Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2024 | XXIV | 2 | 9-21

Article title

Profesjonalny rozwój zawodowy – atrybut wydajności pracy zespołów pielęgniarskich

Content

Title variants

EN
Professional development: an attribute of the performance of nursing teams'

Languages of publication

Abstracts

EN
Introduction: Professional development is recognized as a means of updating knowledge and skills, affects the quality of care and patient safety and leads to increased productivity for nurses. Material and methods: The study included 508 nurses employed by hospitals. A diagnostic survey method and the Six Dimension Scale of Nursing Performance (SDNS) were used. The material was analyzed statistically. Results: The nurses’ work performance index was 3.38, and their professional development index was 3.49. The responsibility criterion was rated at 3.84. The lowest scores occurred in the case of knowledge of nursing regulations (3.19) and professional autonomy (3.21). A high score of 3.71 was recorded in the area of taking on new responsibilities. Conclusions: The professional development of nurses is satisfactory. Nurses demonstrate a strong awareness of responsibility and a high level of work performance in taking on new responsibilities. In the areas of autonomy and knowledge of nursing regulations they perform at a low level.
PL
Wprowadzenie: Profesjonalny rozwój zawodowy jest uznawany za środek do zdobywania aktualnej wiedzy i umiejętności, który wpływa na jakość opieki, bezpieczeństwo pacjentów i prowadzi do zwiększenia wydajności pracy pielęgniarek. Materiał i metody: Badaniem objęto 508 pielęgniarek zatrudnionych w szpitalach. Zastosowano metodę sondażu diagnostycznego oraz narzędzie badawcze Six Dimension Scale of Nursing Performance (SDNS). Materiał poddano analizie statystycznej. Wyniki: Wskaźnik wydajności pracy pielęgniarek wyniósł 3,38, a profesjonalnego rozwoju zawodowego – 3,49. Kryterium odpowiedzialność oceniono na poziomie 3,84. Najniżej oceniono wiedzę na temat uregulowań prawnych pielęgniarstwa (3,19) oraz autonomii zawodowej (3,21). Wysoki wynik odnotowano w aspekcie podejmowania nowych obowiązków – 3,71. Wnioski: Profesjonalny rozwój zawodowy pielęgniarek jest zadowalający. Pielęgniarki są świadome odpowiedzialności oraz podejmują nowe obowiązki na wysokim poziomie wydajności pracy. Z kolei niski poziom wydajności pracy dotyczy demonstrowania autonomii oraz znajomości uregulowań prawnych pielęgniarstwa.

