Proces wyłonienia się kanonu biblijnego w świetle rękopisów z Qumran

• Authors: Michał Klukowski

Title variants

EN

The process of the emergence of the biblical canon in the light of the Qumran manuscripts

Abstracts

EN

The article deals with the emergence of the biblical canon in the light of the Qumran manuscripts. In the first part of the article, the author explains the terminology of the literature on the subject. In the second part, it presents the criteria on the basis of which a given book is considered authoritative. In the third part, it presents the issues of data interpretation based on these criteria.

Keywords

EN

canon; Qumran; Dead Sea Scrolls; authoritative books

PL

kanon; Qumran; zwoje znad Morza Martwego; księgi autorytatywne

• Publisher: Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Łodzi
• Journal: Łódzkie Studia Teologiczne
• Year: 2022
• Volume: 31
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 23-31

Dates

published

2022

Contributors

author

Michał Klukowski

• Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II w Lublinie

• https://orcid.org/0000000311307406

References

• Beckwith R.T., “The Significance of the 364-Day Calendar for the Old Testament Canon”, Calendar, Chronology and Worship, red. R.T. Beckwith; Leiden: Brill 2005, 54–66.
• Berthelot K., “4QMMT et la question du canon de la Bible hébraïque”, From 4QMMT to Resurrection. Mélanges qumrâniens en hommage à Émile Puech, red. F. García Martínez, A. Steudel, E.J.C. Tigchelaar; STDJ 61, Leiden: Brill 2006, 1–14.
• Berthelot K., “Authoritative Scriptures: Torah and Related Texts”, T&T Clark Companion to the Dead Sea Scrolls, red. G.J. Brooke, C. Hempel, London: T&T Clark 2019, 264‒268.
• Brooke G.J., “The Explicit Presentation of Scripture in 4QMMT”, Legal Texts and Legal Issues; Proceedings of the Second Meeting of the International Organization for Qumran Studies, Cambridge 1995. Published in Honour of Joseph M. Baumgarten, red. J. Kampen, M.J. Bernstein, F. García Martínez, STDJ 23, Leiden: Brill 1997, 67‒88.
• Brooke G.J.,“Between Authority and Canon: The Significance of Reworking the Bible for Understanding the Canonical Process”, Reworking the Bible. Apocryphal and Related Texts at Qumran. Proceedings of a Joint Symposium by the Orion Center for the Study of the Dead Sea Scrolls and Associated Literature and the Hebrew University Institute for Advanced Studies Research Group on Qumran, 15–17 January, 2002, red. E.G. Chazon, D. Dimant, R. Clements; STDJ 58, Leiden: Brill 2005, 85‒104.
• Campbell J.G., “4QMMTd and the Tripartite Canon”, Journal of Jewish Studies 51 (2000) 181–190.
• Coblentz Bautch K., Weinbender J., “Authoritative Scriptures: Other Texts”, T&T Clark Companion to the Dead Sea Scrolls, red. G.J. Brooke, C. Hempel, London: T&T Clark 2019, 280‒285.
• Dahmen U., “Authoritative Scriptures: Writings and Related Texts”, T&T Clark Companion to the Dead Sea Scrolls, red. G.J. Brooke, C. Hempel, London: T&T Clark 2019, 273‒279.
• Dempster S.G., “Torah, Torah, Torah. The Emergence of the Tripartite Canon”, Exploring the Origins of the Bible: Canon Formation in Historical, Literary, and Theological Perspective, red. C.A. Evans, E. Tov, Acadia Studies in Bible and Theology; Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic 2008, 87‒127.
• Evans C.A., “The Dead Sea Scrolls and the Canon of Scripture in the Time of Jesus”, The Bible at Qumran: Text, Shape and Interpretation, red. P.W. Flint, SDSSRL, Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans 2001, 67–79.
• Lim T.H., “The Alleged Reference to the Tripartite Division of the Hebrew Bible”, Revue de Qumrân 20/1 (2001) 23–37.
• Lim T.H., “Authoritative Scriptures and The Dead Sea Scrolls”, The Oxford Handbook of the Dead Sea Scrolls, red. J.J. Collins, T.H. Lim, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010, 303‒322.
• McDonald M.L, Kanon Biblii. Źródła, przekaz, znaczenie, Prymasowska Seria Biblijna; Warszawa: Vocatio 2021.
• Najman H., Seconding Sinai: The Development of Mosaic Discourses in Second Temple Judaism, SJSJ 77; Leiden: Brill 2003).
• Pajunen M., “Bible,” T&T Clark Companion to the Dead Sea Scrolls, red. G.J. Brooke, C. Hempel, London: T&T Clark, 2019, 369‒377.
• Puech É., “Quelques observations sur le ‛canon’ des ‛Écrits’,” Authoritative Scriptures in Ancient Judaism, red. M. Popović; JSJSup 141, Leiden: Brill 2010, 227‒251.
• Qimron E., Strugnell J., Qumran Cave 4.V: Miqsat Maʿaśe ha-Torah, DJD X; Oxford: Clarendon 1994.
• Sanecki A., Kanon biblijny w perspektywie historycznej, teologicznej i egzegetycznej, Kraków: Dehon, 2008.
• Szymik S., “Qumran a Kanon Biblii Hebrajskiej,” Qumran. Pomiędzy Starym a Nowym Testamentem, red. H. Drawnel, A. Piwowar, ABL 2, Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL 2009, 77‒91.
• Tronina A., Biblia w Qumran. Wprowadzenie w lekturę rękopisów znad Morza Martwego, Biblioteka Zwojów. Tło Nowego Testamentu 8, Kraków: The Enigma Press 2001.
• Tronina A., Komentarze Biblijne z Qumran. Od midraszu do peszeru, Teksty z Pustyni Judzkiej 6, Kraków‒Mogilany: The Enigma Press, 2020.
• Ulrich E., “The Non-attestation of a Tripartite Canon in 4QMMT,” Catholic Biblical Quarterly 65 (2003) 202–214.
• Ulrich E., “The Jewish Scriptures: Texts, Versions, Canons,” The Eerdmans Dictionary of Early Judaism, red. J.J. Collins, D.C. Harlow, Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans 2010, 97‒119.
• Ulrich E., “Scriptures at Qumran and the Road Toward Canon,” The Dead Sea Scrolls and the Developmental Composition of the Bible, VTSup 169, Leiden: Brill 2015) 299‒308.
• VanderKam J.C., “Revealed Literature in the Second Temple Period”, From Revelation to Canon: Studies in Hebrew Bible and Second Temple Literature, red. J.C. VanderKam, JSJSup 62, Leiden: Brill 2000, 1‒30.
• VanderKam J.C., “Questions of Canon Viewed through the Dead Sea Scrolls”, The Canon Debate, red. L.M. McDonald, J.A. Sanders, Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 2002, 91‒109.
• Vielhauer R., “Authoritative Scriptures: Prophets and Related Texts”, T&T Clark Companion to the Dead Sea Scrolls, red. G.J. Brooke, C. Hempel, London: T&T Clark, 2019, 269‒272.

Identifiers

DOI

10.52097/lst.2022.1.23-31

Biblioteka Nauki

22676685