymmetry in international relations: between Taiwan and the United States and between Poland and the United States. The author explores the differences and the common elements of both situations. The outcome provides a background for comparative studies concerning not only the international situation of Taipei and Warsaw, but also an introduction to comparative approaches concerning political developments in Eastern Europe and East Asia.
PL
Artykuł dotyczy porównania dwóch przypadków niekonfrontacyjnej asymetrii w stosunkach międzynarodowych: między Tajwanem a Stanami Zjednoczonymi oraz między Polską a Stanami Zjednoczonymi. Autor bada różnice i elementy wspólne obu sytuacji. Wynik stanowi podstawę do badań porównawczych dotyczących nie tylko międzynarodowej sytuacji Tajpej i Warszawy, ale także wprowadzenie do porównawczych podejść dotyczących wydarzeń politycznych w Europie Wschodniej i Azji Wschodniej.

Year

Volume

3

Issue

Pages

227-243

Physical description

Dates

published
2016-10-24

Contributors

  • Kolegium Ekonomiczno-Społeczne, Szkoła Główna Handlowa w Warszawie

References

  • AIT [1982], Joint Communiqué of the United States of America and the People’s Republic of China 1982, American Institute in Taiwan, August 17, http://www.ait.org.tw/en/us-jointcommunique-1982.html (16.01.2015).
  • Antonowicz L. [1997], Status prawnomiędzynarodowy Republiki Chińskiej na Tajwanie, in: Tajwan w stosunkach międzynarodowych, E. Haliżak (ed.), Scholar, Warsaw.
  • Bergstern C.F. [2008], A Partnership of Equals, “Foreign Affairs”, vol. 87, no. 4.
  • Brzeziński Z. [2010], From Hope to Audacity, Appraising Obama’s Foreign Policy, “Foreign Affairs”, vol. 89, no. 1.
  • Bullard M.E. [2007], Strait Talk: Avoiding a Nuclear War Between the US and China Over Taiwan, Monterey Institute of International Studies, Monterey.
  • Cameron D. [2015], U.S. Clears Weapons Sale to Taiwan, “The Wall Street Journal”, December 16,
  • http://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-clears-weapons-sale-to-taiwan-1450291541 (16.01.2015).
  • CFA [2000], If Taiwan Declares Independence and China Reacts with Force, On Whom Should the US Lean Harder?, Council of Foreign Affairs, April 19, http://www.cfr.org/asia-andpacific/if-taiwan-declares-independence-china-reacts-force-whom-should-us-lean-harderchina-taiwan/p3628 (16.01.2015).
  • Cheng Lo C. [2010], Deconstructing ECFA, Challenges and Opportunities for Taiwan, Taiwan Brain Trust, Taipei.
  • Chien-chao H. [2011], A New History of Taiwan, Taipei.
  • Cline R.S. [1980], World Power Trends and U.S. Foreign Policy for the 1980’s, Westview Press, Boulder.
  • Cohen Z. [2015], U.S. Sells $ 1.83 Billion of Weapons to Taiwan Despite Chinese Objections,
  • CNN Politics, December 17, http://edition.cnn.com/2015/12/16/politics/u-s-taiwan-armssales/ (16.01.2015).
  • CRS [2012], Pivot to the Pacific? The Obama Administration’s Rebalancing Toward Asia, Congressional Research Service, March 28.
  • Dionne Jr.E.J. [2009], The Obama Doctrine in Action, “The Washington Post”, April 16,
  • http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/04/15/AR2009041502902.html (16.01.2015).
  • Dobrzycki W. [1996], Historia stosunków międzynarodowych w czasach nowożytnych, 1815–1945, Scholar, Warsaw.
  • FAC [2013], Taiwan Policy Act, Foreign Affairs Committee, http://foreignaffairs.house.gov/bill/hr419-taiwan-policy-act-2013 (16.01.2015).
  • Finnmore M. [2003], The Purpose of Intervention, Changing Believes about the Use of Force, Cornell University Press, New York.
  • Gaddis J.L. [2007], Strategie powstrzymywania, Książka i Wiedza, Warsaw.
  • Gardner L.C. [1999], Strefy wpływów, wielkie mocarstwa i podział Europy, Książka i Wiedza, Warsaw.
  • Heath T.R. [2014], China and the US Alliance System, ”The Diplomat”, June 11, http://thediplomat.com/2014/06/china-and-the-u-s-alliance-system/ (16.01.2015).
  • Hongang W. [2014], With Great Power Comes Great Responsibility, Konrad Adenauer Stifftung Dicussion Paper, June.
  • Hu Z., Kuo D. [2010], U.S. Arms Sales to Return to Normal Track: Taiwan Official, TheGlobalSecurity.org, August 26, http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/news/taiwan/2010/taiwan100826-cna01.htm (16.01.2015).
  • Inboden W. [2009], What Is Power? A Bold New Design for a Master Metric of National Power, “The American Interest”, vol. V, no. 2.
  • Kaplan R. [2010], The Geography of Chinese Power, How Far Can Beijing Reach on Land and at Sea, “Foreign Affairs”, vol. 89, no. 3.
