Reforma wymiaru sprawiedliwości w państwach postsowieckich - perspektywa porównawcza

• Authors: Louise I. Shelley

Title variants

EN

Justice Reform in Post-Soviet Successor States: A Comparative Perspective

• Languages of publication: PL

Abstracts

EN

The patterns of justice existing in the former Soviet Union have endured in most Soviet successor states despite the collapse of the USSR. Rather, the Soviet legacy in the criminal justice arena has been much more enduring than many observers had suggested. Although the last year and a half has seen the Rose, Orange and Kyrgyz revolutions, major change in the legal system has been less profound than in many former socialist countries of Eastern Europe. These revolutions represented popular revolts against the corruption of the ruling elite but they have not brought systemic justice reforms. Georgia may have experienced the most profound effort to promote justice reform, but the reform is not in all sectors of the legal system. Ukraine, despite the change in the national leadership, has yet to make major reforms in its legal system. Russia, in many ways returning to its Soviet patterns of behaviour, has a justice system subject to the political desires of the national leadership. Unlike in many countries, in Eastern Europe where there has been a motivation to join the European Union and to leave behind the Soviet legacy, the successor states to the USSR still face legal systems as corrupted, inefficient and authoritarian as those tied to the Marxist-Leninist system. The problems of the justice system remain even without a Communist ideology. Without a political will to change these systems, a new legal consciousness among the citizenry or a strong incentive for change, the situation in the Slavic states of the former USSR resembles in profound ways the system that was supposedly left behind. The last year and a half has seen three "so-called" revolutions in Soviet successor states – Georgia, Ukraine and Kyrgyzstan. But in only one of these has there been an effort to introduce profound change into the legal system and to right the wrongs committed during the previous government. Even though there have been many lessons learned from this experience, a government that is well-intentioned but not wise in govemance cannot resolve the serious challenges to order in a highly criminalised and corrupt society. The Soviet legacy combined with the pre-revolutionary authoritarian traditions are proving more intractable to reform than many anticipated.

Keywords

PL

wymiar sprawiedliwości; reforma; państwa postsowieckie; justice reform; post-soviet states; wymiar sprawiedliwości; reforma; państwa postsowieckie; justice reform; post-soviet states

EN

justice reform; post-soviet states

• Publisher: Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN / Institute of Legal Studies PAN
• Journal: Archiwum Kryminologii
• Year: 2006
• Issue: XXVIII
• Pages: 57-66

Dates

published

2006-01-29

Contributors

author

Louise I. Shelley

References

• Beck A., Robertson A., Policing in Post Soviet Russia [w:] W.A. Pridemore (red.), Ruling Russia Law, Crime and Justice in a Changing Society, Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham 2005.
• Carothers Th., Promoting the Rule of Law Abroad: In Search of Knowledge, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Washington D.C. 2006.
• Coppieters B., Legvold R. (red.), Statehood and Security Georgia After the Rose Revolution, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. 2005.
• Crime, Violence and Political Conflict in Russia [w:] P. Collier, N. Sambanis (red.), Understanding Civil War, t. II, Europe, Central Asia, and other Regions, World Bank, Washington D.C. 2005.
• Gavrilova N.S. i in., Patterns of violent crime in Russia [w:] W.A. Pridemore (red.), Ruling Russia Law, Crime and Justice in a Changing Society, Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham 2005.
• Gould J.A., Where have all the illiberal democracies gone? Privatization as a catalyst to regime change in Postcommunist Europe, ,,EES News” 2005, listopad-grudzień.
• Karklins R., The System Made Me Do It Corruption in Post-Communist Societies, M.E. Sharpe, Armonk 2005.
• Kupatadze A., Siradze G., Mitagvaria G., Structural Reorganization and Staff Optimization in The Ministry of Internal Affairs [w:] L. Shelley i in. (red.), Organised Crime and Corruption in Georgia, Routledge London 2005.
• Los M., Zybertowtcz A., Privatizing the Police State. The Case of Poland, Macmillan, Houndmills 2000.
• Łuniejew W.W., Prestupnost w XX wieka, Norma, Moskwa 1997.
• McAdams A.J., Transitional Justice and the Rule of Law in New Democracies, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame 1997.
• Piacenti L., Surviving Russian Prisons. Punishment, Economy und Politics in Transition, Willan Publishing, Devon 2004.
• Solomon Jr. P.H., The criminal procedure code of 2001, will it make Russian justice more fair? [w:] W.A. Pridemore (red.), Ruling Russia Law, Crime und Justice in a Changing Society, Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham 2005.
• Varese F., The Russian Mafia. Private Protection in a New Market Economy, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2001.
• Volkov V., Violent Entrepreneurs. The Use of Force in the Making of Russian Capitalism, Cornell University Press, Ithaca 2002.

Identifiers

DOI

10.7420/AK2005-2006C