Year

Volume

Issue

2

Pages

9-21

Physical description

Dates

published
2024

Contributors

author
  • Uniwersytet Medyczny w Lublinie
  • Akademia Zamojska

References

  • Boniol M, Kunjumen T, Nair TS, Siyam A, Campbell J, Diallo K. The global health workforce stock and distribution in 2020 and 2030: a threat to equity and ‘universal’ health coverage?. BMJ Glob Health. 2022; 7(6): e009316, https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009316.
  • State of the world’s nursing 2020. Investing in education, jobs and leadership.World Health Organization, Geneva 2020; https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/331677/9789240003279-eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y [dostęp:4.10.2024].
  • Yu X, Huang Y, Liu Y. Nurses’ perceptions of continuing professional development:a qualitative study. BMC Nurs. 2022; 21: 162, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-00940-z.
  • Competencies for nurses working in primary health care. World Health Organization, Copenhagen 2020; https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/365607/WHOEURO-2020-6958-46724-68019-eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y [dostęp:4.10.2024].
  • Steward D, Schober M, Nissen L, Ladd E, Lamarche K, Bournival M-L, Gray D, Secilla S, Kroezen M, Wong F. Guidelines on prescriptive authority for nurses – 2021. International Council of Nurses, Geneva 2021; https://www.icn.ch/sites/default/files/2023-04/ICN_Nurse_prescribing_guidelines_EN.pdf [dostęp: 4.10.2024].
  • Mlambo M, Silén C, McGrath C. Lifelong learning and nurses’ continuing professional development, a metasynthesis of the literature. BMC Nurs. 2021; 20: 62, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-021-00579-2.
  • Ustawa z dnia 15 lipca 2011 r. o zawodzie pielęgniarki i położnej (Dz.U. 2011, nr 174, poz. 1039 ze zm.).
  • Ustawa z dnia 6 listopada 2008 r. o prawach pacjenta i Rzeczniku Praw Pacjenta (Dz.U. 2009, nr 52, poz. 417 ze zm.).
  • Brunt BA, Russell J. Nursing Professional Development Standards. National Library of Medicine, StatPearls Publishing; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK534784 [dostęp: 29.11.2022].
  • Samuel A, Cervero RM, Durning SJ, Maggio LA. Effect of Continuing Professional Development on Health Professionals’ Performance and Patient Outcomes: A Scoping Review of Knowledge Syntheses. Acad Med. 2021; 96(6): 913–923, https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000003899.
  • King R, Taylor B, Talpur A, Jackson C, Manley K, Ashby N, Tod A, Ryan T, Wood E, Senek M, Robertson S. Factors that optimise the impact of continuing professional development in nursing: A rapid evidence review. Nurse Educ Today. 2021; 98:104652, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104652.
  • Vázquez-Calatayud M, Errasti-Ibarrondo B, Choperena A. Nurses’ continuing professional development: A systematic literature review. Nurse Educ Pract. 2021; 50:102963, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102963.
  • Motowidlo SJ, Borman WC, Schmidt MJ. A theory of individual differences in task and contextual performance. Human Performance. 1997; 10(2): 71–83, https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1002_1.
  • Burton WN, Pransky G, Conti DJ, Chen C-Y, Edington DW. The association of medical conditions and presenteeism. J Occup Environ Med. 2004; 46(6 Suppl): 38–45, https://doi.org/10.1097/01.jom.0000126687.49652.44.
  • Munir F. The Work Limitation Questionnaire. Occup Med. 2008; 58(4): 310–311, https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqn039.
  • Schwirian PM. Evaluating the performance of nurses: a multidimensional approach. Nurs Res. 1978; 27(6): 347–351.
  • Al-Makhaita HM, Sabra AA, Hafez AS. Job performance among nurses working in two different health care levels, Eastern Saudi Arabia: A comparative study. Int J Med Sci Public Health. 2014; 3(7): 832–837, https://doi.org/10.5455/ijmsph.2014.240420142.
  • The World Health Report 2000. Health Systems: Improving Performance. World Health Organization, Geneva 2000; https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/42281/WHR_2000-eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y [dostęp: 4.10.2024].
  • Fujino Y, Tanaka M, Yonemitsu Y, Kawamoto R. The relationship between characteristics of nursing performance and years of experience in nurses with high emotional intelligence. Int J Nurs Pract. 2015; 21(6): 876–881, https://doi.org/10.1111/ijn.12311.
  • Badiyepeymaie Jahromi Z, Kargar M, Ramezanli S. Study of the Relationship Between Nurse Self-Concept and Clinical Performance Among Nursing Students. Jentashapir J Health Res. 2015; 6(5): e28108: 54–58, https://doi.org/10.17795/jjhr-28108.
  • Geyer N-M, Coetzee SK, Ellis SM, Uys LR. Relationship of nurses’ intrapersonal characteristics with work performance and caring behaviors: A cross-sectional study.Nurs Health Sci. 2018; 20(3): 370–379, https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12416.
  • Christensen SS. Escape from the diffusion of responsibility: A review and guide for nurses. J Nurs Manag. 2019; 27(2): 264–270, https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12677.
  • Younas A. Self-awareness: A tool for providing culturally competent care. Nursing. 2020; 50(2): 61–63, https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NURSE.0000651628.71776.b3.
  • Rasheed SP, Younas A, Sundus A. Self-awareness in nursing: A scoping review. J Clin Nurs. 2019; 28(5–6): 762–774, https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14708.
  • Pursio K, Kankkunen P, Sanner-Stiehr E, Kvist T. Professional autonomy in nursing: An integrative review. J Nurs Manag. 2021; 29(6): 1565–1577, https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.13282.
  • Panczyk M, Cholewa SD, Żero R, Szydlarska D, Machaj M, Gotlib J. Ocena możliwości rozwoju zawodowego pielęgniarek z wybranych szpitali specjalistycznych. Medical Problems. 2015; 51(3): 6–15.
  • Osei SA, Boahemaa AF, Peprah WK, Marfo-Kusi AA, Pinamang BN. Continuous Professional Development on Job Performance of Registered Nurses in Ghana. Abstract Proceedings International Scholars Conference. 2019; 7(1): 116–128, https://doi.org/10.35974/isc.v7i1.920.
  • Mokhtar KM, Mohamed M. Job Performance among nurses in Pediatric Department (Khartoum State 2015). Nurs Health Care Int J. 2017; 1(4): 000119.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

Biblioteka Nauki
59582564

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_48269_2451-0858-pis-2024-2-001
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.