  • Kowalczyk A. [2015], Polityka Polski wobec Ukrainy w 2014r. – próba bilansu, “Biuletyn OPINIE FAE”, no. 3, http://fae.pl/biuletynopiniefaerpukraina2014.pdf (16.01.2015).
  • Kowanda C. [2014], CBOS: 35 proc. młodych Polaków rozważa emigrację, “Polityka”, December 5, http://www.polityka.pl/tygodnikpolityka/rynek/1601651,1, cbos-35-proc-mlodychpolakow-rozwaza-emigracje.read (16.01.2015).
  • MFARP [1979], Taiwan Relations Act, January 1, http://www.ait.org.tw/en/taiwan-relationsact.html (16.01.2015).
  • MFARP [2016], Polsko-amerykańskie stosunki dwustronne, Ministry of Foreign Affairs Republic of Poland, https://www.msz.gov.pl/pl/polityka_zagraniczna/inne_kontynenty/ameryka_polnocna/stosunki_dwustronne_ameryka_pln/polsko_amerykanskie_stosunki_dwustronne;jsessionid=30615330C53F1FB4EC7DC9A007915DDF.cmsap1p (16.01.2015).
  • NATO [1997], The Founding Act on Mutual Relations, Cooperation and Security between NATO and the Russian Federation, http://web.archive.org/web/19980130072914/http://www.nato.int/docu/basictxt/fndact-b.htm (16.01.2015).
  • NATO [1999], The Washington Declaration, April 23, http://www.nato.int/docu/pr/1999/p99-063e.htm (16.01.2015).
  • NPC [2005], The Anti-Secession Law, Adopted at the Third Session of the Tenth National People’s Congress on March 14, http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/ce/cebe/eng/zt/gs/t187130.htm (16.01.2015).
  • Nye J.S., Jr. [2012], Przyszłość siły, PWN, Warsaw.
  • NYT [2007], Democratic Presidential Debate on NPR, “The New York Times”, December 4, http://
  • www.nytimes.com/2007/12/04/us/politics/04transcript-debate.html?pagewanted=7&_r=0 (16.01.2015).
  • Polak A., Joniak J. [2013], Sztuka wojenna, Akademia Obrony Narodowej, Warsaw.
  • QS [2015], QS World University Rankings 2015/16, http://www.topuniversities.com/universityrankings/world-university-rankings/2015#sorting=rank+region=+country=+faculty=+stars=false+search= (16.01.2015).
  • Schlapak D., Orletsky D.T., Reid T.I. [2009], A Question of Balance, Political Context and Military Aspects of a China-Taiwan Dispute, RAND Corporation, National Security Research Division, http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monographs/2009/RAND_MG888.pdf (16.01.2015).
  • TG [2015], US and Poland in Talks Over Weapons Deployment in Eastern Europe, “The Guardian”, June 14, http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jun/14/us-poland-weapons-deploymenteastern-europe-russia (18.02.2016).
  • The text and comment concerning the Shanghai Communiqué [n.d.], http://www.stosunkimiedzynarodowe.info/haslo,komunikat_szanghajski (16.01.2015).
  • Toft I.A. [2001], How the Weak Win Wars, a Theory of Asymmetric Conflict, “International Security”, vol. 26, no. 1.
  • Tong-chen M. [2010], China’s Strategy Toward Taiwan, in: Deconstructing ECFA, Challenges and Opportunities for Taiwan, C. Cheng Lo (ed.), Taiwan Brain Trust, Taipei.
  • TT [2013], US Passes Law Supporting Taiwan ICAO Bid, “Taipei Times”, Jul 14, http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2013/07/14/2003567056 (16.01.2015).
  • TT [2016], Russia condemns ‘aggressive’ US plan for tanks in Eastern Europe, “The Telegraph”, February 17, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/poland/11675648/Russiacondemns-aggressive-US-plan-for-tanks-in-Eastern-Europe.html (18.02.2016).
  • U.S. [1957], American Foreign Policy. 1950–1955 Basic Documents, Historical Office. Congress. Senate. Committee on Foreign Relations, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington.
  • U.S. TaiwanConnect [2015], The Information Gateway to the U.S.-Taiwan Partnership, http://www.ustaiwanconnect.org/US-Taiwan-Relations/Trade
  • Wei C.N. [2010], China’s Anti-Secession Law and Hu Jintao’s Policy, “Yale Journal of International Affairs”, no. 4, pp. 112–127, http://yalejournal.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/105112wei.pdf (16.01.2015).
  • Wojtas M. [2013], Innowacyjność polskiej gospodarki na tle krajów Unii Europejskiej, “Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego”, no. 57.
  • Wu J.J. [2014], The Future of U.S.-Taiwan Relations, “The Diplomat”, May 14, http://thediplomat.com/2014/05/the-future-of-u-s-taiwan-relations/ (16.01.2015).
  • Zybertowicz A. [2014], Pułapka średniego rozwoju, “W sieci”, no. 9, http://wpolityce.pl/polityka/186963-pulapka-sredniego-rozwoju-pulapka-polega-na-zadowoleniu-sie-widzialnympostepem-i-niedostrzezeniu-braku-trwalych-podstaw-samodzielnego-rozwoju (16.01.2015)

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_33119_KSzPP_2016_4_10
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.